Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 141–149 | Cite as

Correction of the Crooked Nose Using Custom-Made High-Density Porous Polyethylene Extended Spreader Grafts

  • Ali Gürlek
  • Ayse Ersoz-Ozturk
  • Mehmet Celik
  • Cemal Fırat
  • Serkan Aslan
  • Hakan Aydogan
Article

Abstract

Correction of the crooked or deviated nose, a complex cosmetic and functional problem, is a big challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon. Although corrections using a wide range of surgical techniques to straighten the nose and maximize nasal function have been proposed, recurrence is very common because of cartilage memory and scar contracture. Therefore, to prevent recurrence and to maintain the correction of the septum, a permanent support that is stable and strong, with the ability to maintain its given shape after placement on one or both sides of the septum, is needed. For this purpose, the authors planned to use a pair of custom-made high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP) extended spreader grafts. In this study, the concept and technique of HDPP, composed of a nonresorbable alloplastic material for correction of the crooked nose, and the authors’ experience using it, are presented. Currently, HDPP is readily available on the market as a thin plain sheet (0.85 × 38 × 50 mm) that can be cut to an appropriate size for spreader grafts. Ingrowths of fibrous tissue inside and around HDPP stabilize the upper lateral cartilages and septum in their new corrected position and maintain the corrected/straightened position. This material was used in 20 patients with crooked noses (9 with C-type and 11 with S-type noses). During a mean follow-up period of 18 months (range, 8–30 months), there were no complications, recurrences, or extrusions. Functional evaluation was performed using a visual analog scale before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Patients were asked to score their nasal breathing on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. The mean preoperative value was 32.50% ± 11.18%, and the postoperative value was 88.75% ± 8.71%. In conclusion, the use of custom-made HDPP extended spreader grafts is a safe, effective, reliable, and permanent method for correction of the crooked nose. In the long term, the authors believe that custom-made HDPP extended spreader grafts provide functional recovery and increased strength against further trauma or forces of scar contracture, and have the ability to prevent recurrence attributable to cartilage memory.

Keywords

Allograft Airway obstruction Crooked nose Deviated nose Extended spreader graft High-density porous polyethylene 

References

  1. 1.
    Barsky AJ, Sidney K, Simon E: Principles and practice of plastic surgery. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, 1964Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boccieri A, Pascali M: Septal crossbar graft for the correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:629, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breibart AS, Ablaza VJ: Implant materials. In: Aston SJ, Beasley RW, Thorne CHM (eds) Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery, 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, p. 39, 1997Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrd HS, Salomon J, Flood J: Correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2148, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrd HS: The crooked nose: An algorithm for repair. Presented at the 17th Annual Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium, pp 239–242, 2000Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Constantian MB: An algorithm for correcting the asymmetrical nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:801, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Converse JM: Corrective surgery of nasal deviations. Arch Otolaryngol 52:671, 1950Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Courtiss EH: Septorhinoplasty of the traumatically deformed nose. Ann Plast Surg 1:443, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foda H: The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:406, 2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fry H: Interlocked stresses in human nasal septal cartilage. Br J Plast Surg 19:276, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fry H: Nasal skeletal trauma and the interlocked stresses of the nasal septal cartilage. Br J. Plast Surg 20:146, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibson T, Davis WB: The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: Its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 10:257, 1958Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilbert SE: Overlay grafting for lateral nasal wall concavities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:385, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gubisch W: The extracorporal septum plasty: A technique to correct difficult nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:672, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ: Management of the deviated nose. Clin Plast Surg 15:43, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gurlek A, Celik M, Fariz A, Ersöz-Öztürk A, Eren AT, Tenekeci G. The use of high-density porous polyetylene as a custom-made nasal spreader graft. Aesth Plast Surg, 30:34, 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurlek A, Fariz A, Celik M, Ersöz-Öztürk A, Arslan A: Straightening the crooked middle third of the nose: Use of high-density porous polyethylene extended spreader grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 7:420, 2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H: A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2202, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karnes J, Salisbury M, Schaeferle M, Beckham P, Ersek RA: Porous high-density polyethylene implants (Medpor) for nasal dorsum augmentation. Aesth Surg 20:27, 2000Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKinney P, Shively R: Straightening the twisted nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:176, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mendelsohn M: Straightening the crooked middle third of the nose: Using porous polyethylene extended spreader grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:74–80, 2005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menderes A, Baytekin C, Topcu A, Yilmaz M, Barutcu A: Craniofacial reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene implants. J Craniofac Surg 15:719–724, 2004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Metzenbaum M: Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage versus submucous resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilages. Arch Otolaryngol 9:282, 1929Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Kilic MA: Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: An objective method of evaluation. Aesth Plast Surg 28:203, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pontius A, Leach JL: New techniques for management of the crooked nose. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:263, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porter JP, Toriumi DM: Surgical techniques for management of the crooked nose. Aesth Plast Surg (serial online) 26 (Suppl 1):18, 2002. Accessed November 21, 2002Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rohrich RJ: A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery (discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 2210, 1999Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rohrich RJ: Rhinoplasty: Dorsal reduction and spreader graft. Presented at the 17th Annual Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium, pp 153–166, 2000Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP: The deviated nose: Optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1509, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rohrich RJ, Minoli JJ, Adams WP, Hollier LH: The lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: An anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1309, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rohrich RJ, Sheen J: Secondary rhinoplasty. In: Grotting JC (ed.) Aesthetic rhinoplasty. Mosby: St. Louis, 1987Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salinger S: Deviation of the septum in relation to the twisted nose. Arch Otolaryngol 29:520, 1939Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seltzer AP: The nasal septum: Plastic repair of the deviated septum, associated with a deflected tip. Arch Otolaryngol 40:433, 1944Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheen JH: Spreader graft: A method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:230, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheen JH, Sheen AP: Aesthetic rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. Mosby: St. Louis, 1987Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheen JH, Sheen AP: Aesthetic rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. CV Mosby Co: St Louis 1998Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stal S, Hollier L: The use of resorbable spacers for nasal spreader grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:922, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tardy ME: Rinoplastica: Lo Stato dell’Arte. vol. II. EdiSES S.r.l: Naples, 1999Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Toriumi DM, Ries WR: Innovative surgical management of the crooked nose. Facial Plast Clin North Am 1:63, 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Gürlek
    • 1
  • Ayse Ersoz-Ozturk
    • 1
  • Mehmet Celik
    • 1
  • Cemal Fırat
    • 1
  • Serkan Aslan
    • 1
  • Hakan Aydogan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryT. Ozal Medical Center, İnönü University, Medical FacultyTurkey

Personalised recommendations