Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 718–726 | Cite as

The Free-Nipple Breast-Reduction Technique Performed with Transfer of the Nipple–Areola Complex Over the Superior or Superomedial Pedicles

  • Karaca BasaranEmail author
  • Funda Akoz Saydam
  • Idris Ersin
  • Memet Yazar
  • Ahmet Cemal Aygit
Multimedia Manuscript Breast

Abstract

Background

Although the free-nipple breast-reduction technique is essentially an amputation, achieving aesthetic results still is important. The authors present their technique for free nipple–areola complex (NAC) transfer over the superomedial or superior pedicle full-thickness flaps in patients for whom a free-nipple technique is inevitable due to certain risk factors.

Methods

The study included 25 patients who underwent surgery with the aforementioned method for addressing severe gigantomastia. The patients had a mean age of 43 years (range 34–59 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 35.8 kg/m2 (range 28–42 kg/m2). During the operation, the NAC was elevated as a full-thickness skin graft, then transposed to the superior or superomedial pedicles, which had been planned previously. The subsequent stages of the operation thus became a Wise-pattern breast reduction.

Results

The mean resection per breast was 1,815 g (range 1,620–2,410 g). Breast projection, shape, and areolar pigmentation were assessed during the follow-up visit. One patient experienced a partial loss of the NAC graft, which healed secondarily, and three patients experienced a patchy hypopigmentation of the NAC. Breast projection and conical structure were observed to be preserved during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

The modified free-nipple technique aimed to convert the reduction procedure to a technique similar to pedicle methods, yielding successful results during the early phases. The full-thickness flap constructed in this way provides more fullness and a maximum contribution to projection in patients who will inevitably undergo breast reduction with the free-nipple method.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Free-nipple breast reduction Projection Superior pedicle Superomedial pedicle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

Video 1

Free-nipple breast-reduction technique performed with transfer of the nipple–areola complex over the superior pedicle. (MP4 12132 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:64–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Skoog T (1963) A technique of breast reduction; transposition of the nipple on a cutaneous vascular pedicle. Acta Chir Scand 126:453–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L (2009) Reduction mammoplasty with superolateral dermoglandular pedicle: details of 15 years of experience. Ann Plast Surg 63:255–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balch CR (1981) The central mound technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:305–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKissock PK (1976) Reduction mammaplasty by the vertical bipedicle flap technique. Rationale and results. Clin Plast Surg 3:309–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Güven E, Aydin H, Başaran K, Aydin U, Kuvat SV (2010) Reduction mammaplasty using bipedicled dermoglandular flaps and free-nipple transplantation. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:738–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lacerna M, Spears J, Mitra A, Medina C, McCampbell E, Kiran R, Mitra A (2005) Avoiding free nipple grafts during reduction mammaplasty in patients with gigantomastia. Ann Plast Surg 55:21–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Özerdem OR, Anlatici R, Maral T, Demiralay A (2002) Modified free-nipple graft reduction mammaplasty to increase breast projection with superior and inferior dermoglandular flaps. Ann Plast Surg 49:506–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nahabedian MY, McGibbon BM, Manson PN (2000) Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:896–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wettstein R, Christofides E, Pittet B, Psaras G, Harder Y (2011) Superior pedicle breast reduction for hypertrophy with massive ptosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerzenshtein J, Oswald T, McCluskey P, Caplan J, Angel MF (2005) Avoiding free-nipple grafting with the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg 55:245–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Başaran K, Ucar A, Guven E, Arinci A, Yazar M, Kuvat SV (2011) Ultrasonographically determined pedicled breast reduction in severe gigantomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:252e–259ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gorgu M, Ayhan M, Aytug Z, Aksungur E, Demirdover C (2007) Maximizing breast projection with combined free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty and back-folded dermoglandular inferior pedicle. Breast J 13:226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koger KE, Sunde D, Press BH, Hovey LM (1994) Reduction mammaplasty for gigantomastia using inferiorly based pedicle and free-nipple transplantation. Ann Plast Surg 33:561–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Misirlioglu A, Akoz T (2005) Familial severe gigantomastia and reduction with the free-nipple graft vertical mammoplasty technique: report of two cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karsidag S, Akcal A, Karsidag T, Yesiloglu N, Yesilada AK, Ugurlu K (2011) Reduction mammaplasty using the free-nipple-graft vertical technique for severe breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the superior dermoglandular flap. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas DA (1996) Reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients. Br J Plast Surg 49:442–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hawtof DB, Levine M, Kapetansky DI, Pieper D (1989) Complications of reduction mammaplasty: comparison of nipple-areolar graft and pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 23:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen CL, Shore AD, Johns R, Clark JM, Manahan M, Makary MA (2011) The impact of obesity on breast surgery complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:395e–402ePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aydin H, Bilgin-Karabulut A, Tümerdem B (2002) Free-nipple reduction mammaplasty with a horizontal scar in high-risk patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:457–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Casas LA, Byun MY, Depoli PA (2001) Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Romano JJ, Francel TJ, Hoopes JE (1992) Free-nipple graft reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 28:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abramson DL (1999) Increasing projection in patients undergoing free-nipple graft reduction mammoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 23:282–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Serra MP, Longhi P, Sinha M (2010) Breast reduction with a superomedial pedicle and a vertical scar (Hall-Findlay’s technique) experience with 210 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 64:275–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chestak KC (2013) Revision surgery following breast reduction and mastopexy. In: Neligan PC (ed) Plastic Surgery, vol 5 (Breast), 3rd edn. Elsevier, Saunders, Philadelphia, p. 247Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karaca Basaran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Funda Akoz Saydam
    • 1
  • Idris Ersin
    • 1
  • Memet Yazar
    • 2
  • Ahmet Cemal Aygit
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBagcilar Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgerySisli Etfal Hospital IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic SurgeryIstanbul Kemerburgaz UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations