Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 433–436 | Cite as

A Useful Method for Planning Hump Resection of Deviated Nose

  • Asuman Sevin
  • Kutlu Sevin
  • Bulent Erdogan
  • Gokhan Adanali
  • Orgun Deren
Article

Abstract

The deviated nose is a particular challenge because both functional and aesthetic problems must be addressed. A most important challenge is resection of the hump. The nasal bones often are asymmetric in deviated noses. Several methods have been used for resection of the hump. Using the authors’ method, it is possible to calculate the extent of hump resection. Clinical analysis of the nasal deviation is performed preoperatively. Digital photographs are taken, and all the landmarks are marked on the life-size photo prints. Planning begins on the deviated side. The ideal dorsal line is drawn, and the extent of hump resection is planned according to the preoperative measurements. Measurements on the deviated side are applied to the other side using the medial canthi and the most prominent part of the alar creases as landmarks. Classical methods emphasize the importance of the chisel position during hump removal. According to the classical approach, the chisel should be positioned lower on the deviated side to resect more bone. However, there is no method for calculating how the chisel should be positioned exactly during hump resection. Therefore, a precise plan has been devised to leave symmetric nasal bones after hump resection. The authors have applied this method in eight cases, achieving satisfactory results.

Keywords

Deviated nose Hump resection Nasal bones Rhinoplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein L: Submucous operations on the nasal septum. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 6:675, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edwards N: Septoplasty: Rational surgery of the nasal septum. J Laryngol Otol 89:875, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ: Management of the deviated nose. Clin Plast Surg 15:43, 1998Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guyuron B: Precision rhinoplasty. Part I: The role of life-size photographs and soft tissue cephalometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:489, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guyuron B: Precision rhinoplasty. Part II: Prediction. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:500, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP: The deviated nose: Optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1509, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asuman Sevin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kutlu Sevin
    • 2
  • Bulent Erdogan
    • 1
  • Gokhan Adanali
    • 1
  • Orgun Deren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryAnkara Numune Research and Training HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine, Plastic SurgeryAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Asuman SevinAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations