Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 286–293

Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty

  • Abdoljalil Kalantar Hormozi
  • Arash Beiraghi Toosi
Original

Abstract

Background

Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the other hand, is mostly subjective, and again, even photographic analyses may not address real changes after rhinoplasty.

Methods

“Rhinometry” is introduced as a clinical method for preoperative evaluations and postoperative judgments, and rhinometric parameters are defined. Measurements of these parameters were performed for 300 patients before rhinoplasty and in the follow-up visits 3 months postoperatively.

Results

Preoperatively, the nasal length and tip projection for most patients were more than ideal. There was moderate reduction in nasal length (mean, 9.21 mm) and a decrease in tip projection (mean, 3.34 mm) for the majority of the patients after rhinoplasty. Reductions in nasal length, tip projection, bony base width, alar base width, and alar base width during a smile were statistically significant. Patients who underwent surgery using the closed approach had significantly more reduction in nasal length and less reduction in tip projection. All the patients were satisfied with these pre- and postoperative data. Rhinometry changed the ideas of the authors about some changes that their operative approaches produce.

Conclusions

Rhinometry can change the ideas of plastic surgeons about the changes their operative approaches accomplish and can be a very useful guide for patients. It is recommended as a part of the pre- and postoperative physical examination of patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

Keywords

Evaluation Outcome Rhinoplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions. Aesth Plast Surg 24:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsarraf R (2002) Outcome instruments in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 18:77–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, et al. (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: A pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bafaqeeh SA (2000) Open rhinoplasty: Effectiveness of different tipplasty techniques to increase nasal projection. Am J Otolaryngol 21:231–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagal AA, Adamson PA (2002) Revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 18:233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bull TR (1983) Rhinoplasty: Aesthetics, ethics, and airway. J Laryngol Otol 97:901–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byrd HS, Burt JD (2002) Dimensional approach to rhinoplasty: Perfecting the aesthetic balance between the nose and chin. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP (eds) Dallas rhinoplasty: Nasal surgery by the masters. 1st ed. Quality Medical Publishing: St. Louis, pp. 118–123Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constantian MB (2006) Closed rhinoplasty: Current techniques, theory, and applications. In: Mathes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, p. 524Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dziewulski P, Dujon D, Spyriounis P, et al. (1995) A retrospective analysis of the results of 218 consecutive rhinoplasties. Br J Plast Surg 48:451–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR (1985) Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:328–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guyuron B, Bukhari F (1996) Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 20:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatric R, et al. (1998) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: The Derriford scale. Br J Plast Surg 51:380–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leong SCL, White PS (2006) A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the healthy Caucasian nose and the aesthetic ideal. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 59:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luce EA (1999) Outcome studies and practice guidelines in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1187–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Most SP, Alsarraf R, Larabee WF (2002) Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures. Facial Plast Surg 18:119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pearson DC, Adamson PA (2004) The ideal nasal profile: Rhinoplasty patients vs the general public. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:257–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rankin M, Borah GL, Perry AW, et al. (1998) Quality of life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2139–2145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rich JS, Friedman WH, Pearlman SJ (1991) The effects of lower lateral cartilage excision on nasal tip projection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:56–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR (2006) Primary rhinoplasty. In: Mathes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, p. 427Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharp HR, Rowe-Jones JM (2003) Assessing outcome in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 28:430–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheen JH (1987) Aesthetic rhinoplasty. 1st ed. Mosby: St. Louis, p. 87Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vuyk HD, Oakenfull C, Plaat RE (1997) A quantitative appraisal of change in nasal tip projection after open rhinoplasty. Rhinology 35:124–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yaremchuk MJ (2006) Facial skeletal augmentation. In: Mathes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, p. 405Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdoljalil Kalantar Hormozi
    • 1
  • Arash Beiraghi Toosi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryShahid Beheshti Medical UniversityTehranIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations