Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 491–494 | Cite as

Vaginal Rejuvenation with Gore-Mycromesh

  • Tae Hwan ParkEmail author
  • Kwi Whan Whang
Multimedia Manuscript Aesthetic


Recently, we introduced functional vaginal rejuvenation with elastic silicone threads. However, some patients with specific indications need other biocompatible materials for rejuvenation of the vagina. Gore-Mycromesh is one of the most commonly used materials in plastic and reconstructive surgical fields and it is composed of expanded poly-tetrafluroethylene. In this study, we introduced our clinical experience with static vaginal rejuvenation using Gore-Mycromesh to specifically assess the overall patient satisfaction (Female Sexual Function Index, FSFI). This study included 50 patients who underwent vaginal rejuvenation with a Gore-Mycromesh between 2010 and 2012. After marking two incisions at the inner side of the vaginal inlet and posterior wall, respectively, we performed submucosal dissection at the posterior vaginal wall and then grafted and secured a Gore-Mycromesh to the dissected area (muscle/fascia). Overall the FSFI improved as time progressed up to a year postoperatively. This is especially prominent in the FSFI satisfaction subscore. All but eight patients (42/50, 84 %) were “very satisfied (5)” or “satisfied (4)” with the outcomes after the vaginal rejuvenation. The overall complication rate was 8 %. Based on our clinical experience with the 50 cases, we think that vaginal rejuvenation with Gore-Mycromesh significantly improved postoperative outcomes, resulting in improved sexual function with a focus on improving the FSFI satisfaction subscore in mid-term follow-up. Elderly patients experience better outcomes using gore mycromesh rather than silicone thread because we can plicate the vaginal posterior wall with senile changes simultaneously using an open technique. However, further studies would be warranted for better positioning and adherence of grafted implants to surrounding tissue and for increasing the tightening effect of the implant and its sufficient longevity.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors


Genitalia Vagina Rejuvenation Gore-tex, mesh 



None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 38443 kb). Video1: Appearance of Gore-Mycromesh and the surgical technique


  1. 1.
    Adamo C, Corvi M (2009) Cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening (lateral colporrhaphy): improving sexual sensitivity in women with a sensation of wide vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:212e–213ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodman MP (2011) Female genital cosmetic and plastic surgery: a review. J Sex Med 8:1813–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostrzenski A (2012) Vaginal rugation rejuvenation (restoration): a new surgical technique for an acquired sensation of wide/smooth vagina. Gynecol Obstet Invest 73:48–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park TH, Park HJ, Whang KW (2015) Functional vaginal rejuvenation with elastic silicone threads: a 4-year experience with 180 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 49:36–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31:1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ostrzenski A (2011) An acquired sensation of wide/smooth vagina: a new classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158:97–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang D, Zhang J, Wang H et al (2014) Comparative study on laparoscopic vaginoplasty using pedicled ileal and sigmoid colon segment transfer. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi 49:172–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright C, Hanna MK (2014) Thirty-six vaginal constructions: lessons learned. J Pediatr Urol 10(4):667–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wierckx K, Elaut E, Van Hoorde B et al (2014) Sexual desire in trans persons: associations with sex reassignment treatment. J Sex Med 11:107–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piaggio LA (2014) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: review from a surgeon’s perspective in the beginning of the twenty-first century. Front Pediatr 1:50PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nemoto T, Bodeker B, Iwamoto M et al (2014) Practices of receptive and insertive anal sex among transgender women in relation to partner types, sociocultural factors, and background variables. AIDS Care 26:434–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moriya K, Morita K, Mitsui T et al (2014) Impact of laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment in patients with disorders of sex development. J Pediatr Urol 10(5):955–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michala L, Liao LM, Wood D et al (2014) Practice changes in childhood surgery for ambiguous genitalia? J Pediatr Urol 10(5): 934–939Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scheim AI, Bauer GR (2014) Sex and gender diversity among transgender persons in Ontario, Canada: results from a respondent-driven sampling survey. J Sex Res 52(1):1–14PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McQuillan SK, Grover SR (2014) Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 25:299–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li S, Sun C, Shi B et al (2014) Laparoscopic vaginoplasty using a sigmoid graft through the umbilical single-incision hybrid transperineal approach: our initial experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 24:354–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li FY, Xu YS, Zhou CD et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of vaginoplasty with autologous buccal micromucosa. Obstet Gynecol 123:951–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lanza H, Balestrelli J, Pastoni D et al (2014) Vaginoplasty technique using vulvoperineal flaps. Aesthet Plast Surg 38:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang Z, Liu P, Luo G (2014) Comparison of improved laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty and gasless laparoscopic ileal vaginoplasty in treatment of androgen insensitivity syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290(4):691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Buleun Health Care CenterIncheonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Miz Aesthetic Surgery ClinicSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations