Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 451–456 | Cite as

The Use of the Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Pedicle and Vertical Versus Horizontal Flap Inset Models in TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction: The Aesthetic Outcome

  • Aret Çerçi Özkan
  • Orhan Çizmeci
  • Hülya Aydın
  • Burcu Çelet Özden
  • Burçak Tümerdem
  • Ufuk Emekli
  • Oktar Asoğlu
  • Yavuz Bozfakioğlu
Article

Abstract

The use of an ipsilateral or a contralateral rectus abdominis muscle as a pedicle and comparison of their advantages and disadvantages in TRAM flap breast reconstruction have been reported in the literature. In our clinical experience with 22 pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions, the use of either an ipsilateral or contralateral pedicle was found to be equivocal regarding the flap viability and the aesthetic outcome. Thus, it seems better to decide their use according to the needs of an individual patient.

In our series, the contralateral pedicled TRAM flap with a vertical flap inset was preferred in patients with a small opposite breast or in patients with infraclavicular tissue losses (four patients). The ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction with a horizontal flap inset was preferred in patients with a full and attractive opposite breast, unless they received adjuvant radiotherapy (six patients). In patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy the contralateral pedicle was used regardless of the inset model preferred (10 patients). Bilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction was applied in one of our cases, which is not included in the three categories above mentioned. The aesthetic outcome was determined by analyzing a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Overall satisfaction was achieved in 17 patients. Four patients were dissatisfied.

We think that choosing the correct flap inset model is one of the most important factors in achieving a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Choosing the correct pedicle regarding the type of the flap inset model is equally important to facilitate technical ease during flap transposition and to improve flap survival.

Key words

TRAM flap Ipsilateral pedicle Contralateral pedicle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrade AN, Baxter N, Semple JL: Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bostwick J: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Quality Medical Publishing: St. Louis, MO, p. 760–784, 1990Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clugston PA, Lennox PA, Thompson RP: Intraoperative vascular monitoring of ipsilateral vs. contralateral TRAM flaps. Ann Plast Surg 41:6, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clugston PA, Gingrass MK, Azurin D, Fisher J: Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM Raps: the safer alternative? Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans GR, David CL, Loyer EM, Storm E, Waldron C, Ortega R, Ainslie N, Wang B, Janjan N: The long-term effects of internal mammary chain irradiation and its role in the vascular supply of the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 35:4, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanks SH, Lyons JA, Crowe J, Lucas A, Yetman RJ: The acute effects of postoperative radiation therapy on the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap used in immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:5, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartrampf CR Jr., Anton MA, Bried JT: Breast reconstruction with the transverse abdominal island (TRAM) flap. In: Georgiade SG, Riefkohl R, Levin LS (eds.) Plastic, maxillofacial and reconstructive surgery, 3rd ed. William & Wilkins: Baltimore, 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunt KK, Baldwin BJ, Stoom EA, Ames FC, McNeese MD, Kroll SS, Singletary SE: Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 4:5, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Missana MC, Levy C, Barreau-Pouhaer L: Radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flap in breast cancer of reserved prognosis. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 45:2, 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olding M, Emory RE: Preferential use of the ipsilateral pedicle in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 40:4, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS, Baldwin BJ, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Robb GL: Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:2, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams JK, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Mackay G, Landry J, Benton J, Joseph B: TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiation treatment. Ann Surg 221:6, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Mackay G: The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:5, 1997Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aret Çerçi Özkan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Orhan Çizmeci
    • 1
  • Hülya Aydın
    • 1
  • Burcu Çelet Özden
    • 1
  • Burçak Tümerdem
    • 1
  • Ufuk Emekli
    • 1
  • Oktar Asoğlu
    • 2
  • Yavuz Bozfakioğlu
    • 2
  1. 1.Istanbul UniversityCapaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityCapaTurkey
  3. 3.Incirli-Osmaniye YoluIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations