Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 244–247

Preservation of the Nasal Valve Area With a Lateral Crural Hinged Flap: A Cadaveric Study

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Overresection of the lateral crura of the lower lateral cartilages is referred to as the most common cause of nasal valve collapse after rhinoplasty. The modern approach to functional rhinoplasty recognizes the importance of the tip framework’s structural integrity and preserves tip support.

Methods

Traditional cephalic resections of lateral crura were performed on one side of five adult cadaver noses. On the opposite sides, hinged flaps of lateral crura were created. The noses were cross-sectioned at or near the internal nasal valve level, and the difference between the two sides was described.

Results

The study findings demonstrated improvement in the postoperation nasal valve area of the hinged flap side compared with the cephalic trim side.

Conclusions

This preliminary study showed that the hinged flap is an option in nasal tip reduction surgery that may provide improved long-term aesthetic and functional outcomes through preservation of the nasal valve area.

Keywords

Alar cartilage Nasal valve area Rhinoplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Adamson PA, Funk E (2009) Nasal tip dynamics. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 17:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adamson PA, Litner JA, Dahiya R (2006) The M-Arch model: a new concept of nasal tip dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:16–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruintjes TD, Olphen AF, Hillen B, Weijs WA (1996) Electromyography of the human nasal muscles. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253:464–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deroee AF, Younes AA, Friedman O (2011) External nasal valve collapse repair: the limited alar-facial stab approach. Laryngoscope 121:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalan A, Kenyon GS, Seemungal TA (2001) Treatment of external nasal valve (alar rim) collapse with an alar strut. J Laryngol Otol 115:788–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim DW, Rodriguez-Bruno K (2009) Functional rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 17:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mlynski G, Grützenmacher S, Plontke S, Mlynski B, Lang C (2001) Correlation of nasal morphology and respiratory function. Rhinology 39:197–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Most SP (2008) Trends in functional rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 10:410–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murakami CS, Barrera JE, Most SP (2009) Preserving structural integrity of the alar cartilage in aesthetic rhinoplasty using a cephalic turn-in flap. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11:126–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nigro CE, Nigro JF, Mion O, Mello JF (2009) Nasal valve: anatomy and physiology. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 75:305–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sazgar AA (2010) Horizontal reduction using a cephalic hinged flap of the lateral crura: a method to treat the bulbous nasal tip. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:642–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sazgar AA (2010) Lateral crural setback with cephalic turn-in flap: a method to treat the drooping nose. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12:427–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir A. Sazgar
    • 1
  • Charles Woodard
    • 2
  • Sam P. Most
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vali-Asr Hospital, Imam Khomeini Medical ComplexTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations