Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 688–691 | Cite as

Dermabrasion for Rhytids in the Lateral Canthal Region

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Dermabrasion of the periorbital region has been traditionally contraindicated due to the fear of complications. A method for safe dermabrasion of the lateral canthal region is described. Lateral canthal dermabrasion has the demonstrated advantages of being economical and relatively free of pigmentary problems. The results for 25 consecutive cases with a follow-up period of 12 to 16 months have shown good to excellent results in the majority of cases, with 4 cases requiring further revision. The technique is not intended to replace the gold standard, laserbrasion of the periocular region, and is not demonstrated to be safe for resurfacing of the lower lid region. However, the technique, rapid and easy once the learning curve is completed, was not associated with significant complications in the current series of patients.

Keywords

Dermabrasion Rhytids Eyelid 

References

  1. 1.
    Apfelberg DB: Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser with CPG scanner for full-face resurfacing for rhytids, photoaging, and acne scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1817–1825, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailin PL, Bailin MD: Collagen implantation: Clinical applications and lesion selection. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 14(Suppl 1):21–26, 1988Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhardt BR, Maw R: Are more passes better: Safety versus efficacy with the pulsed CO2 laser. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1531–1534, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chajchir A, Benzaquen I: Carbon dioxide laser resurfacing with fast recovery. Aesth Plast Surg 29:107–112, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ersek RA: Comparative study of dermabrasion, phenol peel, and acetic acid peel. Aesth Plast Surg 15:241–243, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fanous N: A new patient classification for laser resurfacing and peels: Predicting reposes, risks, and results. Aesth Plast Surg 26:99–104, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitzmiller WJ, Viscera M, Page DA, Wicket RR, Kitzmiller KW, Singer LJ: A controlled evaluation of dermabrasion versus CO2 laser resurfacing for the treatment of perioral wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1366–1372, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manaloto RM, Alster TS: Periorbital rejuvenation: A review of dermatologic treatments. Dermatol Surg 25:1–9, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niechajev I, Ljungqvist A: Perioral dermabrasion: Clinical and experimental studies. Aesth Plast Surg 16:11–20, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberts TL III: The emerging role of laser resurfacing in combination with traditional aesthetic facial plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 2:75–80, 1998Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwartz RJ, Burns AJ, Rohrich RJ, Barton IE, Byrd HS: Long-term assessment of CO2 facial laser resurfacing: Aesthetic results and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:592–601, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    West TB, Alster TS: Effect of botulinum toxin type A on movement-associated rhytids following cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing. Lasers Surg Med 25(Suppl 10):7, 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Gruber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Edward Miranda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anuju Antony
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryUniversity of California–San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations