Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 69, Issue 10, pp 1631–1638 | Cite as

Hierarchical analysis of avian re-nesting behavior: mean, across-individual, and intra-individual responses

  • Christa BeckmannEmail author
  • Peter A. Biro
  • Kathy Martin
Original Article

Abstract

Anti-predator behavior is a key aspect of life history evolution, usually studied at the population (mean), or across-individual levels. However individuals can also differ in their intra-individual (residual) variation, but to our knowledge, this has only been studied once before in free-living animals. Here we studied the distances moved and changes in nest height and concealment between successive nesting attempts of marked pairs of grey fantails (Rhipidura albiscapa) in relation to nest fate, across the breeding season. We predicted that females (gender that decides where the nest is placed) should on average show adaptive behavioral responses to the experience of prior predation risk such that after an unsuccessful nesting attempt, replacement nests should be further away, higher from the ground, and more concealed compared with replacement nests after successful nesting attempts. We found that, on average, females moved greater distances to re-nest after unsuccessful nesting attempts (abandoned or depredated) in contrast to after a successful attempt, suggesting that re-nesting decisions are sensitive to risk. We found no consistent across-individual differences in distances moved, heights, or concealment. However, females differed by 53-fold (or more) in their intra-individual variability (i.e., predictability) with respect to distances moved and changes in nest height between nesting attempts, indicating that either some systematic variation went unexplained and/or females have inherently different predictability. Ignoring these individual differences in residual variance in our models obscured the effect of nest fate on re-nesting decisions that were evident at the mean level.

Keywords

Nest desertion Nest depredation Nest site selection Personality Renest Plasticity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Alfred Deakin Research Postdoctoral Fellowship to CB, an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship to PB, and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada research grant to KM. J Hightower and C Jordan helped with field work. We thank the rangers at Mt. Buffalo National Park for logistical support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

265_2015_1974_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (97 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 97 kb)

References

  1. Ackerman JT, Eadie JM, Yarris GS, Loughman DL, McLandress MR (2003) Cues for investment: nest desertion in response to partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks. Anim Behav 66:871–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amo L, Visser ME, van Oers K (2011) Smelling out predators is innate in birds. Ardea 99:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayly KL, Blumstein DT (2001) Pied Currawongs and the decline of native birds. Emu 101:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger-Tal R, Berger-Tal O, Munro K (2010) Nest desertion by grey fantails during nest building in response to perceived predation risk. J Field Ornithol 81:151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biro PA, Adriaenssens B (2013) Predictability as a personality trait: consistent differences in intraindividual behavioral variation. Am Nat 182:621–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulton RL, Cassey P, Schipper C, Clarke MF (2003) Nest site selection by yellow-faced honeyeaters Lichenostomus chrysops. J Avian Biol 34:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briffa M (2013) Plastic proteans: reduced predictability in the face of predation risk in hermit crabs. Biol Lett 9:20130592PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burhans DE, Frank RT III (1998) Effects of time and nest-site characteristics on concealment of songbird nests. Condor 100:663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleasby I, Nakagawa S (2011) Neglected biological patterns in the residuals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2361–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2015) Quantifying the predictability of behaviour: statistical approaches for the study of between-individual variation in the within-individual variance. Methods Ecol Evol 6:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collias NE, Collias EC (1984) Nest building and bird behavior. Princeton University Press Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colombelli-Négrel D, Kleindorfer S (2009) Nest height, nest concealment, and predator type predict nest predation in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Ecol Res 24:921–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, Van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dohm MR (2002) Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability. Funct Ecol 16:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Gavin TA, Bollinger EK (1988) Reproductive correlates of breeding-site fidelity in Bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). Ecology 69:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Götmark F, Blomqvist D, Olof CJ, Bergkvist J (1995) Nest site selection: a trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings? J Avian Biol 26:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham DS (1988) Responses of five host species to cowbird parasitism. Condor 90:588–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greig‐Smith P (1982) Weight differences, brood reduction, and sibling competition among nestling stonechats Saxicola torquata (Aves: Turdidae). J Zool 205:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grzybowski JA, Pease CM, Brittingham M (2005) Renesting determines seasonal fecundity in songbirds: What do we know? What should we assume? Auk 122:280–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haas CA (1998) Effects of prior nesting success on site fidelity and breeding dispersal: an experimental approach. Auk 115:929–936Google Scholar
  22. Higgins S, Peter P, Cowling J (2006) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. vol. 7: Part B, boatbills to starlings. In: Á Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Howlett JS, Stutchbury BJM (1997) Within-season dispersal, nest-site modification, and predation in renesting hooded warblers. Wilson Bull 109:643–649Google Scholar
  24. Institute S (2010) User’s guide. Version 9.2, vol 1. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  25. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Littell RC, Milliken G, Stroup W, Wolfinger R, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, CaryGoogle Scholar
  27. Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ, Yasukawa K (2006) Nests without eggs: abandonment or cryptic predation? Auk 123:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Major RE, Gowing G, Kendal CE (1996) Nest predation in Australian urban environments and the role of the pied currawong, Strepera graculina. Aust J Ecol 21:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marjakangas A, Valkeajärvi P, Ijäs L (1997) Female black grouseTetrao tetrix shift nest site after nest loss. J Ornithol 138:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin TE, Roper JJ (1988) Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the hermit thrush. Condor 90:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marzluff JM (1988) Do pinyon jays alter nest placement based on prior experience? Anim Behav 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKibbin R, Bishop CA (2014) Multiple broods and nest success in western yellow-breasted chats (Icteria virens auricollis) in the south Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Wilson J Ornithol 126:767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munro K (2007) Breeding behaviour and ecology of the grey fantail (Rhipidura albiscapa). Aust J Zool 55:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson KJ, Martin K (1999) Thermal aspects of nest-site location for vesper sparrows and horned larks in British Columbia. Stud Avian Biol 19:137–143Google Scholar
  35. Nolan VJ (1978) The ecology and behavior of the prairie warbler Dendroica discolor. Ornithol Monogr 26:1–595Google Scholar
  36. Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2005) Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 142:1377–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reznick DA, Bryga H, Endler JA (1990) Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346:357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricklefs RE (1969) An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson Contrib Zool 9:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ronnegard L, Felleki M, Fikse F, Mulder H, Strandberg E (2010) Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance - estimation of variance components using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genet Sel Evol 42:8–15PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Skutch AF (1985) Clutch size, nesting success, and predation on nests of neotropical birds, reviewed. Ornithol Monogr 36:575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stamps JA, Briffa M, Biro PA (2012) Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV). Anim Behav 83:1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Oers K, Drent PJ, de Goede P, van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westneat DF, Schofield M, Wright J (2013) Parental behavior exhibits among-individual variance, plasticity, and heterogeneous residual variance. Behav Ecol 24:598–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Westneat DF, Wright J, Dingemanse NJ (2014) The biology hidden inside residual within-individual phenotypic variation. Biol Rev. doi: 10.1111/brv.12131
  45. Wood K (1998) Seasonal changes in diet of pied currawongs Strepera graculina at Wollongong, New South Wales. Emu 98:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christa Beckmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter A. Biro
    • 1
  • Kathy Martin
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Environment CanadaDeltaCanada

Personalised recommendations