Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 752–756 | Cite as

Proximally Based Anterolateral-Thigh (ALT) Flap for Knee Reconstruction: An Advancement Propeller Perforator Flap

  • Pierfrancesco Cadenelli
  • Daniele Bordoni
  • Stefano Radaelli
  • Andrea Marchesi
Case Report General Reconstruction
  • 645 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Adequate coverage of the knee region is often challenging for plastic and orthopedic surgeons. In the last decade, among several reconstructive techniques, local perforator flaps have become useful reconstructive units. After a wide resection for soft-tissue sarcoma, the knee vascular web may be reasonably damaged and, consequently, perforator flaps based on a local pedicle [such as the distally based anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap] are not reliable. Thus, we harvested a proximally based ALT for knee coverage.

Methods

A 52-year-old man underwent local radiation therapy and a wide resection of a soft-tissue sarcoma on the anterior-lateral aspect of the left knee, which resulted in a 15 × 10 cm defect. The defect was covered with a proximally based ALT, through an advancement and propeller relocation of its skin paddle.

Results

All margins were tumor free. After 5 days, the donor site was closed primarily because of edema. Neither necrosis of the flap nor dehiscence of the wound was detected. No local relapses were detected at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

In case of soft-tissue defects of the knee region, with likely involvement of the local vascular web, a local perforator solution is the advancement and propeller proximally based ALT flap.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Sarcoma Knee Soft tissue Reconstruction ALT Perforator flap 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Singer S, Demetri GD, Baldini EH, Fletcher CD (2000) Management of soft-tissue sarcomas: an overview and update. Lancet Oncol 1:75–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    My Nahabedian, Mont MA, Orlando JC, Delanois RE, Hungerford DS (1999) Operative management and outcome of complex wounds following total knee artroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1688–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaienti L, Marchesi A, Palitta G, Gazzola R, Parodi PC, Leone F (2013) Limb trauma: the use of an advanced wound care device in the treatment of full-thickness wounds. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 8(2):111–115PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang T, Zhang EW, Lineaweaver WC, Zhang F (2013) Recipient vessels in the free flap reconstruction around the knee. Ann Plast Surg 71(4):429–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Louer CR, Garcia RM, Earle SA, Hollenbeck ST, Erdmann D, Levin LS (2015) Free flap reconstruction of the knee: an outcome study of 34 cases. Ann Plast Surg 74(1):57–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yildirim S, Avci G, Akan M, Misirlioğlu A, Aköz T (2003) Anterolateral thigh flap in the treatment of postburn flexion contractures of the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1630–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen CY, Chen CYHsieh CH, Kuo YR, Jeng SF (2007) An anterolateral thigh perforator flap from the ipsilateral thigh for soft-tissue reconstruction around the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(2):470–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siebert C, Höfler HR, Bruns J, Hansis M (1996) Reversed musculus biceps femoris flap for covering a defect of the distal thigh. Chirurg 67(11):1188–1192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pozzobon LR, Helito CP, Guimarães TM, Gobbi RG, Pécora JR, Camanho GL (2013) Rotation flaps for coverage after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras 21(4):219–222PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaienti L, Menozzi A, Lonigro J, Soresina M, Ravasio G (2010) The salvage of knee-exposed prosthesis using neurofasciocutaneous sural flap. Musculoskelet Surg 94(1):33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suri MP, Friji MT, Ahmad QG et al (2010) Utility of proximally based sural artery flap for lower thigh and knee defects. Ann Plast Surg 64:462–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tos P, Innocenti M, Artiaco S, Antonini A, Delcroix L, Geuna S, Battiston B (2011) Perforator-based propeller flaps treating loss of substance in the lower limb. J Orthopaed Traumatol 12:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaienti L, Calori GM, Leone F, Brioschi M, Parodi PC, Marchesi A (2014) Posterior tibial artery perforator flaps for coverage of Achilles region defects. Injury 45(Suppl 6):S133–S137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y, Itoh S (2002) Perforator flaps in lower extremity reconstruction. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 34:251–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fujiwara T, Chen CC, Ghetu N, Jeng SF, Kuo YR (2010) Antegrade anterolateral thigh perforator flap advancement for soft-tissue reconstruction of the knee: case report. Microsurgery 30(7):549–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang G (1990) Reversed anterolateral thigh island flap and myocutaneous flap transplantation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 70(676–8):46Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pan SC, Yu JC, Shieh SJ, Lee JW, Huang BM, Chiu HY (2004) Distally based anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1768–1775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cotrufo S, Hart A (2010) A note of caution on the use of the distally based anterolateral thigh flap: anatomical evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:30e–31eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giunta RE, Geisweid A, Feller A (2000) The value of preoperative doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2381–2386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erba P, Raffoul W, Bauquis O (2012) Safe dissection of the distally based anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 28:405–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gravvanis AI, Iconomou TG, Panayotou PN, Tsoutsos DA (2005) Medial gastrocnemius muscle flap versus distally based anterolateral thigh flap: conservative or modern approach to the exposed knee joint? Plast Reconstr Surg 116:932–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu TY, Jeng SF, Yang JC, Shih HS, Chen CC, Hsieh CH (2010) Reconstruction of the skin defect of the knee using a reverse anterolateral thigh island flap: cases report. Ann Plast Surg 64(2):198–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong CH, Goh T, Tan BK, Ong YS (2013) The anterolateral thigh perforator flap for reconstruction of knee defects. Ann Plast Surg 70(3):337–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin SJ, Rabie A, Yu P (2010) Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative Doppler or imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 26(1):67–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierfrancesco Cadenelli
    • 1
  • Daniele Bordoni
    • 1
  • Stefano Radaelli
    • 2
  • Andrea Marchesi
    • 3
  1. 1.Plastic Surgery UnitFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
  2. 2.Sarcoma Service, Department of SurgeryFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. IRCCS Policlinico San DonatoUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations