Using phylogenetic comparative methods to gain insight into the evolution of social complexity
- 278 Downloads
Social complexity can have important evolutionary implications, and phylogenetic comparative methods have long been used as a way to assess interspecific support for hypotheses on the subject. Statistical approaches for conducting such analyses have come a long way in the last few decades, and it is now possible to use comparative data to ask sophisticated questions about the evolution of complex phenotypes while taking also uncertainty in the phylogeny into account. Here, we illustrate these advances by applying a phylogenetic analysis of covariance to two data sets addressing the evolution of social complexity in primates. First, we find that social complexity (as inferred by group size) is predicted by whether a species is diurnal and terrestrial. Second, we find that social complexity (as inferred by social organization) has increased over evolutionary time and can impact trait evolution. Particularly, we find that baculum length has been growing with body size in dispersed, pair-living and, more weakly, multi-male species, becoming relatively smaller and more variable in aggregations that are more socially stable.
Sociality poses a particular challenge for interspecific analyses because of the many ways that its intrinsic complexity can be coded into statistical variables and models. However, with methods that incorporate phylogenies and nuanced inferences about underlying evolutionary processes, even coarse measures of social complexity can offer valuable insights in the study of behavioral trends through time. Exploring two interspecific data sets on primates, we show how simple measures of sociality, either coded as continuous or categorical variables, can be used to revisit latent evolutionary hypotheses while revealing new pieces of information that become available thanks to the added complexity of novel phylogenetic comparative methods. One example reveals that larger and more variable groups are associated with shifts in habitat and activity patterns, while the other reveals that baculum evolution might be influenced by the increasing social stability of primate aggregations.
KeywordsAnalysis of covariance Evolution Group size Social organization Phylogenetic comparative method Primates
The authors wish to thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for detailed and helpful comments provided on earlier versions of this manuscript.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number IOS-1257562 to EPM. It was also supported by fellowships from COLCIENCIAS (Becas Caldas 497-2009) and the Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior (CISAB) at Indiana University to JAF-G.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Dixson AF (2013) Primate sexuality: comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Dixson A, Nyholt J, Anderson M (2004) A positive relationship between baculum length and prolonged intromission patterns in mammals. Dong Wu Xue Bao 50:490–503Google Scholar
- Fuentes-González JA (2018) Phylogenies and the comparative method in morphometrics: a behavioral glimpse on morphological evolution. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
- Kamagi DDW, Corebima AD, Rengkuan M (2014) Phylogenetic position of North Sulawesi Tarsius sp. based on partial cytochrome b gene sequences. Open J Genet 4:10Google Scholar
- Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2011) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. version 2.74. http://mesquiteproject.org. Accessed 24 March 2017
- Martins EP, Fuentes-González JA (2018) Comparative methods and phylogenetic tests of adaptation. In: Pfennig K (ed) Oxford bibliographies in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–19Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing. Vienna, p 125Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2016) rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC. Version 4–6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags. Accessed 4 April 2017
- Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6:7–11Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.3.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 1 February 2018
- Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Snow G (2016) Teaching demos: demonstrations for teaching and learning, version 2.10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TeachingDemos. Accessed 1 February 2018