Personality variation in two predator species does not impact prey species survival or plant damage in staged mesocosms
Mounting evidence suggests that consistent individual differences in behavior, better known as animal personality, can shape aspects of population and community ecology. Yet, the potential for animal personality to affect more complex and non-linear food webs, like those seen in nature, remains understudied. Here, we explore the degree to which the aggregate behaviors of two predator species simultaneously interact to alter prey survival rates and the presence and magnitude of trophic cascades. We set up mesocosms in an old-field habitat containing four different insect prey species and either two Phidippus clarus (Salticidae), two Platycryptus undatus (Salticidae), or one of each predator. Prior to initiating each mesocosm, we assayed the activity level and boldness of each individual predator and included these metrics in our models predicting prey survival and plant damage. We then compared the number of surviving prey and plant damage under each of these conditions and tested for associations between each of these response variables and predator behavior. We found no significant effect of predator community composition or predators’ behavior on prey survival or plant damage. These results suggest that the effects of predator personality on prey survival may be subtle or absent in complex species interaction modules.
Although much research suggests that animal personality can influence broader scale ecological phenomena, the ability of animal personality to alter complex species interaction modules remains unresolved. We tested whether pairs of predators of different personality types differentially impacted prey survival rates and plant damage in a tritrophic system, and whether these effects varied based on predator community composition. We recovered no evidence that predator personality types influenced prey survival or plant damage regardless of the predator composition considered. These results suggest that the effects of personality may be absent or undetectable in more complex, realistic ecological settings. The majority of laboratory-based personality studies published to date evaluate only dyadic species interactions in simplified environments. Our findings therefore raise concerns that such studies are prone to overestimate the effects of animal personality.
KeywordsIndirect effects Personality Salticidae Temperament Trophic cascades
We thank the University of Pittsburgh and the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology for providing space and materials for our studies. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments were helpful in improving the quality of this paper.
This study received financial support from the Pape and McKinley grants from the University of Pittsburgh’s Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology.
- Belgrad BA, Griffen BD (2016) Predator–prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode. In: Proc R Soc B. The Royal Society, pp 20160408Google Scholar
- Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour 77(4):771-783Google Scholar
- Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. American naturalist:421–425Google Scholar
- Herberstein ME (2011) Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Keiser CN, Pruitt JN (2013) Spider aggressiveness determines the bidirectional consequences of host–inquiline interactions. Behav Ecol :art096Google Scholar
- Lichtenstein JL, Pruitt JN, Modlmeier AP (2015) Intraspecific variation in collective behaviors drives interspecific contests in acorn ants. Behav Ecol :arv188Google Scholar
- Modlmeier AP, Keiser CN, Wright CM, Lichtenstein JL, Pruitt JN (2015) Integrating animal personality into insect population and community ecology. Curr Opin Insect SciGoogle Scholar
- Soluk DA (1993) Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology :219–225Google Scholar
- Toscano BJ, Gownaris NJ, Heerhartz SM, Monaco CJ (2016) Personality, foraging behavior and specialization: integrating behavioral and food web ecology at the individual level. Oecologia:1–15Google Scholar