Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 12, pp 1973–1983 | Cite as

Male chimpanzees compromise the foraging success of their mates in Kibale National Park, Uganda

  • Melissa Emery Thompson
  • Martin N. Muller
  • Richard W. Wrangham
Original Paper

Abstract

Sexual conflict develops when the optimal reproductive strategy for one sex inflicts fitness costs upon the other sex. Among species with intense within-group feeding competition and high costs of reproduction, females are expected to experience reduced foraging efficiency by associating with males, and this may compromise their reproductive ability. Here, we test this hypothesis in chimpanzees, a species with flexible grouping patterns in which female avoidance of large subgroups has been attributed to their relatively high costs of grouping. In an >11-year study of the Kanyawara community of East African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Kibale National Park, Uganda, the availability of sexually receptive females was a key determinant of the number of males in parties. In turn, females experienced significantly lower C-peptide of insulin levels, indicative of reduced energy balance, during periods when they associated with more males. Female associates did not produce the same negative effect. C-peptide levels positively and significantly predicted female ovarian steroid production, indicating that the costs of associating with males can lead to downstream reproductive costs. Therefore, we conclude that Kanyawara chimpanzees exhibit sexual conflict over subgroup formation, with the large groupings that allow males to compete for mating opportunities inflicting energetic and reproductive costs on females. Because association with males is central to female chimpanzees’ anti-infanticide strategy, and males may confer other benefits, we propose that reproductive success in female chimpanzees hinges on a delicate balance between the costs and benefits of associating with male conspecifics.

Keywords

Apes Sexual conflict Costs of grouping Energy balance Ovarian function C-peptide of insulin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant # 0849380, the Leakey Foundation, and the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Research permissions and institutional support were provided by the Uganda Wildlife Authority, Ugandan National Council for Science and Technology, the Makerere University Biological Field Station, and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Harvard University and the University of New Mexico. We thank Dr. Emily Otali and the field staff of the Kibale Chimpanzee Project for maintaining daily data collections, and Sarah Schmidt, Jayda Patterson, and Erin Fitzgerald for assistance in the laboratory. Thank you also to two anonymous reviewers and to Maria van Noordwijk for their helpful comments.

Ethical standards

Research was conducted with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Harvard University and the University of New Mexico and local permissions from the Uganda Wildlife Authority, Ugandan National Council for Science and Technology, and the Makerere University Biological Field Station.

References

  1. Alberts SC, Altmann J, Wilson ML (1996) Mate guarding constrains foraging activity of male baboons. Anim Behav 51:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DP, Nordheim EV, Boesch C (2006) Environmental factors influencing the seasonality of estrus in chimpanzees. Primates 47:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Basabose AK (2004) Fruit availability and chimpanzee party size at Kahuzi montane forest, Democratic Republic of Congo. Primates 45:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The Chimpanzees of the Taї forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (2000) Determinants of group size in social primates: the importance of travel costs. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 24–42Google Scholar
  7. Chapman CA, White FJ, Wrangham RW (1994) Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos: a reevaluation of theory based on two similarly forested sites. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 41–58Google Scholar
  8. Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Chapman LJ (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. In: McGrew WC, Marchant LF, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–57Google Scholar
  9. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Czekala NM, Gallusser S, Meier JE, Lasley BL (1986) The development and application of an enzyme immunoassay for urinary estrone conjugates. Zoo Biol 5:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deschner T, Boesch C (2007) Can the patterns of sexual swelling cycles in female Taї chimpanzees be explained by the cost-of-sexual-attraction hypothesis? Int J Primatol 28:389–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deschner T, Heistermann M, Hodges K, Boesch C (2003) Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. Anim Behav 66:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deschner T, Kratzsch J, Hohmann G (2008) Urinary C-peptide as a method for monitoring body mass changes in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Horm Behav 54:620–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doran DM (1997) Influence of seasonality on activity patterns, feeding behavior, ranging, and grouping patterns in Taï chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 18:183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dufour DL, Sauther ML (2002) Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. Am J Hum Biol 14:584–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellison PT, Valeggia CR (2003) C-peptide levels and the duration of lactational amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 80:1279–1280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emery Thompson M (2013) Reproductive ecology of wild female chimpanzees. Am J Primatol 75:222–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emery Thompson M (2005a) Endocrinology and ecology of wild female chimpanzee reproduction. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Emery Thompson M (2005b) Reproductive endocrinology of wild female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): methodological considerations and the role of hormones in sex and conception. Am J Primatol 67:137–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emery Thompson M, Knott CD (2008) Urinary C-peptide of insulin as a non-invasive marker of energy balance in wild orangutans. Horm Behav 53:526–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2006) Comparison of sex differences in gregariousness in fission-fusion species: reducing bias by standardizing for party size. In: Newton-Fisher NE, Notman H, Reynolds V, Paterson J (eds) Primates of Western Uganda, Developments in primatology: progress and prospects. Springer, New York, pp 209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2008a) Diet and reproductive function in wild female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am J Phys Anthropol 135:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2008b) Male mating interest varies with female fecundity in Pan troglodytes of Kanyawara, Kibale National Park. Int J Primatol 29:885–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Emery Thompson M, Jones JH, Pusey AE, Brewer-Marsden S, Goodall J, Marsden D, Matsuzawa T, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Wrangham RW (2007a) Aging and fertility patterns in wild chimpanzees provide insights into the evolution of menopause. Curr Biol 17:2150–2156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Emery Thompson M, Kahlenberg SM, Gilby IC, Wrangham RW (2007b) Core area quality is associated with variance in reproductive success among female chimpanzees at Kanyawara, Kibale National Park. Anim Behav 73:501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emery Thompson M, Muller MN, Wrangham RW, Lwanga JS, Potts KB (2009) Urinary C-peptide tracks seasonal and individual variation in energy balance in wild chimpanzees. Horm Behav 55:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emery Thompson M, Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW (2010) Dynamics of social and energetic stress in wild female chimpanzees. Horm Behav 58:440–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emery Thompson M, Muller MN, Wrangham RW (2012) The energetics of lactation and the return to fecundity in wild chimpanzees. Behav Ecol 23:1234–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Emery MA, Whitten PL (2003) Size of sexual swellings reflects ovarian function in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Georgiev AV (2012) energetic costs of reproductive effort in male chimpanzees. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Georgiev A, Emery Thompson M, Lokasola A, Wrangham RW (2011) Seed-predation by bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Kokolopori, Democratic Republic of Congo. Primates 52:309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilby IC, Pokempner A, Wrangham R (2010) A direct comparison of scan and focal sampling methods for measuring wild chimpanzee feeding behaviour. Folia Primatol 81:254–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Girard-Buttoz C, Higham JP, Heistermann M, Wedegartner S, Maestripieri D, Engelhardt A (2011) Urinary C-peptide measurement as a marker of nutritional status in macaques. PLoS One 6:e18042PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Girard-Buttoz C, Heistermann M, Rahmi E, Marzec A, Agil M, Fauzan PA, Engelhardt A (2014) Mate-guarding constrains foraging activity but not energetic status of wild male long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:583–595PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Belknap, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Grueter CC, Deschner T, Behringer V, Fawcett K, Robbins MM (2014) Socioecological correlates of energy balance using urinary C-peptide measurements in wild female mountain gorillas. Physiol Behav 127:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris TR, Chapman CA, Monfort SL (2010) Small folivorous primate groups exhibit behavioral and physiological effects of food scarcity. Behav Ecol 21:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hashimoto C, Furuichi T, Tashiro Y (2001) What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. Int J Primatol 22:947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hashimoto C, Suzuki S, Takenoshita Y, Yamagiwa J, Basabose AK, Furuichi T (2003) How fruit abundance affects the chimpanzee party size: a comparison between four study sites. Primates 44:77–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Higham JP, Heistermann M, Maestripieri D (2011) The energetics of male-male endurance rivalry in free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Behav 81:1001–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Howie PW, McNeilly AS (1982) Effect of breast-feeding patterns on human birth intervals. J Reprod Fertil 65:545–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hrdy SB (1979) Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethol Sociobiol 1:13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Itoh N, Nishida T (2007) Chimpanzee grouping patterns and food availability in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 48:87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janson CH, Goldsmith M (1995) Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behav Ecol 6:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnstone RA, Keller L (2000) How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the costs of mating. Am Nat 156:368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kahlenberg SM (2006) Female-female competition and male sexual coercion in Kanyawara chimpanzees. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahlenberg SM, Emery Thompson M, Muller MN (2008) Immigration costs for female chimpanzees and male protection as an immigrant counterstrategy to intrasexual aggression. Anim Behav 76:1497–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knott CD (1999) Reproductive, physiological and behavioral responses of orangutans in Borneo to fluctuations in food availability. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Knott CD (2005) Energetic responses to food availability in the great apes: implications for hominid evolution. In: Brockman DK, van Schaik CP (eds) Seasonality in primates: studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann J, Boesch C (2005) Bisexually bonded ranging in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lehmann J, Boesch C (2008) Sexual differences in chimpanzee sociality. Int J Primatol 29:65–81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lehmann J, Boesch C (2009) Sociality of the dispersing sex: the nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 77:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lehmann J, Korstjens AH, Dunbar RIM (2007) Fission-fusion social systems as a strategy for coping with ecological constraints: a primate case. Evol Ecol 21:613–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lipson SF, Ellison PT (1996) Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Hum Reprod 11:2090–2096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Machanda Z (2009) The ecology of male–female social relationships among East African chimpanzees. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  56. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1994) A cost of sexual harassment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matsubara M (2003) Costs of mate guarding and opportunistic mating among wild male Japanese macaques. Int J Primatol 24:1057–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Matsumoto-Oda A, Hosaka K, Huffman MA, Kawanaka K (1998) Factors affecting party size in chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. Int J Primatol 19:999–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitani JC, Gros-Louis J, Richard AF (1996) Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. Am Nat 147:966–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Muller MN (2002) Agonistic relations among Kanyawara chimpanzees. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Muller MN, Mitani JC (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Stud Behav 35:275–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) (2009) Sexual coercion in primates: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2007) Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW (2009) Male aggression against females and sexual coercion in chimpanzees. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 184–217Google Scholar
  65. Newton-Fisher NE, Reynolds V, Plumptre AJ (2000) Food supply and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) party size in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Int J Primatol 21:613–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Odendaal F, Turchin P, Stermitz F (1989) Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nyphalidae). Oecologia 78:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Otali E, Gilchrist JS (2005) Why chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) mothers are less gregarious than nonmothers and males: the infant safety hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pandolfi SS (2004) Ecological sex differences in Gombe chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). PhD Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  69. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition. Academic, New York, pp 123–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos T Roy Soc B 361:235–259Google Scholar
  71. Pepper JW, Mitani JC, Watts DP (1999) General gregariousness and specific social preferences among wild chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 20:613–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pilastro A, Benetton S, Bisazza A (2003) Female aggregation and male competition reduce costs of sexual harassment in the mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. Anim Behav 65:1161–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pontzer H, Wrangham RW (2006) Ontogeny of ranging in wild chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 27:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosetta L, Lee PC, Garcia C (2011) Energetics during reproduction: a doubly labeled water study of lactating bonobos. Am J Phys Anthropol 144:661–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rowe L (1992) Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duratino. Anim Behav 44:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schwartz M, Figlewicz D, Baskin D, Woods S, Porte DJ (1992) Insulin in the brain: a hormonal regulator of energy balance. Endocr Rev 13:387–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Sherry DS, Ellison PT (2007) Potential applications of urinary C-peptide of insulin for comparative energetics research. Am J Phys Anthropol 133:771–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shideler SE, Munro CJ, Tell L, Owitt G, Laughlin LS, Chatterton R Jr, Lasley BL (1990) The relationship of serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations to the enzyme immunoassay measurements of urinary estrone conjugates and immunoreactive pregnanediol-3-glucuronide in Macaca mulatta. Am J Primatol 22:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smuts BB, Smuts RW (1993) Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Stud Behav 22:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sterck EHM, Watts DP, van Schaik CP (1997) The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stone GN (1995) Female foraging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes. Anim Behav 50:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strack A, Sebastian R, Schwartz M, Dallman M (1995) Glucocorticoids and insulin: reciprocal signals for energy balance. Am J Physiol 268:R142–R149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Stumpf RM, Boesch C (2005) Does promiscuous mating preclude female choice? Female sexual strategies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taї National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Valeggia CR, Ellison PT (2004) Lactational amenorrhoea in well-nourished Toba women of Formosa, Argentina. J Biosocial Sci 36:573–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wallis J (1997) A survey of reproductive parameters in the free-ranging chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. J Reprod Fertil 109:297–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wasser SK (1996) Reproductive control in wild baboons measured by fecal steroids. Biol Reprod 55:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Watts DP (2007) Effects of male group size, parity, and cycle stage on female chimpanzee copulation rates at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates 48:222–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Watts DP, Mitani JC (2002) Hunting and meat sharing by chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 244–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Watts DP, Pusey AE (1993) Behavior of juvenile and adolescent great apes. In: Pereira ME, Fairbanks LA (eds) Juvenile primates: life history. Development and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 148–167Google Scholar
  90. Williams JM, Liu H-Y, Pusey AE (2002) Costs and benefits of grouping for female chimpanzees at Gombe. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams J, Oehlert GW, Carlis JV, Pusey AE (2004) Why do male chimpanzees defend a group range? Anim Behav 68:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson ML, Wrangham RW (2003) Intergroup relations in chimpanzees. Ann Rev Anthropol 32:363–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61:1203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2007) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk. Behaviour 144:1621–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson ML, Kahlenberg SM, Wells M, Wrangham RW (2012) Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees. Anim Behav 83:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood JW (1994) Dynamics of human reproduction: biology, biometry, demography. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Wrangham RW (1980) An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75:262–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wrangham RW (1986) Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzee. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution: birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 352–378Google Scholar
  99. Wrangham RW (1999) Evolution of coalitionary killing: the imbalance-of-power hypothesis. Yearb Phys Anthropol 42:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wrangham RW (2000) Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 248–258Google Scholar
  101. Wrangham RW (2002) The cost of sexual attraction: is there a trade-off in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion? In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wrangham RW, Smuts B (1980) Sex differences in the behavioral ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 28:13–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Wrangham RW, Chapman CA, Clark AP, Isabirye-Basuta G (1996) Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups. In: McGrew WC, Marchant LF, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Emery Thompson
    • 1
  • Martin N. Muller
    • 1
  • Richard W. Wrangham
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anthropology, MSC01-1040University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations