Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1340–1346 | Cite as

An Autoprosthesis Technique for Better Breast Projection in Free Nipple Graft Reduction Mammaplasty

  • Cemal Fırat
  • Ali Gurlek
  • Serkan Erbatur
  • Ahmet Hamdi Aytekin
Original Article Breast

Abstract

Background

Reduction mammaplasty for macromastia provides relief from uncomfortable symptoms and improves self-confidence and the ability to participate in sports activities. Reduction mammaplasty using the free nipple graft technique may result in bottoming-out deformity and a lack of upper-pole projection. We describe a modified breast reduction technique that combines the Graf and Thorek methods.

Methods

We operated on 26 patients with gigantomastia using this novel technique. Preoperative markings were planned according to the classic Thorek amputation technique using a Wise pattern. A 10-cm × 14-cm pyramidal inferior-based dermoglandular flap was prepared, passed under a transverse pectoral muscle loop, and then back-folded over the pectoral loop, thereby establishing an autoprosthesis to increase upper-pole fullness and prevent bottoming-out deformity.

Results

The average weight of the removed breast tissue was 1,634 g (range = 1,120–2,140 g) for the right breast and 1,630 g (range = 1,110–2,120 g) for the left breast. The average follow-up period was 22 months (range = 11–37 months). All samples were pathologically assessed. Minor complications included wound breakdown at the T-junction, fat necrosis, hypertrophic scarring, and partial necrosis of the nipple–areola complex (NAC). Loss of nipple projection and partial hypopigmentation of the NAC occurred in most patients. Mild glandular ptosis was observed in two patients, with no flattening or deflation, but no severe bottoming-out deformity was observed during long-term follow-up.

Conclusions

All patients were happy with their new bra size, breast projection, and breast weight. Our combined autoprosthesis technique resulted in satisfactory long-term breast projection and upper-pole fullness.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Free nipple graft Reduction mammaplasty Breast projection Autoprosthesis 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest or funding for the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown DM, Young VL (1993) Reduction mammoplasty for macromastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 17:211–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manstein ME, Manstein CH, Manstein G (1997) Obtaining projection in the amputation free nipple/areolar graft breast reduction without a vertical scar using breast parenchyma to create a new mound. Ann Plast Surg 38:421–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ozerdem OR, Anlatici R, Maral T, Demiralay A (2002) Modified free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty to increase breast projection with superior and inferior dermoglandular flaps. Ann Plast Surg 49:506–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorgu M, Ayhan M, Aytug Z, Aksungur E, Demirdover C (2007) Maximizing breast projection with combined free nipple graft reduction mammoplasty and back-folded dermaglandular inferior pedicle. Breast J 12:226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirshowitz B, Moscona AR (1982) Modification of the bipedicled vertical dermal flap technique in reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 8:363–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casas LA, Byun MY, Depoli PA (2001) Maximizing breast projection after free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isken T, Sen C, Onyedi M, Izmirli H (2008) A new application for increasing breast projection in free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:675–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graf R, Biggs T, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24:348–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hawtof DB, Levine M, Kapetansky DI, Pieper D (1989) Complications of reduction mammaplasty: comparison of nipple-areolar graft and pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 23:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thorek M (1922) Possibilities in the reconstruction of the human. NY Med J 116:572–575Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mess SA, Gradinger GP, Spear SL (2006) Breast reduction with the free-nipple technique. In: Spear AL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1172–1188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katsaros J, Harvey I, Caplash Y (2010) The triplicated inferior pedicle—a new method for breast reduction and mastopexy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1131–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson IT, Bayramicli M, Gupta M, Yavuzer R (1999) Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:398–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple-areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ribeiro L (1975) A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:300–334Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graf R, Biggs TM (2002) In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:309–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graf R, Reis de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG, Pace DT, Biggs T (2003) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy using the vertical scar and thoracic wall flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:6–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Güven E, Aydin H, Başaran K, Aydin U, Kuvat SV (2010) Reduction mammoplasty using bipedicled dermoglandular flaps and free-nipple transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:738–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abramson DL (1999) Increasing projection in patients undergoing free nipple graft reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23:282–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karsidag S, Akcal A, Karsidag T, Yesiloglu N, Yesilada AK, Ugurlu K (2011) Reduction mammaplasty using the free-nipple-graft vertical technique for severe breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the superior dermaglandular flap. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:254–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romano JJ, Francel TJ, Hoopes JE (1992) Free nipple graft reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 28:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koger KE, Sunde D, Press BHJ (1994) Reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia using an inferiorly based pedicle and free nipple transplantation. Ann Plast Surg 33:514–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neuprez A, Haykal S, Calteux N (1999) The use of an inferior dermoglandular flap in Thorek’s technique, based on a series of 21 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 44:231–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brown RH, Izaddoost S, Bullocks JM (2010) Preventing the “bottoming out” and “star-gazing” phenomena in inferior pedicle breast reduction with an acellular dermal matrix internal brassiere. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:760–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ho-Asjoe M, Mallucci P (2004) Professional tattooing—alternative method to nipple reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 57:185–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katerinaki E, Sircar T, Sterne GD (2011) The C-V flap for nipple reconstruction after previous skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: refinements of donor-site closure. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:624–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen CM, Warren SM, Isik FF (2003) Innovations to the vertical reduction mammaplasty: making the transition. Ann Plast Surg 50:579–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cemal Fırat
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ali Gurlek
    • 2
  • Serkan Erbatur
    • 1
  • Ahmet Hamdi Aytekin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryInonu University School of MedicineMalatyaTurkey
  2. 2.Estenatura Plastic Surgery ClinicIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryTurgut Ozal Medical Center, Inonu University School of MedicineMalatyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations