Synthesis of Tinbergen’s four questions and the future of sociogenomics
- 985 Downloads
It has been 55 years since Nikolaas Tinbergen formalized the field of ethology by identifying four types of inquiry that address the “how” and “why” of animal behavior from both a contemporary and historical perspective. This framework has been particularly useful in exploring eusocial behavior among insects, due to integration across levels of analysis and timescales of influence. Although the former has proceeded quite deliberately, the latter has received less attention. Here, I synthesize recent findings regarding the mechanisms, ontogeny, evolution, and function of eusociality in ants, bees, and wasps. This synthesis reveals that there has been rapid gain of knowledge regarding the genetic underpinnings of eusocial behavior, but an understanding of the fitness consequences of these molecular mechanisms lags behind. Similarly, it has become clear that maternal or sibling effects on development are major drivers of caste-related behavior, but the mechanisms that produce these effects are largely unknown. Developmental caste determination and caste-biasing require sensitivities to social cues, but how this plasticity evolved from solitary ancestors is unknown. Understanding the origins of developmental plasticity is necessary to understand how plasticity shapes the evolutionary trajectory of social traits. Likewise, the influence of social function on molecular evolution has been studied within a robust theoretical framework; however, these studies will benefit from an understanding of how ancestral conditions promote the acquisition of social function in the first place. Future studies that span both levels of analysis and timescales of influence will further advance the integrative field of ethology that Tinbergen envisioned.
KeywordsEusociality Kin selection Proximate Ultimate Developmental plasticity Social complexity
I am grateful to P. Kappeler, S. Schultz, D. Lukas, and T. Clutton-Brock for organizing this topical issue. This manuscript was improved by helpful discussion with lab members and by suggestions from P. Kappeler, D. Lukas, and two anonymous reviewers.
This study received financial support from Utah State University and the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (project 1297).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Batra SWT (1966) Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Indian J Entomol 28:375–393Google Scholar
- Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1986) The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps. Annu Rev Entomol 31:431–454. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hahn DA, Denlinger DL (2011) Energetics of insect diapause. Annu Rev Entomol 56:103–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harpur BA, Kent CF, Molodtsova D, Lebon JM, Alqarni AS, Owayss AA, Zayed A (2014) Population genomics of the honey bee reveals strong signatures of positive selection on worker traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:2614–2619. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315506111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hunt JH, Kensinger BJ, Kossuth JA, Henshaw MT, Norberg K, Wolschin F, Amdam GV (2007) A diapause pathway underlies the gyne phenotype in Polistes wasps, revealing an evolutionary route to caste-containing insect societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:14020–14025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705660104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kapheim KM, Bernal SP, Smith AR, Nonacs P, Wcislo WT (2011) Support for maternal manipulation of developmental nutrition in a facultatively eusocial bee, Megalopta genalis (Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1131-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kapheim KM, Pan H, Li C, Salzberg SL, Puiu D, Magoc T, Robertson HM, Hudson ME, Venkat A, Fischman BJ, Hernandez A, Yandell M, Ence D, Holt C, Yocum GD, Kemp WP, Bosch J, Waterhouse RM, Zdobnov EM, Stolle E, Kraus FB, Helbing S, Moritz RFA, Glastad KM, Hunt BG, Goodisman MAD, Hauser F, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP, Pinheiro DG, Nunes FMF, Soares MPM, Tanaka ED, Simoes ZLP, Hartfelder K, Evans JD, Barribeau SM, Johnson RM, Massey JH, Southey BR, Hasselmann M, Hamacher D, Biewer M, Kent CF, Zayed A, Blatti C, Sinha S, Johnston JS, Hanrahan SJ, Kocher SD, Wang J, Robinson GE, Zhang G (2015b) Social evolution. Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living. Science 348:1139–1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4788 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kijimoto T, Snell-Rood EC, Pespeni MH, Rocha G, Kafadar K, Moczek AP (2014) The nutritionally responsive transcriptome of the polyphenic beetle Onthophagus taurus and the importance of sexual dimorphism and body region. Proc R Soc B 281:20142084. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1984) Multifemale nests and rudimentary castes in the normally solitary bee Ceratina-japonica (Hymenoptera, Xylocopinae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 57:639–656Google Scholar
- Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1989) Compatibility and incompatibility of solitary life with eusociality in two normally solitary bees Ceratina japonica and Ceratina okinawana (Hymenoptera, Apoidea), with notes on the incipient phase of eusociality. Jpn J Entomol 57:417–739Google Scholar
- Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1995) Task allocation in artificially induced colonies of a basically solitary bee Ceratina (Ceratinidia) okinawana, with a comparison of sociality between Ceratina and Xylocopa (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae, Xylocopinae). Jpn J Ecol 63:115–150Google Scholar
- Simola DF, Wissler L, Donahue G, Waterhouse RM, Helmkampf M, Roux J, Nygaard S, Glastad KM, Hagen DE, Viljakainen L, Reese JT, Hunt BG, Graur D, Elhaik E, Kriventseva EV, Wen J, Parker BJ, Cash E, Privman E, Childers CP, Munoz-Torres MC, Boomsma JJ, Bornberg-Bauer E, Currie CR, Elsik CG, Suen G, Goodisman MAD, Keller L, Liebig J, Rawls A, Reinberg D, Smith CD, Smith CR, Tsutsui N, Wurm Y, Zdobnov EM, Berger SL, Gadau J (2013) Social insect genomes exhibit dramatic evolution in gene composition and regulation while preserving regulatory features linked to sociality. Genome Res 23:1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.155408.113 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Toth AL, Rehan SM (2017) Molecular evolution of insect sociality: an eco-evo-devo perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 62:419–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035601 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toth AL, Varala K, Newman TC, Miguez FE, Hutchison SK, Willoughby DA, Simons JF, Egholm M, Hunt JH, Hudson ME, Robinson GE (2007) Wasp gene expression supports an evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science 318:441–444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146647 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh JT, Warner MR, Kase A, Cushing BJ, Linksvayer TA (2017) Ant nurse workers exhibit behavioral and transcriptomic specialization on larval stage but not caste. bioRxiv:218834. https://doi.org/10.1101/218834
- Weitekamp CA, Libbrecht R, Keller L (2017) Genetics and evolution of social behavior in insects. Annu Rev Genet 51:219–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024515 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- West Eberhard MJ (1987) Flexible strategy and social evolution. In: Ito Y, Brown JL, Kikkawa J (eds) Animal societies: theories and facts. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 35–51Google Scholar
- West Eberhard MJ (1996) Wasp societies as microcosms for the study of development and evolution. In: Turillazzi S, West Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 290–317Google Scholar
- West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Yan H, Opachaloemphan C, Mancini G, Yang H, Gallitto M, Mlejnek J, Leibholz A, Haight K, Ghaninia M, Huo L, Perry M, Slone J, Zhou X, Traficante M, Penick CA, Dolezal K, Gokhale K, Stevens K, Fetter-Pruneda I, Bonasio R, Zwiebel LJ, Berger SL, Liebig J, Reinberg D, Desplan C (2017) An engineered orco mutation produces aberrant social behavior and defective neural development in ants. Cell 170:736–747. e739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.051 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar