Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 602–607 | Cite as

An Experimental Study of Auricular Reconstruction Using a Thin Porous Silastic Frame Assisted by Tissue Expansion: An Animal Study

Original Article Experimental/Special Topics
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

Background

In the 1960s, the silastic ear frame was used for auricular reconstruction. Most surgeons abandoned the use of the silastic ear frame in the 1980s because of the high incidence of exposure. In this study, we introduce the computer-aided design and manufacture of a thin, porous silastic auricle frame and investigate the possibility of auricular reconstruction using this frame assisted by tissue expansion.

Methods

An adult male with average sized, normal ears was selected. A spiral CT scan was performed to obtain primitive data on his external ear. Mimics-8.1 and Geomagic studio-12 were used for 3D reconstruction and image processing. A thin, porous silastic auricle frame 1.4 mm in thickness was manufactured. A 50 ml kidney-shaped tissue expander was implanted between the panniculus carnosus and the deep fascia through an incision on the back of each of 10 New Zealand white rabbits. Each week the expander was inflated with 10 ml saline to a total of 160 m1. Maintenance of the expansion lasted for a month. The expander was then removed, and the silastic auricle frame was inserted into the pocket. The reconstructed ears were observed for 6 months postoperatively.

Results

The reconstructed ears remained soft and flexible, with no deformation, contracture, or extrusion observed 6 months postoperatively. The scaphoid fossa, triangular fossa, cavum, helix, and antihelix remained defined.

Conclusions

The silastic frame, 1.4 mm in thickness manufactured by computer-aided design, stood up to the contraction of the overlying expanded flap. It is possible to be used for auricular reconstruction assisted by tissue expansion.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Porous silastic auricular frame Auricular reconstruction Tissue expansion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Cronin TD (1966) Use of a silastic frame for total and subtotal reconstruction of the external ear: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 37(5):399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cronin TD (1968) Follow-up study of silastic frame for reconstruction of external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 42(6):522–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Monrne CW (1972) Our experience with the silicone ear flamework: a report of 17 ears and 15 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 49(4):428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohmori S (1974) Follow up study on reconstruction of microtia with silicone framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 53(5):555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohmori S (1979) A refined approach to ear reconstruction with silastic frames in major degrees of microtia. Br J Plast Surg 32(4):267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohmori S, Sekiguchi H (1984) Follow-up study of the reconstruction of microtia using silastic frame. Aesthet Plast Surg 8(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanzer RC (1967) Total reconstruction of the auricle: a 10-year report. Plast Reconstr Surg 40(6):547–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanzer RC (1978) Microtia. Clin Plast Surg 5(3):317–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brent B (1980) The correction of microtia with autogenous cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(1):1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oneal RM, Rohrich RJ (1984) Skin expansion as an adjunct to reconstruction of the extend ear. Br J Plast Surg 37(4):517–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hata Y, Hosokawa K, Yano K et al (1989) Correction of microtia using the tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(5):741–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sasaki GI (1990) Tissue-expansion in reconstruction of acquired auricle. Chin Plast Surg 17(2):327–338Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chana JS, Grobbelaar AO (1997) Tissue expansion as an adjunct to construction of congenital and acquired auricular deformities. Br J Plast Surg 50(6):456–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu J, Sun J, Li X (2011) Total auricular reconstruction without skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(10):1312–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryShen Zhen People’s HospitalShen ZhenChina
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Cosmetic SurgeryChina Mei Tan General HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations