Copulation duration, but not paternity share, potentially mediates inbreeding avoidance in Drosophila montana
- 342 Downloads
Studying the incidence of inbreeding avoidance is important for understanding the evolution of mating systems, especially in the context of mate choice for genetic compatibility. We investigated whether inbreeding avoidance mechanisms have evolved in the malt fly, Drosophila montana, by measuring mating latency (a measure of male attractiveness), copulation duration, days to remating, offspring production, and the proportion of offspring sired by the first (P1) and second (P2) male to mate in full-sibling and unrelated pairs. SNP markers were used for paternity analysis and for calculating pairwise relatedness values (genotype sharing) between mating pairs. We found 18 % inbreeding depression in egg-to-adult viability, suggesting that mating with close relatives is costly. Copulation duration was shorter between previously mated females and their brothers than with unrelated males. Based on an earlier study, shorter copulation is likely to decrease the number of inbred progeny by decreasing female remating time. However, shorter copulations did not lead to lower paternity (P2) of full-sibling males. Progeny production of double-mated females was lower when the second male was a full-sibling as compared to an unrelated male, but we could not distinguish between inbreeding depression and lower female reproductive effort after mating with a relative. Relatedness estimates based on 34 SNPs did not detect any quantitative effect of relatedness variation on copulation duration and progeny production. We suggest that inbreeding depression has been strong enough to select for inbreeding avoidance mechanisms in our Finnish D. montana population.
KeywordsSNP genotyping Inbreeding depression Bayesian statistics Beta-binomial distribution
O.A.-H was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant number 250999) and PV & MGR were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NE/E015255/1). We thank Anneli Hoikkala for access to the fly population.
The experiments performed comply with the current laws of UK, in which they were performed.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- Aspi J (1992) Incidence and adaptive significance of multiple mating in females of 2 boreal Drosophila virilis group species. Ann Zool Fenn 29:147–159Google Scholar
- Kraemer P, Gerlach G (2013) Demerelate: functions to calculate relatedness on diploid genetic data. R package version 0.8-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Demerelate
- Lakovaara S (1969) Malt as a culture medium for Drosophila species. Dros Inf Serv 44:128Google Scholar
- Lumme J (1978) Phenology and photoperiodic diapause in northern populations of Drosophila. In: Dingle H (ed) Evolution of insects migration and diapause. Springer, Berlin, pp 45–169Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-111.Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2003) A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing (DSC 2003), ViennaGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
- R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
- Skaug H, Fournier D, Nielsen A, Magnusson A and Bolker B ($Date: 2013-07-16 13:52:38–0400 (Tue, 16 Jul 2013) $). _Generalized linear mixed models using AD Model Builder_. R package version 0.7.7Google Scholar
- Su Y-S, Yajima M (2014) R2jags: a package for running jags from R. R package version 0.03-12. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags
- Zuur AF, Hilbe JM, Ieno EN (2013) A beginner’s guide to GLM and GLMM with R. Highland Statistics Ltd., NewburghGoogle Scholar