Density dependence and habitat quality modulate the intensity of display territory defence in an exploded lekking species
- 337 Downloads
We evaluated the effect of conspecific abundance and habitat quality of leks on the territorial behaviour of males in an exploded lekking species, the Little Bustard (Tetrax tetrax). The hypothesis that males more intensely defend territories with higher conspecific abundance and better habitat quality was evaluated experimentally analysing the agonistic response of experimental males to male decoys placed on their displaying areas. Decoy experiments showed that the intensity of display territory defence by little bustard males is density dependent. The time experimental males took to return to their display sites after decoy placement decreased with abundance of both males and females. The strength of their final response was positively associated to local male and female abundance in the vicinity of their display sites. Habitat quality also influenced males’ display territory defence since the intensity of male response increased with the degree of natural vegetation cover. Habitat quality was particularly relevant in explaining variation of experimental males’ snort call rate, which decreased with the degree in plough cover and increased with the number of fields in the lekking area. Snort call rate decreased with the level of male aggregation and was lowest in males exhibiting the strongest aggressive response to decoys. These results add new evidence for the density dependence of species’ breeding territorial behaviour, supporting density-dependent models of lek formation and reinforcing the role of resources defence in exploded lek mating systems.
KeywordsAggressive behaviour Decoy experiments Fallows Resource defence Spain
Particular thanks are due to Vincent Bretagnolle and Frédéric Jiguet for lending their little bustard decoys for experiments. We thank all farmers, hunting managers and gamekeepers of our study areas for allowing us to work on their properties. Salvador Luna, Laura Iglesias, Juan Bécares, Núria Pocino, Sergi Ricart, Pau Ferrer and María Castañeda collaborated during some stages of the work. FC and JM-P were supported by a JAE-Doc contract funded by Spanish Research Council and the European Social Fund (ESF), and ELG was funded by a FPU grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education. The comments of two anonymous reviewers sensibly improved the first version of the manuscript. This paper contributes to projects CGL2004-06147-C02-01, CGL2004-06147-C02-02 and CGL2009-13029/BOS of the Spanish Ministry of Science, as well as to the REMEDINAL2 network of the Community of Madrid (S-2009/AMB/1783). MBM, FC and GB contributed equally to the final outcome of the present study.
The experiments here described complied with the laws of Spain and the regions (Catalonia, Castilla-La Mancha and Madrid) where they were performed.
- Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Arroyo B, Bretagnolle V (1999) Field identification of individual Little bustard Tetrax tetrax males using plumage patterns. Ardeola 46:53–60Google Scholar
- Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practice information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: the behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol II. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (1996) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol III. Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- García de la Morena EL, Bota G, Ponjoan A, Morales MB (2006) El sisón común en España. I Censo Nacional (2005). SEO⁄BirdLife, MadridGoogle Scholar
- Gilliard ET (1969) Birds of paradise and bowerbirds. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Grant JA (1997) Territoriality. In: Godin JGJ (ed) Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Oxford, pp 81–103Google Scholar
- Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jiguet F, Ollivier D (2002) Male phenotypic repeatability in the threatened Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax: a tool to estimate turnover and dispersal. Ardea 90:43–50Google Scholar
- Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Morales MB, Jiguet F, Arroyo B (2001) Exploded leks: what bustards can teach us. Ardeola 48:85–98Google Scholar
- Silva JP (2010) Factors affecting the abundance of the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax: implications for conservation. PhD Thesis, University of Lisbon, LisbonGoogle Scholar
- StatSoft Inc (2005) STATISTICA 7.1. www.statsoft.com
- Sutherland WJ (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Villers A (2010) Écologie spatiale, processus comportementaux et dynamiques des populations d'une espèce menacée, l'outarde canepetière. PhD Thesis, Université de Paris VI, ParisGoogle Scholar