Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 10, pp 1603–1609 | Cite as

Interactive effects of male and female age on extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous seabird

  • Alejandra G. Ramos
  • Schyler O. Nunziata
  • Stacey L. Lance
  • Cristina Rodríguez
  • Brant C. Faircloth
  • Patricia Adair Gowaty
  • Hugh Drummond
Original Paper

Abstract

Females sometimes obtain older sires for their offspring through extra-pair interactions, but how female age influences paternity is largely unexplored and interactive effects across the age span of both sexes have not been analyzed. To test whether female choice of sire age varies with female age in the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), we examined associations between ages of both partners and the probability of extra-pair paternity (EPP) in 350 broods of parents up to 22 years old in a single breeding season. Extra-pair paternity enables a female to select an alternative sire for her offspring and could function to avoid or achieve particular combinations of parental ages. A male age × female age interaction revealed that in young females (≤4 years), EPP decreased with increasing age of the social partner, whereas in old females (≥8 years), it increased. Moreover, sires of extra-pair (EP) chicks of young females paired to young males were on average 6.33 years older than the females’ social partners. Since female boobies control copulatory access, this pattern could imply that young females choose old sires for their proven genetic quality and that old females avoid very old males because matings with them may risk infertility or genetic defects in offspring. Taking female age into account and observing across the whole age span may be necessary for understanding female age-based mate choice.

Keywords

Age Female choice Extra-pair paternity Extra-pair sire Infertility Good genes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Simon C. Griffith, Lynna M. Kiere, Marcela Osorio-Beristain, Diana Pérez-Staples, Oscar Sánchez-Macouzet, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank numerous volunteers and colleagues who helped in the field and lab, especially Santiago Bautista-López, Jonathan P. Drury, Gabriela López-Carapia, and Janeth Rosas-Morales. The Armada de México, local fishermen, and staff of the Parque Nacional Isla Isabel supplied vital and much appreciated logistical support. This study was financed by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (PAPIIT, IN206610) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (104313). This manuscript constitutes a partial fulfillment of the Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. AGR wishes to acknowledge the scholarship and financial support provided by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. This research was partially supported by US Department of Energy under award number DE­FC09­07SR22506 to the University of Georgia Research Foundation.

Ethical standards

We declare that the present study complies with the current laws and ethical standards of animal research in Mexico. The Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) provided the permit (SGPA/DGVS/08333/10) to collect blood samples.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

265_2014_1769_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 33 kb)

References

  1. Akçay E, Roughgarden J (2007) Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol Ecol Res 9:855Google Scholar
  2. Beamonte-Barrientos R, Velando A, Drummond H, Torres R (2010) Senescence of maternal effects: aging influences egg quality and rearing capacities of a long-lived bird. Am Nat 175:469–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck CW, Promislow DE (2007) Evolution of female preference for younger males. PLoS One 2:e939PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonadonna F, Nevitt GA (2004) Partner-specific odor recognition in an Antarctic seabird. Science 306:835–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouwman KM, Komdeur J (2005) Old female reed buntings (Emberiza schoeniclus) increase extra-pair paternity in their broods when mated to young males. Behaviour 142:11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16:308–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Budden AE, Dickinson JL (2009) Signals of quality and age: the information content of multiple plumage ornaments in male western bluebirds Sialia mexicana. J Avian Evol 40:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo A, Chavez-Peón C (1983) Ecología reproductiva e influencia del comportamiento en el control del número de crias en el bobo de patas azules Sula nebouxii en la Isla Isabel, Nayarit. Undergraduate thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAMGoogle Scholar
  9. Catry P, Phillips RA, Forcada J, Croxall JP (2006) Factors affecting the solution of a parental dilemma in albatrosses: at what age should chicks be left unattended? Anim Behav 72:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S (2012) The influence of male age on within-pair and extra-pair paternity in passerines. Ibis 154:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Descamps S, Boutin S, Berteaux D, Gaillard JM (2008) Age-specific variation in survival, reproductive success and offspring quality in red squirrels: evidence of senescence. Oikos 117:1406–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dietrich V, Schmoll T, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (2004) Pair identity—an important factor concerning variation in extra-pair paternity in the coal tit (Parus ater). Behaviour 141:817–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond H, González E, Osorno JL (1986) Parent-offspring cooperation in the blue-footed boody (Sula nebouxii): social roles in infanticial brood reduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drummond H, Torres R, Krishnan VV (2003) Buffered development: resilience after aggressive subordination in infancy. Am Nat 161:794–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faircloth BC, Ramos A, Drummond H, Gowaty PA (2009) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from blue-footed boobies (Sula nebouxii). Conserv Genet Resour 1:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisch H, Hyun G, Golden R, Hensle TW, Olsson CA, Liberson GL (2003) The influence of paternal age on Down syndrome. J Urology 169:2275–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gowaty PA, Bridges WC (1991) Nestbox availability affects extra-pair fertilizations and conspecific nest parasitism in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Anim Behav 41:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen T, Price D (1995) Good genes and old age: do old mates provide superior genes? J Evol Biol 8:759–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasson O, Stone L (2011) Why do females have so few extra-pair offspring? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson SL, Gemmell NJ (2012) Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference? Do hidden advantages of mating with old males off-set costs related to fertility, or are we missing something else? Bioessays 34:609–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones T, Balmford A, Quinnell R (2000) Adaptive female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:681–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kempenaers B, Dhondt AA (1993) Why do females engage in extra-pair copulations? A review of hypotheses and their predictions. Belg J Zool 123:93–103Google Scholar
  24. Kim S-Y, Velando A, Torres R, Drummond H (2011) Effects of recruiting age on senescence, lifespan and lifetime reproductive success in a long-lived seabird. Oecologia 166:615–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kipper S, Kiefer S (2010) Age-related changes in birds’ singing styles: on fresh tunes and fading voices? Adv Stud Behav 41:77–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kleven O, Marthinsen G, Lifjeld JT (2006) Male extraterritorial forays, age and paternity in the socially monogamous reed bunting (Emberiza schoeniclus). J Ornithol 147:468–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kokko H (1998) Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evol Ecol 12:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kühnert B, Nieschlag E (2004) Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update 10:327–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu XP, Xu J, He HM, Kuang XJ, Xue FS (2011) Male age affects female mate preference and reproductive performance in the cabbage beetle, Colaphellus bowringi. J Insect Behav 24:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubjuhn T, Gerken T, Brün J, Schmoll T (2007) Yearling male great tits, Parus major, suffer more strongly from cuckoldry than older males. Zoology 110:387–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manning J (1985) Choosy females and correlates of male age. J Theor Biol 116:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitro S, Gordon AR, Olsson MJ, Lundström JN (2012) The smell of age: perception and discrimination of body odors of different ages. PLoS One 7:e38110PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Møller A, Mousseau T, Rudolfsen G, Balbontin J, Marzal A, Hermosell I, De Lope F (2009) Senescent sperm performance in old male birds. J Evol Biol 22:334–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson JB (1978) The Sulidae: gannets and boobies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Oro D, Torres R, Rodríguez C, Drummond H (2010) Climatic influence on demographic parameters of a tropical seabird varies with age and sex. Ecology 91:1205–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osorio-Beristain M, Drummond H (1998) Non-aggressive mate guarding by the blue-footed booby: a balance of female and male control. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pérez-Staples D, Drummond H (2005) Tactics, effectiveness and avoidance of mate guarding in the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Priest NK, Mackowiak B, Promislow DE (2002) The role of parental age effects on the evolution of aging. Evolution 56:927–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Radwan J (2003) Male age, germline mutations and the benefits of polyandry. Ecol Lett 6:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramos AG, Nunziata SO, Lance SL, Rodríguez C, Faircloth BC, Gowaty PA, Drummond H (2014) Habitat structure and colony structure constrain extra-pair paternity in a colonial bird. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Rätti O, Lundberg A, Tegelström H, Alatalo RV (2001) No evidence for effects of breeding density and male removal on extrapair paternity in the pied flycatcher. Auk 118:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  45. Richard M, Lecomte J, de Fraipont M, Clobert J (2005) Age-specific mating strategies and reproductive senescence. Mol Ecol 14:3147–3155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saino N, Ambrosini R, Martinelli R, Møller AP (2002) Mate fidelity, senescence in breeding performance and reproductive trade-offs in the barn swallow. J Anim Ecol 71:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Meth Ecol Evol 1:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59:1819–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strandh M, Westerdahl H, Pontarp M, Canbäck B, Dubois MP, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bonadonna F (2012) Major histocompatibility complex class II compatibility, but not class I, predicts mate choice in a bird with highly developed olfaction. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4457–4463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stutchbury BJM, Piper WH, Neudorf DL, Tarof SA, Rhymer JM, Fuller G, Fleischer RC (1997) Correlates of extra-pair fertilization success in hooded warblers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torres R, Velando A (2003) A dynamic trait affects continuous pair assessment in the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Torres R, Velando A (2005) Male preference for female foot colour in the socially monogamous blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Anim Behav 69:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Torres R, Velando A (2010) Color in a long-lived tropical seabird: sexual selection in a life-history context. Adv Stud Behav 42:155–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torres R, Drummond H, Velando A (2011) Parental age and lifespan influence offspring recruitment: a long-term study in a seabird. PLoS One 6:e27245PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Velando A, Noguera JC, Drummond H, Torres R (2011) Senescent males carry premutagenic lesions in sperm. J Evol Biol 24:693–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandra G. Ramos
    • 1
  • Schyler O. Nunziata
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stacey L. Lance
    • 2
  • Cristina Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Brant C. Faircloth
    • 4
  • Patricia Adair Gowaty
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Hugh Drummond
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Savannah River Ecology LaboratoryUniversity of GeorgiaAikenUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Institute of the Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations