Advertisement

Correlated evolution of sexually selected traits: interspecific variation in ejaculates, sperm morphology, copulatory mate guarding, and body size in two sympatric species of garter snakes

  • Christopher R. FriesenEmail author
  • Emily J. Uhrig
  • Ehren J. Bentz
  • Leslie A. Blakemore
  • Robert T. Mason
Original Article

Abstract

Male reproductive success is dependent on a correlated suite of traits related to a species’ ecology and mating system dynamics. Closely related species differing in their mating systems and ecology, such as the garter snakes (Thamnophis), are ideal for studying the correlated evolution of sexually selected traits. Here, we compare the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD), copulatory behavior, copulatory plug size, and traits associated with sperm competition between two sympatric and closely related Thamnophis species, T. sirtalis and T. radix with divergent mating aggregation size and density. Our findings indicate that T. sirtalis has greater female-biased SSD, shorter copulations, and larger, more strongly adhering copulatory plugs than T. radix. Our finding that T. sirtalis have longer sperm and higher numbers of sperm per ejaculate is further evidence of more intense sperm competition in this species than in T. radix. However, this reduced number of sperm in the ejaculate means that T. radix males are likely capable of more matings per season than T. sirtalis. This result may reflect differences in feeding during the breeding season (obligate aphagy in T. sirtalis) and the potential for sperm loss in T. radix during prolonged copulations that are prevented in T. sirtlais by their substantial copulatory plugs. Our findings demonstrate that ecological and mating system dynamics have the capacity to strongly influence correlated selection of pre- and postcopulatory traits.

Significance statement

Our findings demonstrate that ecological and mating system dynamics have the capacity to strongly influence correlated selection of, and trade-offs between, pre- and postcopulatory traits. For most postcopulatory selected traits we measured (sperm size, ejaculate size, effectiveness of their copulatory plug, and gamete-somatic index (but not relative testes mass)), the species predicted to experience strong sperm competition (T. sirtalis) has higher trait values. However, T. radix, which has a precopulatory mating advantage (larger male body size and less pronounced female-biased sexual size dimorphism), has enough stored sperm for many more matings. The large amount of stored sperm in T. radix may be due to sperm loss during prolonged matings or different energy budgets between the two species: T. sirtalis, with an evolutionary history of sperm competition, does not eat during the breeding season, which limits the time available for mating.

Keywords

Sexual size dimorphism Sperm competition Copulatory plugs Prolonged copulation Reptile 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mariaelena Del Rio did the sperm counts and C.M. Whittington and two anonymous reviewers gave thoughtful comments and edits that improved the manuscript.

Funding information

CRF is grateful for funding from the NSF (DDIG IOS 1011727 and IPRFB DIB-1308394).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures used in this research were approved by the Oregon State University Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUP no. 4317). This research complied with guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and was carried out under the authority of Manitoba Wildlife Scientific Permit WB12405.

References

  1. Alcock J (1994) Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39(1):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Dixson AF (2002) Sperm competition: motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature 416(6880):496–496.  https://doi.org/10.1038/416496a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnqvist G (2014) Cryptic female choice. In: Shuker DM, Simmons LW (eds) The evolution of insect mating systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 204–220.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678020.003.0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2(3):349–368.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1948.21 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennison C, Hemmings N, Slate J, Birkhead T (2015) Long sperm fertilize more eggs in a bird. Proc R Soc B 282(1799):20141897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75(4):385–407.  https://doi.org/10.1086/393620 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanckenhorn WU, Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ (1995) Time and energy constraints and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism—to eat or to mate? Evol Ecol 9(4):369–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brennan PL, Prum RO (2014) Mechanisms and evidence of genital coevolution: the roles of natural selection, mate choice, and sexual conflict. In: Rice WR, Gavrilets S (eds) The genetics and biology of sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 385–406Google Scholar
  12. Cieslak ES (1945) Relations between the reproductive cycle and the pituitary gland in the snake Thamnophis radix. Physiol Zool 18(3):299–329.  https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.18.3.30151870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox RM, Butler MA, John-Alder HB (2007) The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in reptiles. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Devine MC (1977) Copulatory plugs, restricted mating opportunities and reproductive competition among male garter snakes. Nature 267(5609):345–346.  https://doi.org/10.1038/267345a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixson AF, Anderson MJ (2004) Sexual behavior, reproductive physiology and sperm competition in male mammals. Physiol Behav 83(2):361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.08.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunham A, Rudolf V (2009) Evolution of sexual size monomorphism: the influence of passive mate guarding. J Evol Biol 22(7):1376–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01768.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eady PE, Hamilton L, Lyons RE (2007) Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 274(1607):247–252.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eberhard WG (2010) Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions. Genetica 138(1):5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-009-9358-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edvardsson M, Tregenza T (2005) Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behav Ecol 16(4):788–793.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ari055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emlen DJ (2008) The evolution of animal weapons. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 39(1):387–413.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197(4300):215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) (2007) Sex, size, and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldman A, Meiri S (2013) Length–mass allometry in snakes. Biol J Linn Soc 108(1):161–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.02001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitch HS (1965) An ecological study of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 15:493–564Google Scholar
  26. Fitzpatrick JL, Lupold S (2014) Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. Mol Hum Reprod 20(12):1180–1189.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gau067 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox W (1956) Seminal receptacles of snakes. Anat Rec 124(3):519–539.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091240303 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friesen CR, Shine R, Krohmer RW, Mason RT (2013) Not just a chastity belt: the functional significance of mating plugs in garter snakes, revisited. Biol J Linn Soc 109(4):893–907.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12089
  29. Friesen CR, Kerns A, Mason R (2014a) Factors influencing paternity in multiply mated female red-sided garter snakes and the persistent use of sperm stored over winter. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68(9):1419–1430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1749-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friesen CR, Mason RT, Arnold SJ, Estes S (2014b) Patterns of sperm use in two populations of red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) with long-term female sperm storage. Can J Zool 92(1):33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friesen CR, Squire MK, Mason RT (2014c) Intrapopulational variation of ejaculate traits and sperm depletion in red-sided garter snakes. J Zool 292(3):192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Friesen CR, Uhrig EJ, Squire MK, Mason RT, Brennan PLR (2014d) Sexual conflict over mating in red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) as indicated by experimental manipulation of genitalia. Proc R Soc B 281(1774):20132694.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2694 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friesen CR, Powers DR, Copenhaver PE, Mason RT (2015) Size dependence in non-sperm ejaculate production is reflected in daily energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate. J Exp Biol 218(9):1410–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.120402 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friesen CR, Uhrig EJ, Mason RT, Brennan PL (2016) Female behaviour and the interaction of male and female genital traits mediate sperm transfer during mating. J Evol Biol 29(5):952–964.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12836 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gay L, Hosken DJ, Eady P, Vasudev R, Tregenza T (2011) The evolution of harm—effect of sexual conflicts and population size. Evolution 65(3):725–737.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01181.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ghiselin MT (1976) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  37. Gillingham JC, Carpenter CC, Brecke BJ, Murphy JB (1977) Courtship and copulatory behavior of the Mexican milk snake, Lampropeltis triangulum sinaloae (Colubridae). Southwest Nat 22(2):187–194.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3669809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gregory PT (1974) Patterns of spring emergence of red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in the Interlake region of Manitoba. Can J Zool 52(8):1063–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z74-141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregory PT (1977) Life history parameters of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis pairetalis) in an extreme environment, the Interlake region of Manitoba Canada. National Museum of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  40. Gregory PG (1984) Communal denning in snakes. In: Fitch HS, Seigel RA (eds) Vertebrate ecology and systematics: a tribute to Henry S. Fitch. University of Kansas, Lawrence, pp 57–76Google Scholar
  41. Harts AM, Kokko H (2013) Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one? Evolution 67(10):2838–2848.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12163 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hosokawa T, Nobuhiko S (2001) Significance of prolonged copulation under the restriction of daily reproductive time in the stink bug Megacopta punctatissima (Heteroptera: Plataspidae). Behaviour 94:750–754Google Scholar
  43. Immler S, Pitnick S, Parker GA, Durrant KL, Lüpold S, Calhim S, Birkhead TR (2011) Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(13):5325–5330.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009059108 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson DD, Briskie JV (1999) Sperm competition and sperm length in shorebirds. Condor 101:848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jormalainen V, Merilaita S (1995) Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36(1):43–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Joy JE, Crews D (1985) Social dynamics of group courtship behavior in male red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). J Comp Psychol 99(2):145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.99.2.145 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Joy JE, Crews D (1988) Male mating success in red-sided garter snakes: size is not important. Anim Behav 36(6):1839–1841.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80126-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. King RB, Bittner TD, Queral-Regil A, Cline JH (1999) Sexual dimorphism in neonate and adult snakes. J Zool 247(1):19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00189.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. King RB, Jadin RC, Grue M, Walley HD (2009) Behavioural correlates with hemipenis morphology in new world natricine snakes. Biol J Linn Soc 98(1):110–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01270.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kokko H, Jennions MD (2014) The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Rice WR, Gavrilets S (eds) The genetics and biology of sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 23–35Google Scholar
  51. Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philos T Roy Soc B 361(1466):319–334.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kokko H, Klug H, Jennions MD (2012) Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecol Lett 15(11):1340–1351.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01859.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lessells C, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104(1):116–121.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4087240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lüpold S, Simmons L, Tomkins J, Fitzpatrick J (2015) No evidence for a trade-off between sperm length and male premating weaponry. J Evol Biol 28(12):2187–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12742 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Madsen T, Shine R (1994) Costs of reproduction influence the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in snakes. Evolution 48(4):1389–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05323.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, Novikov D, Stuart WT, Pitnick S (2010) Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328(5976):354–357.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187096 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mason R, MacMillan S, Whittier J, Krohmer R, Koonz W (1991) Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis (red-sided garter snake) population morph variation. Herpetol Rev 22:61Google Scholar
  58. McLain DK (1989) Prolonged copulation as a post-insemination guarding tactic in a natural population of the ragwort seed bug. Anim Behav 38(4):659–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80011-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moore IT, Mason RT (2001) Behavioral and hormonal responses to corticosterone in the male red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Physiol Behav 72(5):669–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00413-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O'Donnell RP, Shine R, Mason RT (2004) Seasonal anorexia in the male red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56(5):413–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0801-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olsson M, Madsen T (1998) Sexual selection and sperm competition in reptiles. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San Diego, pp 503–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50038-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45(4):525–567.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic, New York, pp 123–163Google Scholar
  64. Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50026-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parker GA (2014) The sexual cascade. In: Rice WR, Gavrilets S (eds) The genetics and biology of sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 23–35Google Scholar
  66. Parker GA, Ball MA (2005) Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testis and ejaculate sizes: a population model. Biol Lett 1(2):235–238.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0273 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parker GA, Birkhead TR (2013) Polyandry: the history of a revolution. Philos T Roy Soc B 368:20120041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parker GA, Pizzari T (2010) Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biol Rev 85(4):897–934.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00140.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parker GA, Lessells CM, Simmons LW (2013) Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male–male competition. Evolution 67(1):95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Perry-Richardson JJ, Schofield CW, Ford NB (1990) Courtship of the garter snake, Thamnophis marcianus, with a description of a female behavior for coitus interruption. J Herpetol 24(1):76–78.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1564292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Prosser MR, Weatherhead PJ, Gibbs HL, Brown GP (2002) Genetic analysis of the mating system and opportunity for sexual selection in northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon). Behav Ecol 13(6):800–807.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.6.800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rivas JA, Burghardt GM (2001) Understanding sexual size dimorphism in snakes: wearing the snake’s shoes. Anim Behav 62(3):F1–F6.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rollings N, Uhrig EJ, Krohmer RJ, Waye HL, Mason RT, Olsson M, Whittington CM, Friesen CR (2017) Age-related sex differences in body condition and telomere dynamics of red-sided garter snakes. Proc R Soc B 284(1852):20162146.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2146 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross P, Crews D (1978) Stimuli influencing mating behavior in the garter snake, Thamnophis radix. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4(2):133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rossman DA, Ford NB, Seigel RA (1996) The garter snakes: evolution and ecology. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  76. Saeki Y, Kruse KC, Switzer PV (2005) The social environment affects mate guarding behavior in japanese beetles, Popillia japonica. J Insect Sci 5:18PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shine R (1978) Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia 33(3):269–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348113 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shine R (1991) Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am Nat 138(1):103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1086/285207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shine R (1994) Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994(2):326–346.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1446982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shine R, O'Connor D, Mason RT (2000a) Sexual conflict in the snake den. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48(5):392–401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shine R, Olsson MM, Mason RT (2000b) Chastity belts in gartersnakes: the functional significance of mating plugs. Biol J Linn Soc 70(3):377–390.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01229.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shine R, Olsson MM, Moore I, LeMaster MP, Greene M, Mason RT (2000c) Body size enhances mating success in male garter snakes. Anim Behav 59(3):F4–F11.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1338 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shine R, Elphick MJ, Harlow PS, Moore IT, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2001) Movements, mating, and dispersal of red-sided gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) from a communal den in Manitoba. Copeia 2001(1):82–91.  https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0082:MMADOR]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shine R, Wall M, Langkilde T, Mason RT (2005) Do female garter snakes evade males to avoid harassment or to enhance mate quality? Am Nat 165(6):660–668.  https://doi.org/10.1086/429591 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shine R, Langkilde T, Wall M, Mason RT (2006) Temporal dynamics of emergence and dispersal of garter snakes from a communal den in Manitoba. Wildlife Res 33(2):103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1071/WR05030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Showalter I, Todd BD, Brennan PL (2014) Intraspecific and interspecific variation of female genitalia in two species of watersnake. Biol J Linn Soc 111(1):183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  88. Simmons LW (2014) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Aust Entomol 53(1):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Simmons LW, Emlen DJ (2006) Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(44):16346–16351.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603474103 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Simmons LW, Fitzpatrick JL (2016) Sperm competition and the coevolution of pre-and postcopulatory traits: weapons evolve faster than testes among onthophagine dung beetles. Evolution 70(5):998–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12915 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith CC (2012) Opposing effects of sperm viability and velocity on the outcome of sperm competition. Behav Ecol 23(4):820–826.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Taylor ML, Price TAR, Wedell N (2014) Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 29(7):376–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Telford SR, Dangerfield JM (1989) Manipulation of the sex ratio and duration of copulation in the tropical millipede Alloporus uncinatus: a test of the copulatory guarding hypothesis. Anim Behav 40:984–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tourmente M, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS, Giojalas LC, Chiaraviglio M (2009) Sperm competition and reproductive mode influence sperm dimensions and structure among snakes. Evolution 63(10):2513–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00739.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tourmente M, Giojalas LC, Chiaraviglio M (2011) Sperm parameters associated with reproductive ecology in two snake species. Herpetologica 67(1):58–70.  https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-10-00052.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tuttle KN, Gregory PT (2014) Reproduction of the plains garter snake, Thamnophis radix, near its northern range limit: more evidence for a “fast” life history. Copeia 2014(1):130–135.  https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-13-119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Uller T, Olsson M (2008) Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes. Mol Ecol 17(11):2566–2580.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03772.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. van Lieshout E, McNamara KB, Simmons LW (2014) Why do female Callosobruchus maculatus kick their mates? PLoS One 9(4):e95747.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095747 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vincent SE, Herrel A (2007) Functional and ecological correlates of ecologically-based dimorphisms in squamate reptiles. Integr Comp Biol 47(2):172–188.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icm019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vitta ACR, Lorenzo MG (2009) Copulation and mate guarding behavior in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J Med Entomol 46(4):789–795.  https://doi.org/10.1603/033.046.0409 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Weatherhead PJ, Barry FE, Brown GP, Forbes MR (1995) Sex ratios, mating behavior and sexual size dimorphism of the northern water snake, Nerodia sipedon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36(5):301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Weatherhead PJ, Prosser MR, Gibbs HL, Brown GP (2002) Male reproductive success and sexual selection in northern water snakes determined by microsatellite DNA analysis. Behav Ecol 13(6):808–815.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.6.808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. White CR (2003) Allometric analysis beyond heterogeneous regression slopes: use of the Johnson-Neyman technique in comparative biology. Physiol Biochem Zool 76(1):135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1086/367939 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wusterbarth T, King RB, Duvall MR, Grayburn WS, Burghardt GM (2010) Phylogenetically widespread multiple paternity in new world natricine snakes. Herpetol Conserv Biol 2010:86–93Google Scholar
  105. Yamamura N (1986) An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) model of postcopulatory guarding in insects. Theor Popul Biol 29(3):438–455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(86)90018-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher R. Friesen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Emily J. Uhrig
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ehren J. Bentz
    • 2
  • Leslie A. Blakemore
    • 2
  • Robert T. Mason
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Integrative BiologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations