Phenotypic correlations capture between-individual correlations underlying behavioral syndromes
- 465 Downloads
The presence of variation in behavior on the between-individual level is considered the hallmark of personality. In contrast, behavioral syndromes are commonly recognized when documented on the phenotypic level, which is a mix of between-individual and residual (within-individual) correlations. Phenotypic and between-individual correlations need not align, and investigations on different levels of the same syndrome may hence lead to opposite inferences. Between-individual correlations, arguably, provide stronger evidence for an intrinsically determined behavioral syndrome than phenotypic correlations. We compiled 109 literature estimates of between-individual and phenotypic correlations between behaviors from 30 studies, performed on 22 species covering a wide range of taxa. Contrary to our expectation, the phenotypic correlation in behaviors was, on average, a reasonable predictor of the between-individual correlation in terms of magnitude and sign. Although our finding does not warrant the use of the phenotypic correlation as a suitable approximation of the between-individual correlation for any particular study, it does suggest that the phenotypic correlations used to infer the majority of behavioral syndromes to date have provided a reasonable characterization of syndrome associative strength.
Aspects of personality often correlate and are then said to form a behavioral syndrome. Syndromes are interesting because they signal that multiple behaviors may share causal drivers. Most syndromes to date are based on correlations of measured behaviors (phenotypes), but any pattern on the phenotypic level is likely influenced by uncontrolled associations between the focal behaviors which are expected to reduce the phenotypic correlation relative to the correlation on the underlying individual level. If so, behavioral ecologists may have underestimated the associative strength of behavioral syndromes. Based on over 100 published estimates of individual-level and phenotypic correlations between aspects of personality, we show that the phenotypic correlation provides a reasonable estimate of the magnitude and sign of individual-level correlations.
KeywordsAnimal personality Behavioral syndrome Mixed model Variance partitioning Correlation
We thank Alexander Weiss for an invitation which proved to be the initiation of this work. Two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor are thanked for constructive comments which clearly improved the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
This work is a compilation of published work performed on animals, and the ethical considerations of working with experimental animals have been detailed in the original publications cited in this paper. This work does not include research on humans or primates.
The study was financially supported by funding from the Academy of Finland (to JEB) and the Graduate School in Biology, Geography and Geology (to BC).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Garamszegi LZ, Markó G, Herczeg G (2013) A meta-analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: relationships between particular behavioral traits. Behavioral Ecology 24:1068–1080Google Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R, Butler D (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
- Grafen A (1984) Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hall ML, van Asten T, Katsis AC, Dingemanse NJ, Magrath MJ, Mulder RA (2015) Animal personality and pace-of-life syndromes: do fast-exploring fairy-wrens die young? Front Ecol Evol 3:28Google Scholar
- Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MAW, Blokhuis HJ (1999) Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 23:925–935Google Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prenton Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar