Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 313–321 | Cite as

Augmentation Mastopexy in Muscle-Splitting Biplane: Outcome of First 44 Consecutive Cases of Mastopexies in a New Pocket

  • Umar Daraz KhanEmail author
Original Article



Augmentation with mastopexy is a commonly performed procedure and is done either simultaneously or in stages. The augmentation component can be accomplished by placing an implant in the subglandular, partial submuscular, or subfascial plane, and mastopexy can be performed using periareolar, vertical, or Wise pattern markings. These two components are independent of each other and any pocket can be combined with suitable external markings. The muscle-splitting submuscular biplane is a new pocket and is combined with conventional envelope reductions for mastopexy.


The submuscular biplane pocket was used in 44 consecutive patients for mastopexy and augmentation using vertical scar and periareolar markings. Of these, 13 had subglandular augmentation in the past. The mean age of the patients was 32.4 years (range = 21–46). Average blood loss was 44 g (range = 10–111 g). Drains were used selectively and the procedure was usually done as a day case.


The follow-up period of the included cases ranged from 4 months to 3 years. No infection, hematoma, or wound problems were seen. Minor revision was required for periareolar puckering in one case and three had dog-ears after vertical scar mastopexy. One periareolar mastopexy required conversion into a vertical scar as a revision and one vertical scar mastopexy had superficial infection with bilateral minor skin breakdown which responded completely to antibiotics.


The submuscular biplane technique is a good option for breast augmentation with mastopexy as a single or staged procedure.


Breast augmentation Vertical scar mastopexy Periareolar mastopexy Submuscular biplane technique 


  1. 1.
    Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: 3rd international congress of plastic surgery, excerpta medica international congress series no. 66. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Regnault P (1977) Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LR, Damasio RC, Auersvald A (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Binelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammoplasty: “ the round block” technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartels RJ, Strickland DM, Douglas WM (1976) A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis. Plast Reconstructr Surg 57:687–691Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wise RL (1956) Preliminary report on a method of planning the mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Clinic Plast Surg 3:193–203Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan UD (2006) Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. In: 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Opatja-Rijeka, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:353–358Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan UD (2008) Use of rectus sternalis in augmentation mammoplasty: case report and literature search. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:21–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan UD (2009) Auto-inflation with sterile pus as a marker of implant rupture: single stage treatment and outcome of five consecutive cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:58–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elliott LF (2002) Circumareolar mastopexy with augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 29:337–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD (2005) The ballooning maneuver in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gasperoni C, Slagarello M, Gargani G (1998) Experience and technical refinements in “donut” mastopexy with augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 12:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mottura AA (2007) Periareolar mastopexy and augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 27:450–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hircsh EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? a review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Becker H, Hartog J (2006) Augmentation mastopexy using adjustable implants with external injection dome. Aesthet Surg J 26:736–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biggs TM, Yarish RS (1990) Augmentation mammoplasty: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:368–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammoplasty. A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spears SL, Little JW III (1988) Breast capsulorraphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Becker H, Storm van Leeuwen JB (1990) The correction of breast ptosis with expander mammary prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 24:489–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khan UD (2009) Selection of breast pocket using the pinch test in augmentation mammoplasty: can it be relied on in the long term? Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:780–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using muscle splitting biplane technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cormack GC, Lamberty BG (1994) The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 168 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spear SL (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: “surgeon, beware”. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 suppl):133S–134SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burkhardt BR, Fried M, Schnur PL, Tolfield JJ (1981) Capsules, infection and intraluminal antibiotics. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:43–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KentUK

Personalised recommendations