Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 285–291 | Cite as

Early developmental processes limit socially mediated phenotypic plasticity in an ant

  • Irene Villalta
  • Olivier Blight
  • Elena Angulo
  • Xim Cerdá
  • Raphaël Boulay
Original Article

Abstract

Caste determination in social insects has long been considered to exemplify socially mediated phenotypic plasticity: young larvae can develop into queens or workers depending on the social environment. However, recent studies have challenged this view by showing that, in some species, larval development can be biased early by factors such as larval genotype. We analyzed this issue in the ant species Aphaenogaster senilis. First, we found that the probability that a larva develops into a queen or a worker varies consistently among colonies. Next, we conducted a cross-fostering experiment in which larvae from colonies with relatively low queen production were transferred to colonies with relatively high queen production and vice versa. The results show a strong significant interaction between early determination and worker control of larval caste fate. Therefore, our study shows that socially mediated phenotypic plasticity is limited by processes occurring at an early developmental stage that possibly include direct or indirect genetic effects or non-genetic maternal effects.

Keywords

Social behavior Caste development Phenotypic plasticity Colony level selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ines Ocon Santamaria and Séverine Devers for their help with the experiments and Jessica Pearce for her English editing services. We thank Claudie Doums and three anonymous referees for their comments on an early version of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the FEDER (CGL2012-36181).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

265_2015_2052_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Figure S1 Proportion of queens produced among the female pupae in function of the colony size (original number of workers in the colony). Red and black triangles are HWinter and LWinter, respectively: colonies with relatively high and low queen production in winter. Blue and green circles are HSpring and LSpring, respectively: colonies with relatively high and low queen production in spring. (DOCX 36 kb)
265_2015_2052_MOESM2_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Table S1 Results of the experiment 1 showing the total production of females (=FEM) and the proportion of queens among the females (P(Q)) in different colonies collected in winter and spring as a function of the colony size (initial number of workers), queen weight (in mg), and the number of surviving workers. (DOCX 23 kb)
265_2015_2052_MOESM3_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Table S2 Results of the experiment 2 showing the total production of females (=FEM) and the proportion of queens among the females (P(Q)) in six different experimental conditions (treatment). H colonies with high queen production in experiment 1, L colonies with low queen production in experiment 1, Control larvae of the same colony as the workers. (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Alaux C, Jaisson P, Hefetz A (2005) Reproductive decision-making in semelparous colonies of the bumblebee bombus terrestris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amor F, Ortega P, Jowers MJ, Cerdá X, Billen J, Lenoir A, Boulay R (2011) The evolution of worker–queen polymorphism in Cataglyphis ants: interplay between individual-and colony-level selections. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1473–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anscombe F (1948) The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative binomial data. Biometrical 35:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett M (1947) The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blight O, Albet Díaz-Mariblanca G, Cerdá X, Boulay R (2015) Ecological implications of consistent colony-level behavioural differences in a social insect. Behav Ecol. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv127
  6. Boulay R, Hefetz A, Cerdá X, Devers S, Francke W, Twele R, Lenoir A (2007) Production of sexuals in a fission-performing ant: dual effects of queen pheromones and colony size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1531–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulay R, Cerdá X, Fertin A, Ichinose K, Lenoir A (2009) Brood development into sexual females depends on the presence of a queen but not on temperature in an ant dispersing by colony fission, Aphaenogaster senilis. Ecol Entomol 34:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brian MV (1957) Caste determination in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 2:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caut S, Jowers MJ, Arnan X, Pearce-Duvet J, Rodrigo A, Cerdá X, Boulay R (2014) The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation. Ecol Evol 4:35–49PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman BB, Thain H, Coughlin J, Hughes WO (2011) Behavioural syndromes at multiple scales in Myrmica ants. Anim Behav 82:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chéron B, Doums C, Federici P, Monnin T (2009) Queen replacement in the monogynous ant Aphaenogaster senilis: supernumerary queens as life insurance. Anim Behav 78:1317–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chéron B, Cronin AL, Doums C, Fédérici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T (2011) Unequal resource allocation among colonies produced by fission in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecology 92:1448–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crozier RH (1973) Apparent differential selection at an isozyme locus between queens and workers of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Genetics 73:313–318PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dingemanse NJ, Araya-Ajoy YG (2015) Interacting personalities: behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 30:88–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P (2012) irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. http://www.CRANR-projectorg/package=irr
  17. Goulson D (2003) Bumblebees: their behaviour and ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes WO, Boomsma JJ (2008) Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:5150–5153PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwanishi S, Shin S, Ohkawara K (2007) Biasing mechanisms for the sex investment ratio in the monogynous and monandrous ant Aphaenogaster smythiesi japonica Forel. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:275–289Google Scholar
  20. Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, Sih A (2014) Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 89:48–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Julian GE, Fewell JH, Gadau J, Johnson RA, Larrabee D (2002) Genetic determination of the queen caste in an ant hybrid zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8157–8160PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kamakura M (2011) Royalactin induces queen differentiation in honeybees. Nature 473:478–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ledoux A (1976) Inhibition exercée sur l’apparition de nouvelles femelles ailées, par la femelle reine pondeuse chez Aphaenogaster senilis (Hyméoptère Formicoidea). CR Acad Sci D Nat 283:1197–1200Google Scholar
  24. Ledoux A (1981) Conséquences de l’orphelinage sur la biologie des colonies d’Aphaenogaster senilis (Mayr.) (Hymenoptera Formicoidea). CR Acad Sci III-vie 293:237–240Google Scholar
  25. Leniaud L, Darras H, Boulay R, Aron S (2012) Social hybridogenesis in the clonal ant Cataglyphis hispanica. Curr Biol 22:1188–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Libbrecht R, Schwander T, Keller L (2011) Genetic component to caste allocation in a multiple-queen ant species. Evolution 65:2907–2915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Libbrecht R, Corona M, Wende F, Azevedo DO, Serrão JE, Keller L (2013) Interplay between insulin signaling, juvenile hormone, and vitellogenin regulates maternal effects on polyphenism in ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:11050–11055PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linksvayer TA (2006) Direct, maternal, and sibsocial genetic effects on individual and colony traits in an ant. Evolution 60:2552–2561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linksvayer TA (2007) Ant species size differences are determined by epistasis between brood and worker genomes. PLoS One 2:e994PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Linksvayer TA, Kaftanoglu O, Akyol E, Blatch S, Amdam G, Page R Jr (2011) Larval and nurse worker control of developmental plasticity and the evolution of honey bee queen-worker dimorphism. J Evol Biol 24:1939–1948PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Modlmeier AP, Liebmann JE, Foitzik S (2012) Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants. Proc R Soc B 279:2142–2150PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Passera L (1980) La ponte d’oeufs préorientés chez la fourmi Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera-Formicidae). Insect Soc 27:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pereboom J, Velthuis H, Duchateau M (2003) The organisation of larval feeding in bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) and its significance to caste differentiation. Insect Soc 50:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  35. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramm SA, Stockley P (2009) Adaptive plasticity of mammalian sperm production in response to social experience. Proc R Soc B 276:745–751PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodd FH, Reznick DN, Sokolowski MB (1997) Phenotypic plasticity in the life history traits of guppies: responses to social environment. Ecology 78:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruel C, Cerdá X, Boulay R (2012) Behaviour-mediated group size effect constrains reproductive decisions in a social insect. Anim Behav 84:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruel C, Cerdá X, Boulay R (2013) Surface lipids of queen-laid eggs do not regulate queen production in a fission-performing ant. Naturwissenschaften 100:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwander T, Keller L (2008) Genetic compatibility affects queen and worker caste determination Science 322: 552Google Scholar
  41. Schwander T, Keller L (2012) Evolution: sociality as a driver of unorthodox reproduction. Curr Biol 22:R525–R527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwander T, Humbert J-Y, Brent CS, Cahan SH, Chapuis L, Renai E, Keller L (2008) Maternal effect on female caste determination in a social insect. Curr Biol 18:265–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwander T, Lo N, Beekman M, Oldroyd BP, Keller L (2010) Nature versus nurture in social insect caste differentiation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seeley TD (2009) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith CR, Suarez AV (2010) The trophic ecology of castes in harvester ant colonies. Funct Ecol 24:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Suzzoni JP, Passera L, Strambi A (1980) Ecdysteroid titre and caste determination in the ant, Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 36:1228–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teseo S, Châline N, Jaisson P, Kronauer D (2014) Epistasis between adults and larvae underlies caste fate and fitness in a clonal ant. Nat Commun 5:3363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Torossian C (1958) L’aliment proctodéale chez la fourmi Dolichoderus quadripunctatus (Dolichoderidae). CR Acad Sci D Nat 246:3524–3526Google Scholar
  49. Tschinkel WR (1993) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol Monogr 63:425–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tschinkel WR (1998) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season. Insect Soc 45:385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Villalta I, Angulo E, Devers S, Cerdá X, Boulay R (2015) Regulation of worker egg-laying by larvae in a fission-performing ant. Anim Behav 106:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Villalta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olivier Blight
    • 1
    • 3
  • Elena Angulo
    • 1
  • Xim Cerdá
    • 1
  • Raphaël Boulay
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Estación Biológica de Doñana – CSICSevillaSpain
  2. 2.Institut de Recherches sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, CNRS UMR 7261Université François Rabelais de ToursToursFrance
  3. 3.Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie, Université d’Avignon et des Pays de VaucluseUMR CNRS IRD Aix Marseille UniversitéAvignonFrance

Personalised recommendations