Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 69, Issue 11, pp 1785–1794

Male orang-utan bimaturism and reproductive success at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia

  • Graham L. Banes
  • Biruté M. F. Galdikas
  • Linda Vigilant
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1991-0

Cite this article as:
Banes, G.L., Galdikas, B.M.F. & Vigilant, L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2015) 69: 1785. doi:10.1007/s00265-015-1991-0

Abstract

Unlike most mammals, male orang-utans exhibit bimaturism, in that mature individuals express one of two distinct morphological forms. Socially subordinate, ‘unflanged’ males are comparable to females in their size and facial morphology, while socially dominant ‘flanged’ males exhibit extreme sexual dimorphism and secondary sexual characteristics, primarily in the form of cheek pads (‘flanges’). Although male ornaments in other species are often phenotypically plastic, such characteristics in orang-utans are irreversible—and, given that both morphs are sexually mature and can father offspring—their adaptive significance remains unclear. We determined paternity of orang-utans at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, within the home range of one long-term dominant male, Kusasi, before, during and after his period of dominance, in comparison with subordinate male conspecifics. We found that Kusasi fathered substantially more offspring conceived during his dominant period than any other male and that socially subordinate, unflanged males only fathered offspring during periods of rank instability. We conclude that orang-utan male bimaturism is consistent with an evolutionarily stable reproductive strategy and that reproduction within the range of a dominant, flanged male is highly skewed in his favour, while unflanged males may largely wait for reproductive opportunities.

Keywords

Male bimaturism Sexual selection Secondary sexual characteristics Paternity Reproductive success 

Supplementary material

265_2015_1991_MOESM1_ESM.docx (41 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 41 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  2. 2.Division of Biological Anthropology, Department of Archaeology and AnthropologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations