Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 6, pp 947–955 | Cite as

Short independent lives and selection for maximal sperm survival make investment in immune defences unprofitable for leaf-cutting ant males

Original Paper

Abstract

The short-lived males of ants and other highly eusocial Hymenoptera are essentially ejaculates with compound eyes, brains and wings to vector sperm to its destination. Males compete for lifetime ejaculate storage by females to produce the equivalent of somatic cells (sterile workers) and new seed-propagules (gynes; males are haploid and have no father) after the colony has become sexually mature. Hymenopteran queens never re-mate later in life, which makes partner commitment between queen and male-ejaculate analogous to a sperm and egg committing when forming a zygote that subsequently sequesters a germ line and produces somatic tissues. This semelparous commitment remains unchanged when queens store ejaculates from multiple males, and colonies become chimeras of patrilines. The soma of eusocial hymenopteran males may thus not be under selection for more than minimal independent life, but eusocial male ejaculates are unusually long-lived, and sperm cells may not be used until years after storage. Somatic repair and immune defence in males should thus be minimal, particularly in response to challenges late in adult life. We tested this idea using males of Atta and Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants and show that lethal infections with the fungal pathogen Metarhizium brunneum affect male sperm quality, but fail to induce an encapsulation immune response. This result is consistent with expectation because fungal infections are highly unlikely to ever reach immature ant males while they are nursed by their sister workers and because males will die natural deaths after leaving their colonies to mate before new infections can kill them.

Keywords

Metarhizium brunneum Immunity Encapsulation response Atta colombica Acromyrmex echinatior 

References

  1. Alcock J, Barrows EM, Gordh G, Hubbard LJ, Kirkendall L, Pyle DW, Ponder TL, Zalom FG (1978) The ecology and evolution of male reproductive behaviour in the bees and wasps. Zool J Linnean Soc 64:293–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardia DR, Gantz JE, Schneider BC, Strebel S (2012) Costs of immunity in insects: an induced immune response increases metabolic rate and decreases antimicrobial activity. Funct Ecol 26:732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2004) Male reproductive investment and queen mating-frequency in fungus-growing ants. Behav Ecol 15:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2006) Mating biology of the leaf-cutting ants Atta colombica and A. cephalotes. J Morphol 267:1165–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) The artificial insemination of bumblebee queens. Insect Soc 47:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2006) Phenotypic variation in male and worker encapsulation response in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Ecol Entomol 31:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer B, Krug A, Boomsma JJ, Hughes WOH (2005) Examination of the immune responses of males and workers of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior and the effect of infection. Insect Soc 52:298–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baer B, Armitage SAO, Boomsma JJ (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 441:872–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischoff JF, Rehner SA, Humber RA (2009) A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycologia 101:512–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boomsma JJ (2013) Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philos Trans R Soc B 368:20120050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J (2005a) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:395–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boomsma JJ, Schmid-Hempel P, Hughes WOH (2005b) Life histories and parasite pressure across the major groups of social insects. In: Fellowes MDE, Holloway GJ, Rolff J (eds) Insect evolutionary ecology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 139–175Google Scholar
  13. Boucias DG, Pendland JC (1998) Principles of insect pathology. Kluwer, NorwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calleri DV, Rosengaus RB, Traniello JFA (2007) Immunity and reproduction during colony foundation in the dampwood termite, Zootermopsis angusticollis. Physiol Entomol 32:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cremer S, Sixt M (2009) Analogies in the evolution of individual and social immunity. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cremer S, Armitage SAO, Schmid-Hempel P (2007) Social immunity. Curr Biol 17:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Den Boer SPA, Boomsma JJ, Baer B (2008) Seminal fluid enhances sperm viability in the leafcutter ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1843–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Den Boer SPA, Baer B, Dreier S, Aron S, Nash DR, Boomsma JJ (2009) Prudent sperm use by leaf-cutter ant queens. Proc R Soc B 276:3945–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327:1506–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dijkstra MB, Nash DR, Boomsma JJ (2005) Self-restraint and sterility in workers of Acromyrmex and Atta leafcutter ants. Insect Soc 52:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eslin P, Prevost G (2000) Racing against host’s immunity defenses: a likely strategy for passive evasion of encapsulation in Asobara tabida parasitoids. J Insect Physiol 46:1161–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox CW, Dublin L, Pollitt SJ (2003) Gender differences in lifespan and mortality rates in two seed beetle species. Funct Ecol 17:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerloff CU, Ottmer BK, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Effects of inbreeding on immune response and body size in a social insect, Bombus terrestris. Funct Ecol 17:582–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinze J, Hölldobler B (1993) Fighting for a harem of queens—physiology of reproduction in Cardiocondyla male ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:8412–8414PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hölldobler B, Bartz SH (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. Progr Zool 31:237–257Google Scholar
  26. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Cambridge, BelknapCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2008) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Holman L (2009) Sperm viability staining in ecology and evolution: potential pitfalls. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1679–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holman L, Stürup M, Trontti K, Boomsma JJ (2011) Random sperm use and genetic effects on worker caste fate in Atta colombica leaf-cutting ants. Mol Ecol 20:5092–5102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes WOH, Eilenberg J, Boomsma JJ (2002) Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants. Proc R Soc B 269:1811–1819PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughes WOH, Thomsen L, Eilenberg J, Boomsma JJ (2004) Diversity of entomopathogenic fungi near leaf-cutting ant nests in a neotropical forest, with particular reference to Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. J Invertebr Pathol 85:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller L, Genoud M (1997) Extraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of ageing. Nature 389:958–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Konrad M, Vyleta ML, Theis FJ, Stock M, Tragust S, Klatt M, Drescher V, Marr C, Ugelvig LV, Cremer S (2012) Social transfer of pathogenic fungus promotes active immunisation in ant colonies. PLoS Biol 10:e1001300PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. McNamara KB, Wedell N, Simmons LW (2013) Experimental evolution reveals trade-offs between mating and immunity. Biol Lett 9:20130262PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290:1166–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) Entomology—immune defence in bumble-bee offspring. Nature 414:506–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Donnell S, Beshers SN (2004) The role of male disease susceptibility in the evolution of haplodiploid insect societies. Proc R Soc B 271:979–983PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Poulsen M, Bot AN, Nielsen MG, Boomsma JJ (2002) Experimental evidence for the costs and hygienic significance of the antibiotic metapleural gland secretion in leaf-cutting ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2009) Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:3143–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Radhakrishnan P, Fedorka KM (2012) Immune activation decreases sperm viability in both sexes and influences female sperm storage. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:3577–3583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rantala MJ, Roff DA (2007) Inbreeding and extreme outbreeding cause sex differences in immune defence and life history traits in Epirrita autumnata. Heredity 98:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT (2002) Copulation corrupts immunity: a mechanism for a cost of mating in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9916–9918PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosengaus R, Traniello JA, Bulmer M (2011) Ecology, behavior and evolution of disease resistance in termites. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, Netherlands, pp 165–191Google Scholar
  44. Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Brown MJF (2006) Males vs workers: testing the assumptions of the haploid susceptibility hypothesis in bumblebees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmid-Hempel P (2005) Evolutionary ecology of insect immune defenses. Annu Rev Entomol 50:529–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seeley TD (2010) Honeybee democracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  48. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (1996) Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:317–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simmons LW (2012) Resource allocation trade-off between sperm quality and immunity in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav Ecol 23:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siva-Jothy MT, Thompson JJW (2002) Short-term nutrient deprivation affects immune function. Physiol Entomol 27:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stürup M, Den Boer SPA, Nash D, Boomsma JJ, Baer B (2011) Variation in male body size and reproductive allocation in the leafcutter ant Atta colombica; estimating variance components and possible trade-offs. Insect Soc 58:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stürup M, Baer-Imhoof B, Nash DR, Boomsma JJ, Baer B (2013) When every sperm counts: factors affecting male fertility in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol 24:1192–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suefuji M, Cremer S, Oettler J, Heinze J (2008) Queen number influences the timing of the sexual production in colonies of Cardiocondyla ants. Biol Lett 4:670–673PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Sumner S, Hughes WOH, Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ (2004) Ant parasite queens revert to mating singly. Nature 428:35–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ugelvig LV, Kronauer DJC, Schrempf A, Heinze J, Cremer S (2010) Rapid anti-pathogen response in ant societies relies on high genetic diversity. Proc R Soc B 277:2821–2828PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Vainio L, Hakkarainen H, Rantala MJ, Sorvari J (2004) Individual variation in immune function in the ant Formica exsecta; effects of the nest, body size and sex. Evol Ecol 18:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van der Most PJ, de Jong B, Parmentier HK, Verhulst S (2011) Trade-off between growth and immune function: a meta-analysis of selection experiments. Funct Ecol 25:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Villesen P, Murakami T, Schultz TR, Boomsma JJ (2002) Identifying the transition between single and multiple mating of queens in fungus-growing ants. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:1541–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker TN, Hughes WOH (2009) Adaptive social immunity in leaf-cutting ants. Biol Lett 5:446–448PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Weber NA (1972) Gardening ants: the attines. The American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson EO, Fagen RM (1974) On the estimation of total behavioral repertoires in ants. J NY Entomol Soc 82:106–112Google Scholar
  65. Yamauchi K, Ishida Y, Hashim R, Heinze J (2006) Queen-queen competition by precocious male production in multiqueen ant colonies. Curr Biol 16:2424–2427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yek SH, Mueller UG (2011) The metapleural gland of ants. Biol Rev 86:774–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yek SH, Boomsma JJ, Schiøtt M (2013) Differential gene expression in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants after challenges with two fungal pathogens. Mol Ecol 22:2173–2187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Evolution, Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Centre for Integrative Bee Research (CIBER) ARC CoE in Plant Energy BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092)The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations