Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 212–221 | Cite as

Clinical Application of Biotechnically Cultured Autologous Chondrocytes as Novel Graft Material for Nasal Augmentation

  • Hiroko Yanaga
  • Mika Koga
  • Keisuke Imai
  • Katsu Yanaga


A new method of nasal augmentation has been developed, in which cultured autologous chondrocytes are transplanted. Using biotechnology, a piece of the choncha cartilage 1 cm2 is cultured into a gel-type mass of chondrocytes, which then is transplanted by injection into a surgically created subperiosteal skin pocket on the nasal dorsum. The augmented nose is taped and protected for 1 week. The grafted chondrocytes develop into mature cartilaginous tissue after approximately 1 month. This method was used in eight cases of nasal augmentation, and one case of chin augmentation (performed simultaneously), and one case of depressed deformity on the forehead. The results obtained by this method to date have been satisfactory after a follow-up time of 6 to 24 months. The authors believe that this method may at least partially be able to replace silicone implantation for nasal augmentation.


Autologous Biotechnology Cartilage Chondrocytes  Culture Rhinoplasty 


  1. 1.
    Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L: Treatment ofdeep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brittberg M, Tallheden T, Sjogren-Jansson B, Lindahl A, Peterson L: Autologous chondrocytes used for articular cartilage repair: an update. Clin Orthop 391:337–348, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao YL, Vacanti JP, Paige KT, Upton J, Vacanti CA: Transplantation ofchondrocytes utilizing a polymercell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape ofa human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:297– 302, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardenas-Camarena L, Guerrero MT: Use ofcartilaginous autografts in nasal surgery: 8 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1003–1013, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gurley JM, Pilgram T, Perlyn CA, Marsh JL: Longterm outcome ofautogenous rib graft nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1895–1905, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hodgkinson DJ: The olecranon bone graft for nasal augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:129–132, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson IT, Choi HY, Clay R, Bevilacqua R, TerKonda S, Celik M, Smith AW: Long-term follow-up of cranial bone graft in dorsal nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1869–1873, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kinney BM, Hughess CE III: Soft tissue filler: an overview. Aesthetic Surg 21:469–471, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maas CS, Monhian N, Shah SB: Implants in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 13:279–290, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mak K, Toriumi DM: Injectable filler materials for soft tissue augmentation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:211–222, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matarasso A, Elias AC, Elias RL: Labial incompetence: a marker for progressive bone resorption in silastic chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 1007–1014, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCurdy JA Jr: The Asian nose: augmentation rhinoplasty with L-shaped silicone implants. Facial Plast Surg 18:245–252, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mottura AA: Chin augmentation with nasal osteocartilaginous graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:783–787, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez A, Cao YL, Ibarra C, Pap S, Vacanti M, Eavey RD, Vacanti CA: Characteristics ofcartilage engineered from human pediatric auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1111–1119, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ting V, Sims CD, Brecht LE, McCarthy JG, Kasabian AK, Connelly PR, Elisseeff J, Gittes GK, Longaker MT: In vitro prefabrication of human cartilage shapes using fibrin glue and human chondrocytes. Ann Plast Surg 40:413–421, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vacanti CA, Langer R, Schloo B: Synthetic biodegradable polymers seeded with chondrocytes provide a template for new cartilage formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:753–759, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Osch GJ, van der Veen SW, Verwoerd-VerhoefHL: In vitro redifferentiation ofculture-expanded rabbit and human auricular chondrocytes for cartilage reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:433–440, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wheeler ES, Kawamoto HK, Zarem HA: Bone grafts for nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:9–18, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeng Y, Wu W, Yu H, Yang J, Chen G: Slicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:85–88, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroko Yanaga
    • 1
  • Mika Koga
    • 1
  • Keisuke Imai
    • 2
  • Katsu Yanaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Yanaga Clinic and Tissue Culture LaboratoryKitakyushuJapan
  2. 2.Division of Plastic SurgeryOsaka City General HospitalMiyakojima-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations