Adverse Reactions to Injectable Soft Tissue Permanent Fillers
- 1.7k Downloads
Synthetic injectable facial fillers with a permanent effect are widely atoxic and nonimmunogenic, but they differ with respect to composition and in chemical and biologic characteristics. Yet, they all act as foreign bodies in the tissues eliciting a host response that try to remove the gel. Inflammatory nodules may develop at the sites of injection-for some fillers, many years later, for others, not. Why is that?
Biopsies were contributed by various plastic surgeons from Europe and Australia after requests were made at international congresses and workshops. The study was based on (a) 5 biopsies from unreactive tissue obtained at different times after injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid); (b) 28 biopsies from intermediate or late inflammatory nodules after injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid) (20 cases), a hyaluronic acid-polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate/ethylmethacrylate gel (Dermalive) (2 cases), and a gel consisting of polylactic acid in mannitol/carbomethoxycellulose (New-Fill) (6 cases); and (c) a review of the literature on adverse reactions after injection with permanent fillers.
Clinically unreactive tissues after injection with Aquamid showed modest or no host reaction. Inflammatory nodules showed an increased foreign body reaction and a bacterial infection after injection with Aquamid, and a combination of moderate foreign body reaction, fibrosis, and in some cases also bacterial infection after injection with Dermalive and New-Fill. According to the literature, inflammatory nodules occur no later than 1 year after injection with polyacrylamide hydrogel, but up to 6 years after injection of combination gels (Artecol), and up to 28 years after injection of silicone gel.
Inflammatory nodules are likely to be caused by a low-grade infection maintained within a biogfilm surrounding the hydrophobic silicone gel and the combination gels. Aquamid gel may prevent formation of a biofilm through its high water-binding capacity, explaining why late inflammatory nodules are not seen after injection of this polyacrylamide hydrogel product.
KeywordsAdverse reactions Facial augmentation Literature review Permanent effect Synthetic injectable fillers
- 5.Bakker-Woudenberg, IAJM, Lokerse, AF, Ten Kate, MT, et al. 1993.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis126167Google Scholar
- 12.Christensen, L, Breiting, V, Vuust, J, Hogdall, E, Christensen, L, Breiting, V, Vuust, J, Hogdall, E .Adverse reactions following infection with a permanent facial filler, polyacryl amide hydrogel (Aquamid): Causes and treatmentEur J Plast Surg..in pressGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cronin, TD, Gerow, FJ 1964Augmentation mammoplasty: A natural feelExcerpta MedicaPrinceton, NJ4149Google Scholar
- 24.Ersek, RA, Beisang, AA 1991Bioplastique: A new textured copolymer microparticle promoses permanence in soft tissue augmentationPlast Reconstr Surg33693702Google Scholar
- 25.Ficarra, G, Mosqueda-Taylor, A, Carlos, R 2002Silicone granuloma of the facial tissues: A report of seven casesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol946573Google Scholar
- 26.Gabriel, SS, O’Fallon, M, Kurland, LT, Beard, CM, Woods, JE, Melton, LJ III 1994Risk of connective tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantationN Engl Med33016971702Google Scholar
- 27.Gregoriadis, G 1992Liposomes as immunological adjuvants: Approaches to immunopotentiation including ligand-mediated targeting to macrophagesRes Immunol43178185Google Scholar
- 30.Hill, SL, Landavere, MG, Rose, NR 1996The adjuvant effect of silicone gel and silicone elastomer particles in ratsCurr Top. MicrobiolImmuno123137Google Scholar
- 32.Jensen, JS, Trap, B, Skydsgaard, K 1991Delayed contact hypersensitivity and surgical glove penetration with acrylic bone cementsArch Orthop Scand622428Google Scholar
- 34.Kao, WJ, Lee, D 1984In vivo modulation of host response and macrophage behaviour by polymer networks grafted with the fibronectin-derived biomimetic oligopeptides: The role of RGD and PHSRN domainsBiomaterials2229012909Google Scholar
- 37.Lemperle, G, Gauthier-Hazan, N, Lemperle, M 1998PMMA microspheres (Artecoll) for long-lasting correction of wrinkles: Part III. Refinements and statisticsAesth Plast Surg22356365Google Scholar
- 39.Lemperle, G, Morhenn, V, Charrier, U 2003Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentationAesth Plast Surg27354366Google Scholar
- 40.Lemperle, G, Ott, H, Charrier, U, Hecker, J, Lemperle, M 1991PMMA microspheres for intradermal implantation: Part IAnimal research. Ann Plast Surg265763Google Scholar
- 42.Leong, AS, Disney, AP, Gove, DW 1981Retractile particles in liver of hemodialysis patientsLancet1889890Google Scholar
- 50.Milojevic, B 1982Complications after silicone injection therapy in aesthetic plastic surgeryAesth Plast Surg6203206Google Scholar
- 52.Montheard, JP, Chatzopoulos, M, Chappard, D 19922-Hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate (HEMA): Chemical properties and applications in biomedical fieldsRev Macromol Chem PhysC321Google Scholar
- 59.Raszewski, R, Guyuron, B, Lash, RH, McMahon, JT, Tuthill, RJ 1999A severe fibrotic reaction after cosmetic liquid silicone injectionJ Cranio-Max Surg18225228Google Scholar
- 66.Serdev N, Topalov I (1996) Use of PAA-Gel in some congenital anomalies of the chest. In: Proceedings of the 30th World Congress of the International College of Surgeons, Kyoto, Japan, November 25-29, 1996Google Scholar
- 72.Thornton, JW, Argenta, LC, McClatchey, KD, Marks, MW 1988Studies on the endogenous flora of the human breastAn. Plast Surg203942Google Scholar
- 78.Virden, CP, Dobke, MK, Stein, P 1992Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contractureAesth Plast Surg16173179Google Scholar
- 79.Von Bulow S, Pallua N, von Heimburg D (2004) Efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel for facial soft tissue augmentation: A prospective multi centre study for evaluation of safety and aesthetic results in 228 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg, in pressGoogle Scholar
- 80.Wall, IB, Davies, CE, Hill, KE, Wilson, MJ, Stephens, P, Harding, KG, Thomas, DW 2002Potential role of anaerobic cocci in impaired human wound healingWound Rep Reg10346353Google Scholar
- 82.Webster, RC, Fuleihan, NS, Hamdan, US, et al. 1986: Injectable silicone: Report of 17,000 facial treatments since 1962Am J Cosmetic Surg34148Google Scholar
- 88.Zeller, JM 1983Surgical implants: Physiological responseAORNJ3712841291Google Scholar