Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 600–604 | Cite as

The Bilobed Flap for Reconstruction of Distal Nasal Defect in Asians

  • Chun-Yu Xue
  • Li Li
  • Ling-Li Guo
  • Jun-Hui Li
  • Xin Xing
Original Article



The aim of this study was to overcome nasal alar retraction that occurs with the use of the standard Zitelli’s bilobed flap for reconstruction of a distal nasal defect. Zitelli’s bilobed flap offers the ability to aesthetically reconstruct difficult defects in the distal nasal area. However, the standard Zitelli bilobed flap may sometimes result in nasal alar retraction which is likely to the result of excessive tension upon closure of the primary lobe and primary defect.


We modified the bilobed flap based on the design of the standard Zitelli bilobed flap. The modification of the bilobed flap was designed to have a primary lobe that was 10% longer than the length of the distal defect edge from the flap’s pivot point, and the width of the primary lobe was equal to the width of the defect. The length of the secondary lobe was 130% of the length of the distal defect edge to the flap’s pivot point, and the width of the secondary lobe was two-thirds the width of the primary lobe. To make a slight downward displacement of the ipsilateral alar margin, the primary lobe was transposed to fill the primary defects.


The results of the reconstruction were satisfactory: there was good nasal contour and appropriate symmetry of the nasal tip and no alar retraction.


The modification of Zitelli’s bilobed flap to have a longer primary lobe, which slightly displaced downward the ipsilateral alar margin intraoperatively, can prevent nasal alar retraction in the reconstruction of distal nasal defects in Asians.


Bilobed flap Distal nasal defect Alar retraction 


  1. 1.
    Cook JL (2005) Reconstructive utility of the bilobed flap: lessons from flap successes and failures. Dermatol Surg 31:1024–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zimany A (1953) The bi-lobed flap. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 11:424–434Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zitelli JA (1989) The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol 125:957–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moy RL, Grossfeld JS, Baum M, Rivlin D, Eremia S (1994) Reconstruction of the nose utilizing a bilobed flap. Int J Dermatol 33:657–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dzubow LM (1987) The dynamics of flap movement: effect of pivotal restraint on flap rotation and transposition. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13:1348–1353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh DJ, Bartlett SP (2003) Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:639–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ (1985) The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook JL (2000) A review of the bilobed flap’s design with particular emphasis on the minimization of alar displacement. Dermatol Surg 26:354–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aasi SZ, Leffell DJ (2005) Bilobed transposition flap. Dermatol Clin 23:55–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-Yu Xue
    • 1
  • Li Li
    • 1
  • Ling-Li Guo
    • 1
  • Jun-Hui Li
    • 1
  • Xin Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryChanghai Hospital, Second Military Medical UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations