Sperm whale echolocation behaviour reveals a directed, prior-based search strategy informed by prey distribution
Predators make foraging decisions based upon sensory information about resource availability, but little is known about how large, air-breathing predators collect and use such information to maximize energy returns when foraging in the deep sea. Here, we used archival tags to study how echolocating sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) use their long-range sensory capabilities to guide foraging in a deep-water habitat consisting of multiple, depth-segregated prey layers. Sperm whales employ a directed search behaviour by modulating their overall sonar sampling with the intention to exploit a particular prey layer. They forage opportunistically during some descents while actively adjusting their acoustic gaze to sequentially track different prey layers. While foraging within patches, sperm whales adjust their clicking rate both to search new water volumes as they turn and to match the prey distribution. This strategy increases information flow and suggests that sperm whales can perform auditory stream segregation of multiple targets when echolocating. Such flexibility in sampling tactics in concert with long-range sensing capabilities apparently allow sperm whales to efficiently locate and access prey resources in vast, heterogeneous, deep water habitats.
KeywordsSperm whales Echolocation behaviour Directed search behaviour Prior information Multi-target acoustic scene
We dedicate this paper to Bertel Møhl who has pioneered studies of sperm whale echolocation. We thank all captains and crew during the research cruises for their dedicated assistance. The fieldwork was funded by a grant from the Carlsberg Foundation to B. Møhl and ONR, SERDP and FNU grants to MJ, PJOM and PTM. PJOM was supported by a Royal Society Fellowship, NAS by the International Campus of Excellence of the Canary Islands, MJ by the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland and AF partly by project CETOBAPH (grant number CGL2009-1311218).
The study complied with the laws of Norway. The whales were tagged under permit no. 2005/7720-1 to PTM and no. S-2007/61201 to P. Kvadsheim from the Norwegian Animal Research Authority. The tagging methodology was approved by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution animal use and care committee.
- Bar-Shalom Y, Li XR, Kirubarajan T (2004) Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation: theory algorithms and software. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bell WJ (1991) Searching behaviour—the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Berzin AA (1972) The sperm whale. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
- Crocker DE, Gales NJ, Costa DP (2001) Swimming and foraging strategies of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri). J Zool 254:267–277Google Scholar
- Fox J (2002) An R and S-Plus companion to applied regression. Sage, CAGoogle Scholar
- Johnson MP, Hickmott LS, Aguilar Soto N, Madsen PT (2008) Echolocation behaviour adapted to prey in foraging Blainville’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris). Proc R Soc Lond B 275:133–139Google Scholar
- Madsen PT, Aguilar Soto N, Arranz P, Johnson M (2013) Echolocation in Blainville’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris). J Comp Physiol A 1–19Google Scholar
- Moss CF, Surlykke A (2010) Probing the natural scene by echolocating bats. Front Behav Neurosci 4:1–16Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Wilson RP (2003) Penguins predict their performance. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 249:305–310Google Scholar
- Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. Ecol Soc Am 80:1019–1030Google Scholar