Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 504–512 | Cite as

Anatomic Study of the Retaining Ligaments of the Face and Applications for Facial Rejuvenation

Original Article Aesthetic

Abstract

Background

The retaining ligaments of the face support the facial soft tissue in a normal anatomic position, thereby resisting gravitational change. In this study, a technique utilizing surgical plication of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) to the retaining ligaments of the face and finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME) dissection of the midface is presented.

Methods

The anatomy of the facial retaining ligaments was studied in 20 half-faces of ten fresh cadavers, and the localization of the ligaments was examined macroscopically. Surgical correction of facial aging with plication of the SMAS to the retaining ligaments and FAME dissection of the midface has been performed in 74 face-lift patients since 2006. Outcomes were determined by case notes, clinical review, and a patient questionnaire.

Results

The studied ligaments (zygomatic and masseteric) were present in all cadaver dissections. The zygomatic ligament was located 4.3–5.5 cm from the tragus and originates near the inferior border of the anterior zygomatic arch. The masseteric ligament was located 3.7–5.2 cm from the tragus below the junction of the zygomatic arch and masseter muscle. All the patients answered a satisfaction questionnaire and reported high levels of satisfaction at least 1 year after treatment.

Conclusions

We have identified the facial retaining ligaments in all cadaver dissections and their relationship with other structures of the face are described here. This study demonstrates that our face-lift technique is safe and produces highly predictable and natural results.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Facial retaining ligaments FAME Surgical face-lift 

References

  1. 1.
    Furnas DW (1989) The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:11–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuzin J, Baker T, Gordon H (1992) The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:441–449; discussion 450–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGregor M (1959) Face lift techniques. Presented at the 1st Annual Meeting of the California Society of Plastic Surgeons, Yosemite, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitz V, Peyronie M (1976) The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:80–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skoog T (1974) Plastic surgery: new methods and refinements. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Owsley JQ Jr (1977) Platysma fascial rhytidectomy: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:843–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ (1996) Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and extended SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 98(7):1135–1143 discussion; 1144–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker T, Gordon H, Stuzin J (2008) Surgical rejuvenation of the face, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stuzin J (2008) MOC-PSSM CME article: face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(1 Suppl):1–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aston S (1998) The FAME facelift: finger assisted malar elevation. In: The cutting edge. Aesthetic Surgery Symposium, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graf R, Groth A, Pace D, Neto L (2008) Facial rejuvenation with SMASectomy and FAME using vertical vectors. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baker DC (1997) Lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:509–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mendelson B, Muzaffar A, Adams W (2002) Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(3):885–896; discussion 897–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ozdemir R, Kilinç H, Unlü RE, Uysal AC, Sensöz O, Baran CN (2002) Anatomicohistologic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and use in face lift: retaining ligament correction and SMAS plication. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(4):1134–1147; discussion 1148–1149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aufricht G (1960) Surgery for excess skin of face and neck. In: Wallace A (ed) Transactions II congress international society of plastic surgeons 1959, Livingstone, London, pp 495–502Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamra S (1984) The tri-plane facelift dissection. Ann Plast Surg 12:268–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramirez O (1994) Endoscopic options in facial rejuvenation: an overview. Aesthet Plast Surg 18:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Owsely JQ Jr, Zweifler M (2002) Midface lift of the malar fat pad: technical advances. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):674–685; discussion 686–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Little J (2000) Three dimensional rejuvenation of the midface: volumetric resculpture by malar imbrication. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(1):267–285; discussion 286–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friel M, Shaw R, Trovato M et al (2010) The measure of facelift patient satisfaction: the Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey with a long term follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:243–257Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jockey Salud Medical CenterLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations