Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 163–171 | Cite as

Transitioning from unstable to stable colony growth in the desert leafcutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor

  • Rebecca M. Clark
  • Jennifer H. Fewell
Original Paper

Abstract

Like organisms, cohesive social groups such as insect colonies grow from a few individuals to large and complex integrated systems. Growth is driven by the interplay between intrinsic growth rates and environmental factors, particularly nutritional input. Ecologically inspired population growth models assume that this relationship remains constant until maturity, but more recent models suggest that it should be less stable at small colony sizes. To test this empirically, we monitored worker population growth and fungal development in the desert leafcutter ant, Acromyrmex versicolor, over the first 6 months of colony development. As a multitrophic, symbiotic system, leafcutter colonies must balance efforts to manage both fungus production and the growth of the ants consuming it. Both ants and fungus populations grew exponentially, but the shape of this relationship transitioned at a size threshold of 89 ± 9 workers. Above this size, colony mortality plummeted and colonies shifted from hypometric to hypermetric growth, with a distinct stabilization of the relationship between the worker population and fungus. Our findings suggest that developing colonies undergo key changes in organizational structure and stability as they grow, with a resulting positive transition in efficiency and robustness.

Keywords

Development Acromyrmex Division of labor Colony growth Leafcutter ant Social allometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to John Weser, Bob Johnson, and Diana Wheeler for the help with queen collections, to Kimberly Shaffer for the help with colony care, to Tate Holbrook and Leah Drake for the idea development, and to Jon Harrison, Ulrich Mueller, and two anonymous reviewers for the feedback on the manuscript. Funding for this project came from National Science Foundation DDIG grant 1011171 awarded to RMC and JHF.

Supplementary material

265_2013_1632_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (607 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 606 kb)
265_2013_1632_MOESM2_ESM.r (8 kb)
ESM 2 (R 8.13 kb)
265_2013_1632_MOESM3_ESM.csv (4 kb)
ESM 3 (CSV 4.03 kb)

References

  1. Adams RMM, Mueller UG, Holloway AK, Green AM, Narozniak J (2000) Garden sharing and garden stealing in fungus-growing ants. Naturwissenschaften 87:491–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RMM, Shah K, Antonov LD, Mueller UG (2012) Fitness consequences of nest infiltration by the mutualist-exploiter Megalomyrmex adamsae. Ecol Entomol 37:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson C, McShea DW (2001) Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol Rev 76:211–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustin J, Santos J (2008) Behavior of early generations of Atta sexdens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) workers during preparation of leaf substrate for symbiont fungus gardens. Sociobiol 51(1):265–281Google Scholar
  5. Autuori M (1950) Contribuição para o conhecimento da saúva (Atta spp.–Hymenoptera–Formicidae) V—Número de formas aladas e redução dos sauveiros iniciais. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 19:325–331Google Scholar
  6. Bass M, Cherrett JM (1994) The role of leaf-cutting ant workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fungus garden maintenance. Ecol Entomol 19:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass M, Cherrett J (1996) Fungus garden structure in the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens (Formicidae, Attini). Symbiosis 21(1):9–24Google Scholar
  8. Brown JJ, Traniello JFA (1998) Regulation of brood-care behavior in the dimorphic castes of the ant Pheidole morrisi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): effects of caste ratio, colony size, and colony needs. J Insect Behav 11(2):209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burd M, Howard J (2005) Central-place foraging continues beyond the nest entrance: the underground performance of leaf-cutting ants. Anim Behav 70:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahan S, Julian G (1999) Fitness consequences of cooperative colony founding in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Behav Ecol 10(5):585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camargo R, Forti L, Lopes J, Andrade A, Ottati A (2007) Age polyethism in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus Forel, 1911 (Hym., Formicidae). J Appl Entomol 131(2):139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camargo R, Forti L, Lopes J, de Matos C (2008) Growth of populations and the fungus garden of Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) response to foraged substrates. Sociobiol 52(3):633–643Google Scholar
  13. Cole B (2009) The ecological setting of social evolution: the demography of ant populations. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–104Google Scholar
  14. Doi H, Cherif M, Iwabuchi T, Katano I, Stegen J, Striebel M (2010) Integrating elements and energy through the metabolic dependencies of gross growth efficiency and the threshold elemental ratio. OIKOS 119(5):752–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dornhaus A, Powell S, Bengston S (2012) Group size and its effects on collective organization. Annu Rev Entomol 57:123–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández-Marín H, Zimmerman J, Wcislo W (2004) Ecological traits and evolutionary sequence of nest establishment in fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini). Biol J Linn Soc 81(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fewell JH, Bertram SM (1999) Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fewell JH, Schmidt SK, Taylor T (2009) Division of labor in the context of complexity. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 483–502Google Scholar
  19. Fowler HG (1992) Patterns of colonization and incipient nest survival in Acromyrmex niger and Acromyrmex balzani (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 39:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamboa GJ (1975) Foraging and leaf-cutting of the desert gardening ant Acromyrmex versicolor versicolor (Pergande) (Hymenoptera: Formcidae). Oecologia 20:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gautrais J, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L, Anderson C (2002) Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. J Theor Biol 215:363–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glazier D (2005) Beyond the “3/4-power law”: variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol Rev 80(4):611–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon D (1989) Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Anim Behav 38:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green AM, Mueller UG, Adams RMM (2002) Extensive exchange of fungal cultivars between sympatric species of fungus-growing ants. Molec Ecol 11:191–195Google Scholar
  25. Holbrook CT, Barden PM, Fewell JH (2011) Division of labor increases with colony size in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav Ecol 22(5):960–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2010) A consumer–resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecol 91:1286–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hou C, Kaspari M, Vander Zanden HB, Gillooly JF (2010) Energetic basis of colonial living in social insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(8):3634–3638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Z, Robinson G (1996) Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39(3):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeanne RL (1999) Group size, productivity, and information flow in social wasps. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels J (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jeanne R, Nordheim E (1996) Productivity in a social wasp: per capita output increases with swarm size. Behav Ecol 7(1):43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeanson R, Fewell J, Gorelick R, Bertram S (2007) Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(2):289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson RA, Rissing SW (1993) Breeding biology of the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor (Pergande) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 66:127–128Google Scholar
  34. Johnson RA, Ward PS (2002) Biogeography and endemism of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Baja California, Mexico: a first overview. J Biogeogr 29:1009–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Julian G, Cahan S (1999) Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim Behav 58:437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kang Y, Clark R, Makiyama M, Fewell J (2011) Mathematical modeling on obligate mutualism: Interactions between leaf-cutter ants and their fungus garden. J Theor Biol 289:116–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karsai I, Wenzel J (1998) Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(15):8665–8669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kay A (2004) The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behav Ecol 15(1):63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kay AD, Rostampour S, Sterner R (2006) Ant stoichiometry: elemental homeostasis in stage-structured colonies. Funct Ecol 20(6):1037–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kitano H (2004) Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet 5(11):826–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehdiabadi NJ, Schultz TR (2010) Natural history and phylogeny of the fungus-farming ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini). Myrmecol News 13:37–55Google Scholar
  42. Michener C (1964) Reproductive efficiency in relation to colony size in hymenopterous societies. Insect Soc 11:317–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muggeo VMR (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22:3055–3071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muggeo VMR (2009) segmented: segmented relationships in regression models with breakpoints/changepoints estimation. R package. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=segmented
  45. Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer–resource dynamics: research monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. Naug D, Gadagkar R (1998) Division of labor among a cohort of young individuals in a primitively eusocial wasp. Insect Soc 45(3):247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nonacs P (1991) Less growth with more food: how insect–prey availability changes colony demographics in the ant, Camponotus floridanus. J Insect Physiol 37(12):891–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oster G, Wilson E (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1985) Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1986) Adaptive value of nanitic workers in newly founded red imported fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:723–726Google Scholar
  51. Pratt S, Mallon E, Sumpter D, Franks N (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at http://www.R-project.org
  53. Reichardt AK, Wheeler DE (1996) Multiple mating in the ant Acromyrmex versicolor: a case of female control. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 38:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rissing SW, Johnson RA, Pollock GB (1986) Natal nest distribution and pleometrosis in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor (Pergande) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 93:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rissing S, Pollock G, Higgins M, Hagen R, Smith D (1989) Foraging specialization without relatedness or dominance among co-founding ant queens. Nat 338(6214):420–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rissing S, Johnson R, Martin J (2000) Colony founding behavior of some desert ants: geographic variation in metrosis. Psyche 103:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G (1986) Akaike information criterion statistics. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  58. Salazar-Ciudad I (2010) Morphological evolution and embryonic developmental diversity in metazoa. Dev 137(4):531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J (2004) How different types of pattern formation mechanisms affect the evolution of form and development. Evol Dev 6(1):6–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seal JN, Tschinkel WR (2007) Energetics of newly-mated queens and colony founding in the fungus-gardening ants Cyphomyrmex rimosus and Trachymyrmex septentrionalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Physiol Entomol 32:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seal JN, Tschinkel WR (2008) Food limitation in the fungus-gardening ant Trachymyrmex septentrionalis. Ecol Entomol 33:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2004) Quorum sensing during nest-site selection by honeybee swarms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56(6):594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seid MA, Traniello JFA (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentate (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:631–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules. Harvard Business Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Tenhumberg B, Tyre AJ, Rebarber R (2009) Model complexity affects transient population dynamics following a dispersal event: a case study with pea aphids. Ecology 90:1878–1890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas M, Elgar M (2003) Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica. Naturwissenschaften 90:88–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Tschinkel WR (1988) Colony growth and the ontogeny of worker polymorphism in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tschinkel W (1991) Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insect Soc 38:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tschinkel WR (2011) Back to basics: sociometry and sociogenesis of ant societies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 14:49–54Google Scholar
  71. Ward PS (2005) A synoptic review of the ants of California (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 936:1–68Google Scholar
  72. Waters JS, Holbrook CT, Fewell JH, Harrison JF (2010) Allometric scaling of metabolism, growth, and activity in whole colonies of the seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Am Nat 176:501–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber NA (1972) Gardening ants, the attines. American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  74. Wetterer JK (1994) Ontogenic changes in forager polymorphism and foraging ecology in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Oecologia 98:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wetterer JK, Himler AG, Yospin MM (2001) Foraging ecology of the desert leaf-cutting ant, Acromyrmex versicolor, in Arizona (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 37:633–649Google Scholar
  76. Wilson E (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Atta). 1. The overall pattern in Atta sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson E (1983) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Atta). 4. Colony ontogeny of Atta cephalotes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14(1):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wirth R, Hubert H, Ryel RJ, Beyschlag W, Holldobler B (2003) Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants: a case study on Atta colombica in the tropical rainforest of Panama. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yang A (2007) Thinking outside the embryo: the superorganism as a model for EvoDevo studies. Biol Theor 2(4):398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations