Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 368–375 | Cite as

Porcine Dermal Collagen (Permacol) for Facial Contour Augmentation: Preliminary Report

Article

Abstract

Soft tissue loss or damage can occur for various reasons, including trauma, surgery, and disease. Reconstruction of normal contours can be achieved by using either alloplastic implants or autogenous tissues. Permacol, a dermal replacement material derived from fibrous acellular porcine dermal collagen, has been used for restoration of soft-tissue contours in the face. Eight patients were treated with porcine collagen in an attempt to achieve a smooth contour and a natural feel. Clinically visible soft tissue defects were successfully covered and aesthetic results were satisfying. Transient swelling that subsided within a week was noted in all patients. Meticulous and aseptic technique is mandatory for Permacol use. With this limited experience, Permacol was successfully used as a filler implant in reconstruction of post-traumatic soft-tissue defects, correcting post-parotidectomy hallowing and secondary nasal surgery to cover osseocartilaginous irregularities. However, there is a potential risk of inflammation and skin contractures in thin-skinned patients when implants are placed superficially.

Keywords

Permacol Porcine collagen Soft-tissue reconstruction Facial deformity 

References

  1. 1.
    Achauer, BM, VanderKam, VM, Celiköz, B, Jacobson, DG 1998Augmentation of facial soft-tissue defects with Alloderm dermal graft.Ann Plast Surg41503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adedeji, OA, Bailey, CA, Varma, JS 2002Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal-wall reconstruction.Br J Plast Surg5585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alster, TS, West, TB 2000Human-derived and new synthetic injectable materials for soft-tissue augmentation: Current status and role in cosmetic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg1052515Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrington, JW, Edwards, G .Minimal access sling using PelvicolTM.Int J Urogynaecol J11V8 S122Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belcher, HJCR, Zic, R 2001Adverse effect of porcine collagen interposition after trapezoidectomy. A comparative study.J Hand Surg (Br)26B159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Billings Jr, E, May Jr, JW 1989Historical review and present status of free fat graft autotransplantation in plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg83368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castor, SA, To, WC, Papay, FA 1999Lip augmentation with Alloderm acellular dermal graft and fat autograft: A comparison with autologous fat injection.Aesth Plast Surg23218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiu, DTW, Edgerton, BW 1990Repair and grafting of dermis, fat, and fascia.McCarthy, JG eds. Plastic Surgery.WB SaundersPhiladelphia508526Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coleman, WP, Lawrence, N, Sherman, RN, Reed, RJ, Pinski, KS 1993Autologous collagen. Lipocytic dermal augmentation: A histopathologic study.J Dermatol Surg Oncol191032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erol, OO 2000Facial autologous soft-tissue contouring by adjunction of tissue cocktail injection (Micrograft and minigraft mixture of dermis, fascia, and fat).Plast Reconstr Surg1061375Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths, RW, Shakespeare, PG 1982Human dermal collagen allografts: A three year histopathological study.Br J Plast Surg35519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harper, C 2001Permacol™: clinical experience with a new biomaterial.Hosp Med6290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holl-Allen, RTJ 1984Porcine dermal collagen implants in man.J R Coll Surg Edinb29151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson, IT, Yavuzer, R 2000Hydroxyapatite cement: An alternative for craniofacial skeletal contour refinements.Br J Plast Surg5324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kononas, TC, Bucky, LP, Hurley, C, May Jr, JW 1993The fate of suctioned and surgically removed fat after implantation for soft-tissue augmentation: A volumetric and histologic study in the rabbit.Plast Reconstr Surg91763Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Little, JW 2002Applications of the classic dermal fat graft in primary and secondary facial rejuvenation.Plast Reconstr Surg109788Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nacul, AM, Nacul, AP, de Born, AG 1998Bioplastique as a complement in conventional plastic surgery.Aesth Plast Surg22444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicolle, FV, Matti, BA, Scamp, T 1992Dermal and fascial autografts in facial aesthetic surgery.Aesth Plast Surg16219Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruparelia, BA, GunasheelaSundar, K 2000Anterior and posterior vaginal collapse repairs with porcine skin collagen (Permacol™) implant.Int Urogynaecol J11FDP33 S45Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sevin, K, Askar, I, Saray, A, Yormuk, E 2000Exposure of high-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) used for contour restoration and treatment.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg3844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sclafani, AP, Romo III, T 2000Biology and chemistry of facial implants.Facial Plast Surg163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sclafani, AP, Romo III, T, Parker, A, McCormick, SA, Cocker, R, Jacono, A 2002Homologous collagen dispersion (Dermalogen) as a dermal filler: Persistence and histology compared with bovine collagen.Ann Plast Surg49181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ward, BB, Feinberg, SE, Friedman, CD 2002Tissue matrices for soft tissue and mucosal augmentation and replacement.Facial Plast Surg183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kirikkale University Medical School, KirikkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations