Effects of the Magnetic Resonance Field on Breast Tissue Expanders
- 518 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
Background
Tissue expansion for breast reconstruction after mastectomy is a safe and effective procedure. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan can be requested for patients with a breast expander to evaluate concurrent diseases. The electromagnetic field of the MR can interfere with biomedical devices, resulting in potential hazards, compromising the diagnosis, or creation of artifacts.
Methods
Four tissue expanders with an integrated magnetic valve were tested. The temperature increase was measured using an infrared camera in the MR scanner. The expanders were tested (half-full and full of saline solution) both free in air and immersed in a phantom. The ferromagnetic properties of the devices were assessed using the deflection angle method. To evidence artifacts due to the presence of the expander, MR images were acquired for expanders tested in air and in the phantom. A valve localization test was performed after MRI analysis.
Results
A slight increase in temperature was demonstrated, without any clinical significance. The deflection angle due to the magnetic field depends on the distance from the bore of the magnet. The angle is higher when the device is closer to the bore. The presence of the magnetic valve influences the MRI signal, creating artifacts on the acquired images, even far from the valve itself. The valve localization test allowed verification of correct valve functioning for all the expanders after the MRI analysis.
Conclusions
Under selected conditions, MRI scans can be feasible. Heating is not expected to be a major concern, whereas valve displacement could happen in certain clinical conditions. The presence of artifacts is almost unavoidable.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Keywords
Breast MRI Breast reconstruction Breast reconstruction expanders Diagnostic MRI Tissue expansionReferences
- 1.Nava MB, Spano A, Cadenelli P, Colombetti A, Menozzi A, Pennati A, Catanuto G (2008) Extraprojected implants as an alternative surgical model for breast reconstruction: implantation strategy and early results. Breast 17:361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Nava MB, Catanuto G, Pennati A, Garganese G, Spano A (2009) Conservative mastectomies. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:681–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nyenhuis JA, Kildishev AV, Athey TW, Bourland JD, Foster KS, Graber GP (1999) Heating near implanted medical devices by the MRI RF-magnetic field. Magnetics Conference, Digest of INTERMAG 99. 1999 IEEE InternationalGoogle Scholar
- 4.Nyenhuis JA, Park SM, Kamondetdacha R, Amjad A, Shellock FG, Rezai AR (2005) MRI and implanted medical devices: basic interactions with an emphasis on heating. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 5:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sawyer-Glover AM, Shellock FG (2000) Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:92–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Duffy FJ Jr, May JW Jr (1995) Tissue expanders and magnetic resonance imaging: the “hot” breast implant. Ann Plast Surg 35:647–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Zegzula HD, Lee WP (2001) Infusion port dislodgement of bilateral breast tissue expanders after MRI. Ann Plast Surg 46:46–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ascherman JA (2004) Reversal of expander port polarity following magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:817PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fagan LL, Shellock FG, Brenner RJ, Rothman B (1995) Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 5:614–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Stueber K (1997) A complication of tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1464–1465PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.ASTM International (2009) Designation F 2182-09: Standard test method for measurement of radiofrequency-induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imagingGoogle Scholar
- 12.ASTM International (2006) Designation F 2052-06: Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environmentGoogle Scholar
- 13.Shellock FG (2002) Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:721–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.ASTM International (2006) Designation F 2213-06: Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced torque on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environmentGoogle Scholar
- 15.ASTM International (2007) Designation F 2119-07: Test method for evaluation of mr images artifacts from passive implantsGoogle Scholar
- 16.ASTM International (2008) Designation F 2503-08: Practice for marking medical devices and other items for safety in the magnetic resonance imagingGoogle Scholar
- 17.Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, Haid RW (1993) Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. Radiology 187:855–856PubMedGoogle Scholar