Size-dependent variability in the formation and trade-offs of facultative aggregations in golden orb-web spiders (Nephila clavipes)
The vast majority (> 99.99%) of spiders are solitary, but in some species, individuals form stable groups or, alternatively, looser aggregations that fluctuate over space and time. While previous work has documented trade-offs associated with being part of intraspecific groups, rather than being solitary, we know less about why grouping behavior would be facultative. Residing in a group can reduce predation risk, but also lead to competition for food, and we hypothesized that variation in these trade-offs could provide insights into the optional nature of clustering. We used a Costa Rican population of golden orb-web spiders, Nephila clavipes, to ask two questions. First, we tested whether a spider’s size influenced the trade-offs of clustering, and second, whether inter-annual variation in predator and prey abundance could help explain clustering patterns. We also examined the process of cluster formation and dissolution in relation to spider size. Data collected on over 1500 spiders over 4 years indicated that in each year, small spiders experienced the greatest reduction in predation if clustered and also were most likely to initiate aggregations. Overall rates of predation varied significantly among years, and small spiders were most likely to cluster in the year with highest predation. We also detected a cost of clustering in the form of reduced prey capture, but only in years with relatively high overall prey acquisition. Together, these findings suggest that trade-offs that vary individually and over time could influence a spider’s decision to cluster and, hence, explain the facultative nature of aggregating in this population.
Animals within a population can show variability in a range of behaviors, such as foraging and predator avoidance, and at times, the ideal way of behaving depends on individual or environmental conditions. In this study, we asked why some female golden orb-web spiders (Nephila clavipes) form groups, while in the same population, others are solitary. This is an interesting question given how rare aggregations are among spiders. In our study, small spiders benefited most from clustering in terms of higher survival when aggregated compared to when solitary. At the same time, spiders of all sizes captured less prey when aggregated, although this cost was only detected in years with relatively abundant prey. Together, these findings suggest that trade-offs that vary individually and over time could influence a spider’s decision to cluster and, hence, explain the optional nature of aggregating in this population.
KeywordsAnimal groups Predation Spiders Environmental variation Ontogeny, body size
We appreciate the suggestions of our anonymous reviewers. We acknowledge L. Sauvage for assistance in the field and D. McFarlane, J.C. Araya, G. Arias, G. Montoya, M. Fernández, and W. Roberts for logistical support. We thank Pitzer College for access to the Firestone Center for Restoration Ecology.
This work was supported by the Eaton Ecological Research Fellowship; the W.M. Keck Fund; the Norris Foundation; the Rose Hill Foundation; and Pitzer College.
- Avilés L, Guevara J (2017) Sociality in spiders. In: Rubenstein D, Abbot P (eds) Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Bilde T, Lubin Y (2011) Group living in spiders: cooperative breeding and coloniality. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Buskirk RE (1986) Orb-weaving spiders in aggregations modify individual web structure. J Arachnol 14:259–265Google Scholar
- Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Farr JA (1977) Social behavior of the golden silk spider, Nephila clavipes (Linnaeus) (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 4:137–144Google Scholar
- Henschel J (1998) Predation on social and solitary individuals of the spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae). J Arachnol 26:61–69Google Scholar
- Higgins LE (1992a) Developmental plasticity and fecundity in the orb-weaving spider Nephila clavipes. J Arachnol 20:94–106Google Scholar
- Hodge MA, Uetz GW (1992) Antipredator benefits of single- and mixed-species grouping by Nephila clavipes (L.) (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Arachnol 20:212–216Google Scholar
- Jakob EM, Porter A, Uetz G (1998) The effect of conspecifics on the timing of orb construction in a colonial spider. J Arachnol 26:335–341Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
- Rayor LS (1996) Attack strategies of predatory wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae; Sphecidae) on colonial orb web-building spiders (Araneidae: Metepeira incrassata). J Kansas Entomol Soc 69:67–75Google Scholar
- Rypstra AL (1985) Aggregations of Nephila clavipes (L.) (Araneae, Araneidae) in relation to prey availability. J Arachnol 13:71–78Google Scholar
- Uetz GW, Hieber CS (1997) Colonial web-building spiders; balancing the costs and benefits of group living. In: Chou JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- World Spider Catalog (2017) World spider catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 18.5. accessed on Dec 11, 2017