A comparative perspective on the ecology of morphological diversification in complex societies: nesting ecology and soldier evolution in the turtle ants
This work uses a comparative framework to address the adaptive evolutionary relationship between nesting ecology and the morphological diversification of the soldier caste in turtle ants (Cephalotes). Turtle ant colonies nest in pre-existing arboreal cavities, and soldiers specialize in colony defense by blocking cavity entrances with their armored heads. Analyses were focused on three major axes of soldier morphological diversification: discrete morphotype, head size, and head-size range (i.e., soldier polymorphism). The analyses showed that while all species use some entrances small enough to fit the head of one soldier, specialization on entrances that tightly fit the head of one soldier was only seen in species with the most specialized soldier morphotype. They also showed that the degree of soldier polymorphism was only positively correlated with the typical range of entrances in species with the most specialized morphotype. Overall, these findings indicated that a tight 1:1 size-matching between available soldier head sizes and selected entrance sizes is limited to species with the most specialized soldier morphotype, while species with less specialized morphotypes use a broader range of larger entrances. Together, these findings suggest a new general hypothesis for the adaptive diversification of caste systems: major shifts in ecological specialization drive the evolution of novel caste morphotypes, while minor expansions and contractions of an existing resource range shape the evolution of the size distribution of an existing caste. Broadly, these findings highlight the possibility for complex coupling and decoupling between different axes of caste diversification in lineages with complex social phenotypes.
One key way in which complex "organismal societies" have diversified in form and function is via the evolution of morphologically distinct "castes" that specialize on particular social roles. Nevertheless, how ecological interactions shape caste diversification within social lineages remains poorly understood. Using a comparative framework, this work addresses how nesting ecology has shaped the diversification of an elaborate soldier caste in the turtle ants. The evolution of more specialized soldier types was associated with substantial shifts in nest-entrance specialization, while in species with the most specialized soldier type, there was also a match between head sizes and entrance sizes within and across species. These findings suggest the general hypothesis that the evolution of novel caste types is driven by major shifts in ecological specialization, while the size distribution of existing castes tracks minor shifts in resource use.
KeywordsCaste evolution Social organization Ecological specialization Size-matching Cephalotes
This work is indebted to the taxonomic work on the genus Cephalotes by many authors, and especially the most recent, synthetic treatment of the group by M. L. de Andrade and C. Baroni Urbani. I thank Kleber Del Claro, Heraldo Vasconcelos, and Corrie Moreau for help with fieldwork logistics. I also thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by NSF grant DEB 0842144, an 1851 Research Fellowship from the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851, and research funds from the George Washington University.
- Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR, Crespi B (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0717:tfpsic]2.0.co;2
- Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. (Facsimile of 1st edition, 1964). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- de Andrade ML, Baroni Urbani C (1999) Diversity and adaptation in the ant genus Cephalotes, past and present. Stuttgarter Beitr Naturk Ser B 271:1–889Google Scholar
- Dornhaus A, Powell S (2010) Foraging and defence strategies. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abott KL (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 210–230Google Scholar
- Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15. doi: 10.1086/284325
- Irschick D, Dyer L, Sherry TW (2005) Phylogenetic methodologies for studying specialization. Oikos 110:404–408. doi: 10.2307/3548481?ref=no-x-route:4b549cd8ee0052f607e462ad017fdd31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Irschick DJ, Meyers JJ, Husak JF, Le Galliard J-F (2008) How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evol Ecol Res 10:177–196Google Scholar
- Kempf WW (1951) A taxonomic study on the ant tribe Cephalotini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revta Bras Ent 21:1–244Google Scholar
- Mcginley RH, Prenter J, Taylor W (2013) Whole-organism performance in a jumping spider, Servaea incana (Araneae: Salticidae): links with morphology and between performance traits. Biol J Linnean Soc 110:644–657. doi: 10.1111/bij.12155
- Mertl A, Traniello J (2009) Behavioral evolution in the major worker subcaste of twig-nesting Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): does morphological specialization influence task plasticity? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1411–1426. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0797-3
- Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz SA, Isaac N, Pearse W (2015) caper: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R version 0.5.2Google Scholar
- Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Rasband WS (1997–2012) ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, imagej.nih.gov/ij/Google Scholar
- Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Strassmann JE, Queller DC (2010) The social organism: congresses, parties, and committees. Evolution 64:605–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00929.x
- Svensson E, Calsbeek R (eds) (2012) The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Team RC (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler WM (1910) Ants: their structure, development and behavior. The Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar