Control of Postoperative Pain with a Wearable Continuously Operating Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy Device: A Preliminary Study
- 437 Downloads
Pulsed radiofrequency energy (PRFE) has long been reported to have a therapeutic effect on postoperative pain. In this study, a portable, wearable, low-energy-emitting PRFE therapy device was used to determine the control of postoperative pain after breast augmentation surgery.
The study enrolled 18 healthy women who underwent breast augmentation purely for aesthetic considerations. Postoperative pain after surgery was assessed with a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Baseline pain scores were taken at completion of the operation, and the patients were randomly assigned coded PRFE devices that were either active or placebo devices. For 7 days, VAS scores were recorded twice daily (a.m. and p.m.). Medication use also was logged for 7 days. The PRFE devices were left in place and in continuous operation for the 7 days of the study.
All the patients tolerated the PRFE therapy well, and no side effects were reported. The VAS scores for the active group were significantly lower on postoperative day 1. By day 7, the baseline VAS remaining in the active group was 7.9% versus 38% in the placebo group. Together with lower VAS scores, narcotic pain medication use was lower in the patient group that received PRFE therapy.
Postoperative pain is significantly lower with PRFE therapy. According to the findings, PRFE therapy in this form is an excellent, safe, drug-free method of postoperative pain control.
KeywordsPain Postoperative Pulsed radiofrequency
Conflict of interest
David G. Genecov received honoraria from BioElectronics Corporation for the study. Ian M. Rawe is a paid consultant for BioElectronics Corporation.
- 11.Benazzo F, Zanon G, Pederzini L, Modonesi F, Cardile C, Falez F, Ciolli L, La Cava F, Giannini S, Buda R et al (2008) Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Itoh M, Montemayor JS Jr, Matsumoto E, Eason A, Lee MH, Folk FS (1991) Accelerated wound healing of pressure ulcers by pulsed high-peak power electromagnetic energy (Diapulse). Decubitus 4(24–25):29–34Google Scholar
- 20.Salzberg CA, Cooper-Vastola SA, Perez F, Viehbeck MG, Byrne DW (1995) The effects of nonthermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Manage 41:42–44, 46, 48 passimGoogle Scholar
- 25.Rawe IM, Vlahovic TC (2011) The use of a portable, wearable form of pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic energy device for the healing of recalcitrant ulcers: a case report. Int Wound J. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00853.x
- 30.Moffett J, Griffin N, Ritz M, George F (2010) Pulsed radiofrequency energy field treatment of cells in culture results in increased expression of genes involved in the inflammation phase of lower extremity diabetic wound healing. J Diabet Foot Complicat 2:57–64Google Scholar
- 33.Gilron I, Orr E, Tu D, Mercer CD, Bond D (2009) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, meloxicam, and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 108:623–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar