Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 11, pp 1871–1881 | Cite as

Elevation-related differences in novel environment exploration and social dominance in food-caching mountain chickadees

  • Dovid Kozlovsky
  • Carrie Branch
  • Cody A. Freas
  • Vladimir V. Pravosudov
Original Paper

Abstract

Harsh and unpredictable environments have been assumed to favor the evolution of better learning abilities in animals. At the same time, individual variation in learning abilities might be associated with variation in other correlated traits potentially forming a behavioral syndrome. We have previously reported significant elevation-related differences in spatial memory and the hippocampus in food-caching mountain chickadees. Here, we tested for elevation-related differences in novel environment exploration, neophobia, and social dominance—behavioral traits previously thought to correlate with individual variation in cognition, using different birds from the same elevations. Compared to low-elevation birds, high-elevation chickadees were slower at novel environment exploration, but there were no detectable differences in neophobia. High-elevation chickadees were also socially subordinate to low-elevation chickadees in pairwise interactions. Considering previously reported elevation-related differences in cognition and the brain, our results suggest, however indirectly, that elevation-related variation in spatial memory might be associated with differences in novel environment exploration and in ability to obtain a high social rank in winter social groups. Whether these behavioral traits represent a behavioral syndrome or whether climate might affect these traits independently, our results suggest that multiple differences between elevations might assist with elevation-related separation. High-elevation chickadees would likely experience higher mortality if they move to lower elevation due to their low social dominance status and low-elevation chickadees might experience higher mortality if they move to higher elevation due to reduced memory ability and lack of behavioral adaptations to colder climate.

Keywords

Cognition Chickadee Elevation-related differences Environment Social dominance Novel environment exploration Neophobia Food caching 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Kaileigh Bingham, Shelby Brown, Skylar Estes, Kallie Kappes, and Kristina Pomerleau for help with bird maintenance. Comments from two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. VVP was supported by NSF (IOS 1351295).

Ethical standards

All experiments reported here comply with the current laws of the United States of America. Chickadees were collected under Federal (MB022532) and California (5210) scientific collecting permits. All animal procedures were in accordance with the University of Nevada Reno Animal Care and Use Protocol (00576).

References

  1. Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Laland KN (2006) The relationship between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Anim Behav 72:1229–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chancellor LV, Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2011) The effect of environmental harshness on neurogenesis: a large scale comparison. Dev Neurobiol 71:246–252PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole EF, Quinn JL (2012) Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1168–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dingemanse NJ, de Goede P (2004) The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits. Behav Ecol 15:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behavior in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2003) Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekman J (1989) Ecology of non-breeding social systems of Parus. Wilson Bull 101:263–288Google Scholar
  8. Exnerova A, Svadova KH, Fucikova E, Drent P, Stys P (2010) Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naïve bird predators to aposematic prey. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:723–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox RA, LaDage LD, Roth TC II, Pravosudov VV (2009) Behavioral profile predicts dominance status in mountain chickadees. Anim Behav 77:1441–1448PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Freas CA, LaDage LD, Roth TC II, Pravosudov VV (2012) Elevation-related differences in memory and the hippocampus in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Anim Behav 84:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freas CA, Bingman K, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2013a) Untangling elevation-related differences in the hippocampus in food-caching mountain chickadees: the effect of a uniform captive environment. Brain Behav Evol 82:199–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freas CA, Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2013b) Hippocampal neuron soma size is associated with population differences in winter climate severity in food-caching chickadees. Funct Ecol 27:1341–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosling SD (2001) From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 127:45–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg R (1990) Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Anim Behav 39:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffin AS, Guez D, Lermite F, Patience M (2013) Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLoS One 8:e84907PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Guillette LM, Reddon AR, Hurd PL, Sturdy CB (2009) Exploration of novel space is associated with individual differences in learning speed in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Behav Process 82:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillette LM, Reddon AR, Hoeschele M, Sturdy CB (2010) Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogstad O (1989) Social organization and dominance behavior in some Parus species. Wilson Bull 101:254–262Google Scholar
  19. Koivula K, Lahti K, Orell M, Rytkönen S (1993) Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kotrschal A, Taborsky B (2010) Environmental change enhances cognitive abilities in fish. PLoS Biol 8:e1000351PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations, No. 2. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  22. Marchetti C, Drent PJ (2000) Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits. Anim Behav 60:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mettke-Hoffman C, Winkler H, Leisler B (2002) The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pravosudov VV, Clayton NS (2002) A test of the adaptive specialization hypothesis: population differences in caching, memory and the hippocampus in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla). Behav Neurosci 116:515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pravosudov VV, Grubb TC Jr (1999) Effects of dominance on vigilance in avian social groups. Auk 116:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pravosudov VV, Lucas JR (2000) The effect of social dominance on fattening and food caching behavior in Carolina chickadees. Anim Behav 60:483–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pravosudov VV, Roth TC II (2013) Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: the evolution of spatial memory and the hippocampus. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 44:173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pravosudov VV, Smulders TV (2010) Integrating ecology, psychology, and neurobiology within a food-hoarding paradigm. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pravosudov VV, Mendoza SP, Clayton NS (2003) The relationship between dominance, corticosterone, memory and food caching in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Horm Behav 44:93–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pravosudov VV, Kitaysky AS, Wingfield JC, Clayton NS (2004) No latitudinal differences in adrenocortical stress response in wintering black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla). Comp Biochem Physiol A 137:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratcliffe L, Mennill DJ, Schubert KA (2007) Social dominance and fitness in black-capped chickadees. In: Otter K (ed) Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament with ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:219–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roth TC II, Pravosudov VV (2009) Hippocampal volume and neuron numbers increase along a gradient of environmental harshness: a large-scale comparison. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2010) Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3187–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2011) Variation in hippocampal morphology along an environmental gradient: controlling for the effect of day length. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2662–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Freas CA, Pravosudov VV (2012) Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations with different climates: a common garden approach. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roth TC II, LaDage LD, Chavalier D, Pravosudov VV (2013) Variation in hippocampal glial cell numbers in food-caching birds from different climates. Dev Neurobiol 73:480–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schubert KA, Mennill DJ, Ramsay SM, Otter KA, Boag PT, Ratcliffe LM (2007) Variation in social rank acquisition influences lifetime reproductive success in black-capped chickadees. Biol J Linn Soc 90:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sih A, Giudice MD (2012) Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos T Roy Soc B 367:2762–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC (2004a) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004b) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephens DW (1991) Change, regularity and value in the evolution of animal learning. Behav Ecol 2:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  45. Verbeek MEM, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR (1994) Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behavior of male great tits. Anim Behav 48:1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verbeek MEM, Boon A, Drent PJ (1996) Exploration, aggressive behavior, and dominance in pair-wise confrontations of juvenile male great tits. Behaviour 133:945–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verbeek MEM, de Goede P, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR (1999) Individual behavioral characteristics and dominance in aviary groups of great tits. Behaviour 136:23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. von Merten S, Siemers BM (2012) Exploratory behavior in shrews: fast-lived Sorex versus slow-lived Crocidura. Anim Behav 84:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dovid Kozlovsky
    • 1
  • Carrie Branch
    • 1
  • Cody A. Freas
    • 1
  • Vladimir V. Pravosudov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation BiologyUniversity of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations