Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 543–548 | Cite as

Prevention of Capsular Contracture with Guardix-SG® After Silicone Implant Insertion

  • Seong Oh Park
  • Jihyeon Han
  • Kyung Won Minn
  • Ung Sik JinEmail author
Original Article Breast



Capsular contracture is the most common side effect of breast implant insertion and the problem that breast surgeons seek to avoid the most. Previous animal studies have proved that an antiadhesive barrier solution (AABS) prevents peri-implant capsule formation. In this study, the authors sought to explore the effect that Guardix-SG®, an AABS that can encapsulate implants in the form of a gel, can have on capsular contracture.


This study used 12 female New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.5–3 kg. Implants were inserted into the subpanniculus carnosus plane through an incision in the bilateral midback area. Once the implant was inserted, 3 g of Guardix-SG® and normal saline were instilled into the left and right sides, respectively. The rabbits were killed 6 months after the procedure. The intracapsular pressure was measured using tonometry with a 38.2-g circular glass piece, and capsular thickness was measured by dyeing the biopsy specimen with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome stain. The myofibroblasts were quantitatively analyzed through monoclonal anti-alpha smooth muscle actin antibody immunohistochemistry staining.


The intracapsular pressure in the control group (4.51 ± 0.98 mmHg) was significantly higher (p = 0.002) than in the study group (3.51 ± 0.4 mmHg). The average capsular thickness was significantly greater in the control group (0.33 ± 0.15 mm; p = 0.015). In the analysis, the interrelation between capsular thickness and intracapsular pressure was insignificant in both groups, as was the number of myofibroblasts in both groups (p = 0.582).


Through this study, the authors were able to demonstrate that capsular contracture can be suppressed in the rabbit model by instilling Guardix-SG® after insertion of cohesive gel implants in the subpanniculus carnosus plane.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors


Capsular contracture Cohesive gel implants Guardix-SG Silicone implant insertion 



This study was supported by Genewel, a Dongsung Company, Seongnam City, Korea.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Lew DH, Yoon JH, Hong JW, Tark KC (2010) Efficacy of antiadhesion barrier solution on peri-implant capsule formation in a white rat model. Ann Plast Surg 65:254–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore JR (1979) Applanation tonometry of breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:9–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hakelius L, Ohlsén L (1997) Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a five-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1566–1569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhardt BR, Eades E (1995) The effect of Biocell texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline-inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1317–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smahel J (1977) Histology of the capsules causing constrictive fibrosis around breast implants. Br J Plast Surg 30:324–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah Z, Lehman JA Jr, Tan J (1981) Does infection play a role in breast capsular contracture? Plast Reconstr Surg 68:34–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Virden CP, Dobke MK, Stein P, Parsons CL, Frank DH (1992) Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:173–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker JL Jr, Chandler ML, LeVier RR (1981) Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:905–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman H, Stonerock C, Lefaivre J, Yost M (2004) The effect of seprafilm and interceed on capsule formation around silicone discs in a rat model. J Invest Surg 17:271–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagakura T, Hirata H, Tsujii M, Sugimoto T, Miyamoto K, Horiuchi T, Nagao M, Nakashima T, Uchida A (2005) Effect of viscous injectable pure alginate sol on cultured fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:831–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oh SH, Kim JK, Song KS, Noh SM, Ghil SH, Yuk SH, Lee JH (2005) Prevention of postsurgical tissue adhesion by antiinflammatory drug-loaded pluronic mixtures with sol–gel transition behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A 72:306–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reigel DH, Bazmi B, Shih SR, Marquardt MD (1993) A pilot investigation of poloxamer 407 for the prevention of leptomeningeal adhesions in the rabbit. Pediatr Neurosurg 19:250–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zimman OA (2007) A rabbit model for capsular contracture: development and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1955–1956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bucky LP, Ehrlich HP, Sohoni S, May JW Jr. (1994) The capsule quality of saline-filled smooth silicone, textured silicone, and polyurethane implants in rabbits: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1123–1131; (discussion 1132–1133)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ajmal N, Riordan CL, Cardwell N, Nanney LB, Shack RB (2003) The effectiveness of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna) in reducing capsular formation around implants in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1455–1461; (discussion 1462–1463)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uzunismail A, Perk C, Findik H, Beyhan G, Dincler M (2008) Effect of a fascial tissue interface on silicone implant capsule formation: a preliminary experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1199–1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moufarrege R, Beauregard G, Bosse JP, Papillon J, Perras C (1987) Outcome of mammary capsulotomies. Ann Plast Surg 19:62–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ersek RA (1991) Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: a comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:879–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT (2000) Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:786–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F, Kim DJ (2010) Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:716–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seong Oh Park
    • 1
  • Jihyeon Han
    • 1
  • Kyung Won Minn
    • 1
  • Ung Sik Jin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySeoul National University HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations