Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 661–665

Correction of Septal and Midface Hypoplasia in Maxillonasal Dysplasia (Binder’s Syndrome) Using High-Density Porous Polyethylene

  • Tamer Seyhan
  • Beyza Hancioglu Kircelli
  • Baris Caglar
Case Report

Abstract

Background

Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome) is a congenital malformation characterized by an extremely flat and retruded nose.

Methods

This report describes an 18-year-old woman with maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). The septal deficiencies and maxillary retrusion of the patient were corrected by using an L-shaped implant and a crescent-shaped high-density porous polyethylene implant through the oral vestibular sulcus via an external rhinoplasty approach.

Results

After the operation, the tip of the nose had moved 5.5 mm anteriorly in the sagittal plane and 11.9 mm coronally in the vertical plane. Also, the nasolabial angle had increased after the surgery. Follow-up evaluation at 24 months showed good correction of the nasal and midface projection.

Conclusions

High-density porous polyethylene implants are a good alternative for patients with Binder’s syndrome, especially those who will not accept costal cartilage grafts or orthognathic surgery and who have tendency for hypertrophic scarring.

Keywords

Binder’s syndrome Midface retrusion Porous polyethylene 

References

  1. 1.
    Berghaus A (1985) Porous polyethylene in reconstructive head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 111:154–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binder KH (1962) Dysostosis maxillo-nasalis: ein archinencephaler Missbildungskomplex. Deutsche Zahnarztuche Zeitschift 17:438–444Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Converse JM (1950) Restoration of facial contour by bone grafts introduced through the oral cavity. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 6:295–300Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Converse JM, Horowitz SL, Valauri AJ, Montandon D (1970) The treatment of nasomaxillary hypoplasia: a new pyramidal naso-orbital mazillary osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:527–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draf W, Bockmühl U, Hoffmann B (2003) Nasal correction in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome): a long term follow-up study. Br J Plast Surg 56:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyer FM, Willmot DR (2002) Maxillo-nasal dysplasia, Binder’s syndrome: review of the literature and case report. J Orthod 29:15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gürlek A, Celik M, Fariz A, Ersöz-Oztürk A, Eren AT, Tenekeci G (2006) The use of high-density porous polyethylene as a custom-made nasal spreader graft. Aesth Plast Surg 30:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmström H (1986) Surgical correction of the nose and midface in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 78:568–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holmström H, Kahnberg KE (1988) Surgical approach in severe cases of maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). Swed Dent J 12:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horswell BB, Holmes AD, Barnett JS, Levant BA (1987) Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome): a critical review and case study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:114–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karnes J, Salisbury M, Schaeferle M et al (2000) Porous high-density polyethylene implants (Medpor) for nasal dorsum augmentation. Aesth Surg J 20:26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monasterio FO, Molina F, McClintock JS (1997) Nasal correction in Binder’s syndrome: the evolution of a treatment plan. Aesth Plast Surg 21:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Munro IR, Sinclair WJ, Rudd NL (1979) Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 63:657–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niechajev I (1999) Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies. Aesth Plast Surg 23:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okazaki M, Sarukawa S, Fukuda N (2005) A patient with congenital defect of nasal cartilaginous septal and vomeral bone reconstructed with costal cartilaginous graft. J Craniofac Surg 16:819–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olow-Nordenram M, Thilander B (1989) The craniofacial morphology in persons with maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder syndrome): a longitudinal cephalometric study of orthodontically treated children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:148–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ragnell A (1952) A simple method of reconstruction in some cases of dish-face deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 10:227–237Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romo TIII, Sclafani AP, Sabini P (1998) Reconstruction of the major saddle nose deformity using composite allo-implants. Facial Plast Surg 14:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rune B, Aberg M (1998) Bone grafts to the nose in Binder’s syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia): a follow-up of eleven patients with the use of profile roentgenograms. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:297–304 (discussion 305–306)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tessier P, Tulasne JF, Delaire J, Resche F (1981) Therapeutic aspects of maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder syndrome). Head Neck Surg 3:207–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamer Seyhan
    • 1
  • Beyza Hancioglu Kircelli
    • 2
  • Baris Caglar
    • 3
  1. 1.Medical FacultyBaskent UniversityAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of DentistryBaskent UniversityAdanaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBaskent UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations