Hungry for quality—individual bumblebees forage flexibly to collect high-quality pollen
- 848 Downloads
Nutritional deficits may be one factor contributing to the ongoing decline of wild and managed bees. As a consequence, interest in understanding the effect of floral resource availability on nutritional intake - and subsequently bee health and performance - has increased. However, the proximate mechanisms underlying bee foraging choices are still poorly understood. We do, for instance, not yet know whether and how bees assess the nutritional quality of pollen or whether they use information on pollen quality to adjust foraging patterns. In a previous study, we showed that Bombus terrestris workers use their sense of taste to discriminate pollen differing in concentration and, thus, nutrient content. We now investigated whether they translate this ability into foraging behavior by observing microcolonies offered the choice between two feeders containing different pollen types and concentrations and, thus, qualities. We examined whether bumblebees used direct (chemotactile) or indirect (olfactory) cues to assess pollen quality and whether they individually assessed pollen quality or relied on larval feedback. By changing pollen quality after 21 days, we further tested whether information on pollen quality was subsequently associated with other (faster assessable) cues (e.g., odor) or continuously re-assessed. We found that bees always preferred pollen of higher quality and individually assessed quality based on chemotactile cues. Moreover, changing pollen quality resulted in rapid equivalent changes in foraging behavior, even without feedback from larvae. Consequently, individual bumblebee foragers continuously re-assess pollen quality to provide their colonies with high-quality food.
The ongoing decline of wild and managed bees is likely driven by several factors with nutritional deficits being one of them. Because bees are amongst the most important pollinators, interest in understanding the effect of floral resource availability on nutritional intake and, subsequently, bee health and performance has increased. However, the proximate mechanisms underlying bee foraging choices are still poorly understood. In this study, we investigated how bumblebees differentiate between different pollen qualities by observing microcolonies offered the choice between different diets. We found that bees always preferred pollen of higher quality and individually assessed quality based on chemotactile cues. This finding increases our understanding of how social bees assess nutritional quality and make appropriate foraging choices.
KeywordsBee decline Nutrients Nutrition Optimal foraging Pollen Protein
We thank Alexander Keller for the DNA meta-barcoding analysis of the honeybee-collected pollen and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments which greatly helped to improve our manuscript. Funding for SDL and FAR was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG projects: LE 2750/1-1 and LE 2750/5-1), and SDL was further supported by a grant of the German Excellence Initiative to the Graduate School of Life Sciences, University of Würzburg (Postdoc Plus).
The study was conceived by SDL and JS and performed by FAR. FAR, SDL, and JS wrote the manuscript.
- Brunner FS, Schmid-Hempel P, Barribeau SM (2014) Protein-poor diet reduces host-specific immune gene expression in Bombus terrestris. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 281Google Scholar
- Campbell NA (1997) Biologie. Spektrum Akademischer VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Chapman RF (1998) The insects: structure and function. Cambridge university pressGoogle Scholar
- DeGroot AP (1953) Protein and amino acid requirements of the honey bee (Apis mellifica L.). Phys Comp Oecol 3:197–285Google Scholar
- Duchateau MJ, Velthuis HHW (1989) Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomol Exp Appl 51:199–213Google Scholar
- Erhardt GM (1996) Blütenökologische Untersuchungen an Aconitum lycoctonum (Ranunculaceae) und Bombus gerstaeckeri (Hymenoptera, Apidae). PhD ThesisGoogle Scholar
- Goulson D (2003) Bumblebees: their behaviour and ecology. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D (2012) The nature of nutrition: a unifying framework from animal adaptation to human obesity. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Somerville DC (2001) Nutritional value of bee collected pollens. RIRDC Publication, NSW AgricultureGoogle Scholar
- Tiedeken EJ, Stout JC, Stevenson PC, Wright GA (2014) Bumblebees are not deterred by ecologically relevant concentrations of nectar toxins. J Exp BiolGoogle Scholar
- Vaudo AD, Patch HM, Mortensen DA, Grozinger CM, Tooker JF (2014) Bumble bees exhibit daily behavioral patterns in pollen foraging. Arthropod-Plant Interact 8:273–283Google Scholar