Advertisement

Photogrammetric Facial Analysis of Attractive Korean Entertainers

  • Seung Chul Rhee
  • Eun Sang Dhong
  • Eul Sik Yoon
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The authors have developed a new digital photogrammetric method of facial analysis known as balanced angular and proportional analysis (BAPA). Using BAPA, the authors analyzed the faces of attractive Korean entertainers.

Methods

The BAPA approach involves 28 landmarks and 14 measurements (10 proportional and 4 angular measures). Standardized mean angular values of famous entertainers are referred to as recommended aesthetic mean angles (RAMA) and the mean proportional values as the recommended aesthetic mean proportions (RAMP). In this study, 30 frontal views of famous Korean entertainers (15 men and 15 women) were collected from Internet Web pages, and the data analyzed using V-ceph. A t test (with the significance level set at a p value of 0.05) was performed to analyze male versus female comparisons.

Results

Significant between-group differences (p < 0.05) were found for P-lower face, P-eye height, P-lip, P-interangle, and the mandibular contour in the frontal views. Famous Korean female entertainers differ from famous male entertainers. The women have a shorter lower face, larger eyes, smaller lips, and a more slender and oval shape of the mandibular soft tissue contour.

Conclusions

The authors insist that facial analysis should take into consideration racial, ethnic, and gender differences. The BAPA approach is a new practical and simple method for photogrammetric facial analysis. Using the authors’ method, more advanced and automated computer systems for analyzing human faces may be developed.

Keywords

Attractiveness Facial analysis Photogrammetry Racial difference Sexual dimorphisms 

References

  1. 1.
    Lew KK, Soh G, Loh E (1992) Ranking of facial profile among Asians. J Esthet Dent 4(4):128–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhatia AF (1989) Facial profile aesthetics and acceptance. Indian J Dent Res 1(2–3):45–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romm S (1989) The changing face of beauty. Aesth Plast Surg 13(12):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368(6468):239–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auger TA, Turley PK (1999) The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14:7–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michiels G, Sather AH (1994) Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthognath Surg 9(2):95–103Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mafi P, Ghazisaeidi MR, Mafi A (2005) Ideal soft tissue facial profile in Iranian females. J Craniofac Surg 16(3):508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho HJ, Hwang K (2002) Was the beauty of Chosun dynasty different from that of Japanese Edo dynasty or present Korea? Anthropometric analysis of portraits. J Korean Soc Aesth Plast Surg 8(2):91–98Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee DJ, Kim WK, Kim SS (1989) Photogrammetric study on the face of adult Korean female. J Korean Soc Plast Surg 16(3):423Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho DH, Ham KS, Cho YJ (1989) An anthropometric values and standardized templates of Korean face and head. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 16(6):926Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cho JC, Han KH, Kang JS (1993) Normal anthropometric values and standardized templates of Korean face and head. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 20:995Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wee SS, Ham KS, Lee JU (1981) Anthropometrical studies on the standard beauty of Korean adult female. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 8:283Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee JS, Kim HK, Kim YW (2004) Anthropometric analysis of the attractive and normal faces in Korean female. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31:526Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhee SC, Kang SR, Park HS (2004) Balanced angular profile analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park HS, Rhee SC, Kang SR, Lee JH (2004) Harmonized profiloplasty using balanced angular profile analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 28:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    You SC, Ahn HR, Jung HM et al (2005) The secret of Hallyu. Thinking Tree Publishing Co, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farkas LG, Kolar JC (1987) Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women’s face. Clin Plast Surg 14:599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA (1978) Profilometrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 73:648–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park SH (2005) Clinical cephalometry in plastic surgery, 1st edn. Koonja Publishing Co., Seoul, pp 203–229Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lehman JA Jr (1987) Soft tissue manifestations of aesthetic defects of the jaws: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 14:767–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jefferson Y (2004) Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 15(1):9–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Clark A, Lee K, McKay R et al (2002) Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in nonwestern cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30(5):615–625Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsu BS (1983) Comparisons of the five analytic reference lines of the horizontal lip projection: their consistency and sensitivity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Levin LS, Forrest CR (2002) Proportionality in Asian and North Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 26:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klots J (1980) Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg 66:346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG (1999) Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neger M (1959) A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod 45:738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Larrabee WF Jr (1987) Facial analysis for rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 20:653–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bush K, Anonyshyn O (1996) Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:226–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Coward TJ, Watson RM, Scott BJ (1997) Laser scanning for the identification of repeatable landmarks of the ears and face. Br J Plast Surg 50(5):308–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Schmitz JH, Miani AM Jr, Serrario G (1998) A three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis and its application in soft tissue facial morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:404–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stephen R, Marquardt (2005) Marquardt beauty analysis California. http:// www.beautyanalysis.com/. Accessed May 2005
  33. 33.
    Holland E (2008) Marquardt's Phi mask: pitfalls of relying on fashion models and the golden ratio to describe a beautiful face. Aesth Plast Surg 32:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim YH (2007) Easy facial analysis using the facial golden mask. J Craniofac Surg 18:643–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dornaika F, Davoine F, Dang M (2005) 3D head tracking by particle filters. http://www.hds.utc.fr/~fdavoine/faces/. Accessed September 2005
  36. 36.
    Rhee SC, Koo SH (2007) An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness comment. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:757–774, 119:1952–1953Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York, p 20Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hautvast J (1971) Analysis of the human face by means of photogrammetric methods. Anthropol Anz 33:39–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gruendl M (2006) Prototypic female face of high attractiveness. http://www.beautycheck.de/. Accessed May 2006
  40. 40.
    Veale D, De Haro L, Lanbrou L (2003) Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dimorphic disorder. Br J Plast Surg 56:546–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rhee SC (2006) The average Korean attractive face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:729–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seung Chul Rhee
    • 1
  • Eun Sang Dhong
    • 2
  • Eul Sik Yoon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryKEPCO Medical Foundation, Hanil General HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.The Medical Science Research Center of Korea University, Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery InstituteKorea University Ansan HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations