Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, 32:928 | Cite as

Another Look at Breast Projection After Breast Reduction

  • D. A. HudsonEmail author
  • S. Geldenhuys
  • F. Duminy
  • K. Adams
Editorial

Abstract

A controversy exists between vertical mammoplasty and the “traditional” keyhole\inferior pedicle method of breast reduction. This article examines factors affecting breast projection by considering the difference in concept between vertical mammaplasty (using the modification proposed by Hall-Findley as an example) and the inferior pedicle\keyhole pattern. This article is not about “how to do” but rather about “why” things are done in a certain way. The emphasis is on understanding what is done and its effects rather than on technique. The breast can be considered a cone. Breast projection then is the ratio between the nipple projection and the breast base. Two key concepts need to be considered: the orientation of the ellipses during excision of breast tissue in breast reduction and the role of the breast base\inframammary fold. Breast projection is not determined by the scars. After an examination of each technique, methods to enhance projection are discussed.

Keywords

Breast projection Breast reduction Inferior pedicle/keyhole pattern Vertical mammaplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Robeiro L (1975 ) A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCulley SJ, Hudson DA (2001) Short scar breast reduction: why all the fuss? Plast Reconstr Surg 107:965–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall-Findley EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Georgiade GS, Riefkohl RE, Georgiade NG (1989) The inferior dermal-pyramidal type breast reduction: long term evaluation. Ann Plast Surg 23:203–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courtess EH, Goldwyn RM (1977) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:500–507Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari short scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beer GM, Spicher I, Cierpka KA, Meyer VE (2004) Benefits and pitfalls of vertical scar breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 57:12–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hudson DA (1998) Some thoughts on choosing a technique in breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:554–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hidalgo D (2005) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muntan CD, Sundine M, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pickford MA, Boorman JG (1993) Early experience with the Lejour vertical scar mammaplasty technique. Br J Plast Surg 46:516–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Hudson
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Geldenhuys
    • 1
  • F. Duminy
    • 1
  • K. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery H53 OMBGroote Schuur Hospital ObservatoryCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations