Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 288–294 | Cite as

A Technique to Decrease Breast Shape Deformity During Muscle Contraction in Submuscular Augmentation Mammaplasty

  • Mario Pelle-CeravoloEmail author
  • Aldo Del Vescovo
  • Ettore Bertozzi
  • Paola Molinari
Article

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to decrease breast shape distortion during pectoralis muscle contraction following submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. We followed 348 patients who had retromuscular augmentation mammoplasty: 251 (72.1%) had polyurethane-covered gel-filled, 97 (27.9%) had textured-silicone gel-filled implants. Among the 348, 46 had surgery following the Regnault technique and 302 had surgery by the below-mentioned technique. Periareolar incision, bipartision of breast parenchima down to the fascia, undermining of breast base from the fascia downward to the inframammary sulcus or a little below it, detaching of muscle off the thoracic cage, disinsertion of abdomino-costal pectoralis attachments. Full thickness incision of pectoralis muscle on a vertical line on the nipple projection for 2–5 inches. Placing of prothesis. Drainage. Closure. No objective evaluation was used, only clinical judgments by three observers—the surgeon, a nurse and the patient herself. The results showed a definite decrease of the dynamic deformity among patients in whom the author’s technical variation was carried out. This technique allows also, for decreasing the upward pushing of the implant during pectoralis muscle contraction and facilitates stretch of the breast tissue in patients with tighter breast envelopes. Despite lack of precise measurements, conclusions drawn from clinical judgments, taken as objectively as possible, suggest that the use of this technique may offer the solution of an otherwise disturbing collateral effect, frequently seen after this operation.

Keywords

Mastoplasty Retromuscular Implants Muscle contraction Breast shape Dynamic deformation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Puckett, CL, Croll, GH, Reichel, CA, Concannon, MJ 1987A critical look at capsular contracture in subglandular versus subpectoral mammary augmentation.Aesth Plast Surg1123Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vazquez, B, Given, KS, Houston, GC 1987Brest augmentation: A review of subglandular and submuscular implantation.Aesth Plast Surg11101Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biggs, TM, Yarish, RS 1990A comparative analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg85368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dempsey, WC, Latham, WD 1968Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty.Plast Reconstr Surg42515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffiths Jr, CO 1969The submuscular implants in augmentation mammaplasty P.1009.Sanvenero-Rosselli, G eds. Transaction of 4th International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rome, October 1967. Excepta Medica Int. Congr. Series n°174)Excepta MedicaAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, RP, Friedman, GD 1981Periareolar subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty.Plast Reconstr Surg67453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tebbetts, JB 1988Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: A nine-year experience.Clin Plast Surg15557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramirez, OM, Heller, MDL, Tebbetts, JB 2002Dual plane breast augmentation: Avoiding pectoralis major displacement.Plast Reconstr Surg15110Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sohn, BK, Chung, YJ, Kim, G, Yoon, WY 2000Submuscular periareolar approach to augmentation mammoplasty in Korean women.Aesthetic Plast Surg246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hidalgo, DA 2000Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane.Plast Reconstr Surg1056Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asplund, O, Gylbert, L, Jurell, G, Ward, C 1996Textured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: A controlled study.Plast Reconstr Surg976Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gray, H 1935Anatomy: Descriptive and Applied, 26th Ed.LongmansLondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caldeira, AML, Lucas, A 2000Pectoralis major muscle flap: A new support approach to mammaplasty, personal technique.Aesth Plast Surg245870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ralph, TM 1980An anatomical study of the pectoralis major muscle as related to functioning free muscle transplantation.Plast Reconstr Surg65610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffman, GW, Elliott, LF 1987The anatomy of the pectoral nerves and its significance to the general and plastic surgeon.Ann Surg5205Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maxwell, GP, Perry, L 1995The capsule in various types of breast implants.Plast Reconstr Surg595Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Regnault, P 1977Partial submuscolar breast augmentation.Plast Reconstr Surg5972PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Pelle-Ceravolo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aldo Del Vescovo
    • 1
  • Ettore Bertozzi
    • 1
  • Paola Molinari
    • 1
  1. 1.Nostra Signora della Mercede Hospital, RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations