Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 608–616 | Cite as

The Dermal Suspension Sling: Shaping the Inferior Pedicle during Breast Reduction

Innovative Techniques



Complaints following reduction mammaplasty using the inferior pedicle include the migration of the deep tissue, a lack of medial fullness, poor projection, and bottoming-out. These are attributed to the lack of deep tissue suspension and skin envelope relaxation. We address these issues through horizontal dermal suspension and plication of the inferior pedicle.


The inferior pedicle is designed with medial and lateral triangular flaps in the areas, which would normally be excised. These triangular flaps are deepithelialized and defatted. The flaps are attached to the chest wall above the inferior pedicle to create a dermal sling. The breast mound is further contoured by horizontally plicating the dermis below the nipple–areola complex (NAC), which creates projection and rotates the NAC into the desired position in relation to the chest wall.


Sixty-six women have undergone breast reduction using the horizontal dermal suspension sling modification to the inferior pedicle breast reduction technique. Breast projection and shape were sustained during follow-up, of which the median interval was 16 months.


Dermal suspension and horizontal dermal plication provides a structural foundation to the inferior pedicle. The sling-like effect from the dermal suspension maintains a defined inframammary fold and maintains medial and lateral borders of the breast. Horizontal dermal plication shortens the length of the inferior pedicle while generating improved breast projection by rotating the NAC anteriorly. The firmly shaped inferior pedicle breast mound allows the skin flap to drape over the breast mound with minimal tension.


Inferior pedicle breast reduction Dermal suspension Dermal sling Breast reduction Reduction mammoplasty Inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty Dermal plication dermal flaps 


  1. 1.
    Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of the breast tissue. Aesthet Plast Surg 5:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Góes JC, Landecker A, Lyra EC, Góes RS, Godoy PM (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hinderer UT (1978) Mammaplasty: the dermal brassiere technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 2:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvo Z (1997) Mammaplasty for mild and/or ptotic breast through short incision at the inframammary sulcus: a personal approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:352–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lockwood T (1999) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy with superficial fascial system suspension. Ann Plast Surg 103:1411–1420Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aydin H, Tumerdem B, Onel D, Cerci-Ozkan A (2003) Reduction mammaplasty using inferior pedicle technique combined with dermal suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1362–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yuksel E, Marin V, Bienstock A, Weinfeld AB, Spira M, Shenaq SM (2004) Dermal suspension: an adjunct in reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. In: 17th Congress of the international society of aesthetic plastic surgery, vol 17, p 139Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuksel E, Marin V, Weinfeld AB, Shenaq SM, Spira M (2004) “Vertical scarless” reduction mammaplasty. In: 17th Congress of the international society of aesthetic plastic surgery, vol 17, p 91Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frey M (1999) A new technique of reduction mammaplasty: dermis suspension and elimination of medial scars. Br J Plast Surg 52:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baumeister RG (2003) Curtain type combined pedicle reduction mammoplasty with internal suspension for extensive hypertrophic and ptotic breasts. Br J Plast Surg 56:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson RA, Colohan SM, Sigurdson LJ, Lalonde DH (2008) Practice profiles in breast reduction: a survey among Canadian plastic surgeons. Can J Plast Surg 16:157–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox JW IV (2005) Superior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 25:406–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKissock PK (1972) Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:245–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perbeck L, Proano E, Määttänen H (1991) Skin circulation in the nipple after reduction mammaplasty with a bipedicle vertical dermal flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 25:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramon Y, Sharony Z, Moscona RA, Ullmann Y, Peled IJ (2000) Evaluation and comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with bilateral breast reduction using the inferior pedicle and McKissock’s vertical bipedicle dermal flap techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:289–295; discussion 295–297Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirshowitz B, Moscona RA (1982) Modification of the bipedicle vertical dermal flap technique in reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 8:363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Passot R (1931) Correction esthétique de la ptose mammaire. In: Doin G (ed) Chirurgie Esthetique: Technique et Resultats. G. Doin & Co, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lejour M, Abboud M, Declety A, Kertesz P (1990) Reduction of mammaplasty scars: from a short inframammary scar to a vertical scar. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 35:369–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leone MS, Franchelli S, Berrino P, Santi PL (1997) Vertical mammaplasty: a personal approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palumbo SK, Shifren J, Rhee C (1998) Modifications of the Lejour vertical mammaplasty: analysis of results in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 40:354–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ribeiro L (1975) A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thorek M (1942) Plastic surgery of the breast and the abdominal wall. Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maliniac JW (1949) Evaluation of principal mammaplastic procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 4:359Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lalonde DH, Lalonde J, French R (2003) The no vertical scar breast reduction: a minor variation that allows you to remove vertical scar portion of the inferior pedicle Wise pattern T scar. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perez-Macias JM (2004) Personal mastopexy technique for breast stabilization: update. Br J Plast Surg 57(2):178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chun YS, Lalonde DH, May JW Jr (2007) Internal pedicle shaping to improve aesthetics results in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1183–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas WO, Moline S, Harris CN (1998) Design-enhanced breast reduction: an approach for very large, very ptotic breasts without a vertical incision. Ann Plast Surg 40:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plastic Surgery DivisionBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations