Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications
- 1.4k Downloads
Incisions for insertion of breast implants are most commonly placed in the inframammary fold, areola, or axilla. Previous studies have evaluated selection of incision location preoperatively and for nipple–areola complex sensation retention after primary augmentation mammaplasty. This study compares the most common postoperative complications for each incision location in patients who underwent primary breast augmentation.
A retrospective chart review was performed on 619 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation, excluding simultaneous mastopexy, within a single group practice from July 1994 to June 2009. Incision location, postoperative complications (capsular contracture, hematoma formation, rippling, infection, and rupture), and total reoperation rates were recorded. Incision locations were also compared with respect to implant fill type (saline or silicone gel) and pocket location (subglandular or submuscular).
A statistically significant association was identified between total reoperation and incision location (p = 0.0054). The highest rate of total reoperation occurred when using an inframammary fold incision compared to either the transaxillary or periareolar. This relationship with total reoperation was not attributed to the five complications analyzed, but rather with patient desire for size/style change, asymmetry, or ptosis. No statistically significant association was observed between incision location and specific complications such as capsular contracture, rippling, implant rupture, hematoma, or infection.
None of the five complications analyzed correlated with incision location. The data generated from this study will assure the surgeon that all three incision locations are safe. Preoperative examination, patient preference, and surgeon comfort should remain the mainstays of incision planning in augmentation mammaplasty.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsBreast augmentation Breast augmentation incision Breast augmentation complications Capsular contracture
The authors thank Dr. T. Roderick Hester, Dr. Foad Nahai, Dr. Farzad Nahai, and Paces Plastic Surgery for allowing the use of patient data in this study.
Conflict of Interest
M. A. Codner has served as a consultant to Mentor Worldwide LLC. He has also received educational grants from Mentor and receives royalties for books published by Quality Medical Publishing and Elsevier Publishing Company. R. L. Stutman, A. Mahoney, and A. Amei have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.Cosmetic Surgery National Databank Statistics (2010) American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Stats2010_1.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
- 3.Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the trans-axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:371Google Scholar
- 6.Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36(1):49–61, viGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bengston BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK et al (2007) Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(Suppl 1):40SGoogle Scholar
- 16.Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group (2007) Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(Suppl 1):8S–16S; discussion 17S–18SGoogle Scholar
- 23.Allen S (2004) FDA breast implant consumer handbook—2004. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 24.Transcript of the FDA Panel, Mentor hearings (April 2005). http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/transcripts/2005-4101t3.doc. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
- 25.FDA Summary Panel Memorandum: Mentor P030053. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4101b1_Tab-1_fda-Mentor%20Panel%20Memo.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
- 30.Snell L, Brown M (2009) Breast implant capsules and subclinical infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4S):38Google Scholar
- 31.Tran VT, Del Pozo JL, Petty PM et al (2009) Bacteria on breast implants are associated with capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4S):38–39Google Scholar