Self-assessment strategy during contest decisions between male Great Himalayan leaf-nosed bats
Agonistic interactions in animals are often settled based on the rules of an assessment strategy. We tested the predictions of evolutionary game theory models (including two models based on self-assessment: (a) the energetic war of attrition model, (b) the cumulative assessment model, and a third model (c) based on mutual assessment model) during contests between males of the Great Himalayan leaf-nosed bat Hipposideros armiger. We also studied the potential proxies of resource holding potential (RHP: body mass and forearm length) and their relationship to contest duration and the level of escalation. Overall, heavier males won more contests than lighter males, and they had an advantage in physical fights. In physical contests, the contest duration was positively correlated with the body mass of the loser but not the body mass of the winner. These results supported the prediction that males make decisions based on their own RHP (self-assessment: the energetic war of attrition model) rather than on RHP of their opponent (mutual assessment). Contest duration was not related to the forearm length of the winner or the loser. No relationship between body size (i.e., body mass and forearm length) and contest duration was observed for non-physical contests. This did not support any of the predictions applying to the energetic war of attrition model, the cumulative assessment model, and the mutual assessment model, indicating that no assessment occurred during non-physical contests. This study provides the first empirical evidence that bats make decisions based on their own RHP during agonistic interactions.
This study provides empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that during physical contests bats make decisions based on estimates of their own ability (self-assessment) rather than on a process of mutual assessment. This finding will facilitate comparative studies of fighting strategy across bat species.
KeywordsAgonistic behavior Agonistic interaction Hipposideros armiger Mutual assessment Self-assessment
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31872680 and 31670390).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Bats were captured by mist nets. Then, they were placed individually in cloth bags and transported to housing in temporary field experimental stations near the bat roosts. No bat suffered any obvious effects from the process of capture, transport, and experiment. No visible physical injuries were observed, although some contests involved physical contact. We removed the aluminum alloy bands before the bats were release. All of the captured bats were released in good health at their original site of capture after the completion of the experiment. Experimental procedures were in compliance with the National Natural Science Foundation of China for experiments involving vertebrate animals and were approved by Northeast Animal Research Authority in Northeast Normal University, China (approval number: NENU-W-2017-101).
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
- Archer J (1998) The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Bakker TCM, Feuth-de Bruijn E, Sevenster P (1989) Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 82:224–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barki A, Harpaz S, Karplus I (1997) Contradictory asymmetries in body size and weapon size, and assessment in fighting male prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aggressive Behav 23:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1997)23:2<81::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates P, Bumrungsri S, Francis C, Csorba G (2008) Hipposideros armiger. IUCN red list of threatened species, version 2017.3, http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Conflict resolution. In: Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (eds) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 421–465Google Scholar
- Briffa M (2015) Animal signaling: integrating analysis of functions and mechanisms. In: Irschick DJ, Briffa M, Podos J (eds) Animal signaling and function: an integrative approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp 141–173Google Scholar
- Clement MJ, Dietz N, Gupta P, Kanwal JS (2006) Audiovocal communication and social behavior in mustached bats. In: Kanwal JS, Ehret G (eds) Behavior and neurodynamics for auditory communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–84Google Scholar
- Draud M, Lynch PAE (2002) Asymmetric contests for breeding sites between monogamous pairs of convict cichlids (Archocentrus nigrofasciatum, Cichlidae) pair experience pays. Behaviour 139:861–873Google Scholar
- Kunz TH, Weise CD (2009) Methods and devices for marking bats. In: Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp 36–56Google Scholar
- McWilliam AN (1988) Social organisation of the bat Tadarida (Chaerephon) pumila, (Chiroptera: Molossidae) in Ghana, West Africa. Ethology 77:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00197.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Porter FL (1979) Social behavior in the leaf-nosed bat, Carollia perspicillata. I. Social organization. Z Tierpsychol 49:406–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00301.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams CF (1986) Social organization of the bat, Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Ethology 71:265–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00591.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang (2011) Mating system and kinship of the Formasan leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros armiger erasensis (Chiroptera, Hippsideridae). Dissertation, National Chung Hsing UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X, Jiang T, Gu H, Liu H, Sun C, Liu Y, Feng J (2018) Are aggressive vocalizations the honest signals of body size and quality in female Asian particoloured bats? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72(96). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2510-x
- Zucker N, Murray L (1996) Determinants of dominance in the tree lizard Urosaurus ornatus: the relative importance of mass, previous experience and coloration. Ethology 102:812–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01203.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar