Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 372–379 | Cite as

Anthropometry of the Normal Human Auricle: A Study of Adult Indian Men

  • Ruma PurkaitEmail author
  • Priyanka Singh
Original Article



To treat auricular deformities or to perform facial rejuvenation, a plastic surgeon requires normative data for auricular dimensions. The metric standards vary in various ethnic groups, and such data are especially scarce from in India. This study aimed to provide anthropometric information about the normal dimensions of the adult male auricle in central India.


A cross-sectional study was undertaken in central India with 415 males categorized in five age groups. Six linear dimensions including the length and width of the auricle, lobule, and concha and the heights of the auricular protrusion at the superaurale and tragal levels were measured. Auricular, lobular, and conchal indices were calculated. The inclination of the auricle relative to its vertical axis was measured. Descriptions of various auricle parts including its shape, preauricular area, form of the helical fold, lobular shape, size, and type of attachment to the cheek were recorded.


Almost all the linear measurements showed a steady increase in size with age. The dimensions of the lobule were dependent on its shape and attachment to the cheek. The mean lobular and auricular indices were found to decrease with increasing age, indicating more elongation than widening of the structures. On the average, bilateral asymmetry was observed in all measurements, although only auricular length, width, and conchal length in a few age groups were found to be statistically significant. The frequency distribution of forms of various auricular features is presented.


The human ear continues to grow throughout life. The lobule contributes the most to the overall elongation of the auricle. This study furnishes the first set of metric data of auricular dimensions for normal Indian males 18 to 70 years of age. In comparison with other ethnic groups, Indian males seem to have the smallest auricular and lobular lengths, although their respective widths are comparable with those of others.


Anthropometry Cross-sectional study Indian males Normal human auricle 



The authors are grateful to the subjects for their cooperation during the study, and to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for sponsoring the current study, which is part of the Research Award project. (Sponsored by the University Grant Commission, New Delhi).


  1. 1.
    Azaria R, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D, Hauben DJ: Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: A study of 547 subjects and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2398–2402, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barut C, Aktunc E: Anthropometric measurements of the external ear in a group of Turkish primary school students. Aesth Plast Surg 30:255–259, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beahm EK, Walton RL: Auricular reconstruction for microtia: Part 1. Anatomy, embryology, and clinical evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2473–2482, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Yavuz M, Dere F: Morphometry of the external ear in our adult population. Aesth Plast Surg 30:81–85, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK: A morphometric study of the external ear: Age and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:647–652, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chou CT, Tseng YC, Tsai FJ, Lin CC, Liu CS, Peng CT, Tsai CH: Measurement of ear length in neonates, infants, and preschool children in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 43:40–42, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Della Croce FJ, Green S, Aquilar EF: Framework growth after reconstruction for microtia: Is it real and what are the implications? Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1479–1484, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farkas LG: Ear morphology in Treacher Collin’s, Apert’s, and Crouzon’s syndromes. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 220:153–157, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farkas LG: Anthropometry of normal and anomalous ears. Clin Plast Surg 5:401–412, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farkas LG, Lindsay WK: Ear morphology in cleft lip and palate anomaly. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 206:57–68, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM: Anthropometric growth study of the ear. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:324–329, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Ciusa V, Serrao G, Tartaglia GM: Morphometry of normal human ear: A cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 19:226–233, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gualdi-Russo E: Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with ageing in an urban Italian population. Homo 49:241–259, 1998Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heathcote JA: Why do old men have big ears? BMJ 311:1668, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ito I, Imada M: A morphological study of age changes in adult auricular cartilage with special emphasis on elastic fibres. Laryngoscope 111:881–886, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalcioglu MT, Miman MC, Toplu Y, Yakinci C, Ozturan O: Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediat Otorhinolaryngol 67:1169–1177, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalcioglu MT, Toplu Y, Ozturan O, Yakinci C: Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. Int J Pediat Otorhinolaryng 70:121–127, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knußmann R: Wesen und Methoden der Anthropologie. Band I. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 232–285, 1988Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lakshminarayana P, Janardhan K, David HS: Anthropometry for syndromology. Indian J Pediatr 58:253–258, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mowlavi A, Meldrum G, Wilhelmi BJ, Zook EG: Incidence of earlobe ptosis and pseudoptosis in patients seeking facial rejuvenation surgery and effects of aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:712–717, 2004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pasquali-Ronchetti I, Baccarani-Contri M: Elastic fibre during development and aging. Micros Res Tech 38:428–435, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Preuss S, Eriksson E: Prominent ears. In: Kolk CA (ed) Plastic surgery: Indications, operations, and outcomes. 1st ed. Mosby Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 1057–1065, 2000Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rubin LR, Bromberg BE, Walden RH, Adams A: An anatomic approach to the obtrusive ear. Plast Recostr Surg 29:360–370, 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vogel FG, Motulsky AG: Human genetics: Problem and approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 38–46, 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySaugor UniversitySaugorIndia

Personalised recommendations