Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 12, pp 2011–2027 | Cite as

Demography, demand, death, and the seasonal allocation of labor in the Florida harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex badius)

Original Paper

Abstract

As a self-organizing entity, an ant colony must divide a limited number of workers among numerous competing functions. Adaptive patterns of labor allocation should vary with colony need across each annual cycle, but remain almost entirely undescribed in ants. Allocation to foraging in 55 field colonies of the Florida harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex badius) followed a consistent annual pattern over 4 years. Foragers preceded larvae in spring and peaked during maximal larval production in summer (0.37). In spring, proportion foraging increased due to an increase in forager number and reduction in colony size, and in late summer, it decreased as colony size increased through new worker birth and a loss of ∼3 % of foragers per day. The removal of 50 % of the forager population revealed that, at the expense of larval survival, colonies did not draw workers from other castes to fill labor gaps. To determine if labor allocation was age specific, whole colonies were marked with cuticle color-specific wire belts and released, and each cohort's time to first foraging was noted. Workers that eclosed in summer alongside sexual alates darkened quickly and became foragers at ∼43 days of age, whereas autumn-born workers required 200 or more days to do so. Following colony reproduction, these long-lived individuals foraged alongside short-lived, summer-born sisters during the next calendar year. Therefore, the large-scale, predictable patterns of labor allocation in P. badius appear to be driven by bimodal worker development rate and age structure, rather than worker responsiveness to changes in colony demand.

Keywords

Adaptive demography Caste ratios Foraging Formicidae Labor allocation Pogonomyrmex badius Programmed death 

References

  1. Bailey NTJ (1952) Improvements in the interpretation of recapture data. J Anim Ecol 21:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beers WCMv, Kleijnen JPC (2004) Kriging interpolation in simulation: a survey. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. pp. 41–48Google Scholar
  3. Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.413 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beshers SN, Traniello JFA (1994) The adaptiveness of worker demography in the attine ant Trachymyrmex septentrionalis. Ecology 75:763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubour JL (1998) Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Bull Math Biol 60(4):753–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Calabi P, Porter SD (1989) Worker longevity in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: ergonomic considerations of correlations between temperature, size and metabolic rates. J Insect Physiol 35:643–649. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(89)90127-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calabi P, Traniello JFA (1989) Social organization in the ant Pheidole dentata: physical and temporal caste ratios lack ecological correlates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calderone NW (1995) Temporal division of labor in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: a developmental process or the result of environmental influences? Can J Zool 73:1410–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole BJ, Wiernasz DC (2000) Size and reproduction in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Insectes Sociaux 47:249–255Google Scholar
  11. Erickson JM (1972) Mark-recapture techniques for population estimates of Pogonomyrmex ant colonies: an evaluation of the 32P technique. Ann Entomol Soc Am 65:57–61Google Scholar
  12. Farris SM, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE (2001) Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. J Neurosci 55:1328–1338Google Scholar
  13. Franks NR, Tofts C (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48:470–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuda H (1983) The relationship between work efficiency and population size in a honeybee colony. Popul Ecol 25:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gentry JB (1974) Response to predation by colonies of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 55:1328–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Golley FB, Gentry JB (1964) Bioenergetics of the southern harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 45:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon DM (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. Am Nat 138:379–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon DM, Chu J, Lillie A, Tissot M, Pinter N (2005) Variation in the transition from inside to outside work in the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Insect Soc 52:212–217. doi:10.1007/s00040-004-0796-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2007) Interaction rate informs harvester ant task decisions. Behav Ecol 18:451–455. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herbers JM, Adamowicz SC, Helms SD (1985) Seasonal changes in social organization of Aphaenogaster rudis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiol 10:1–15Google Scholar
  22. Holbrook C, Barden P, Fewell J (2011) Division of labor increases with colony size in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav Ecol 22:960–966. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89(24):11726–11172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang Z, Robinson GE (1996) Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson BR (2008) Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeler KH (1982) Preliminary report of colony survivorship in the western harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) in Western Nebraska. Southwest Nat 27:245–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kipyatkov VE, Lopatina EB (2003) Temperature and photoperiodic control of seasonal life cycles in ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomol Obozr 82:801–819Google Scholar
  28. Kipyatkov VE, Lopatina EB (2009) Temperature and photoperiodic control of diapause induction in the ant Lepisiota semenovi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Turkmenistan. J Evol Biochem Physiol 45:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lachaud JP, Fresneau D (1987) Social regulation in Ponerine ants. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects: les Treilles Workshop, vol 54, Experientia Supplementum (Behavior of Social Insects). Birkhauser, Basel, pp 197–217Google Scholar
  30. Lincoln FC (1930) Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns. US Department of Agriculture Circular 118:1–4Google Scholar
  31. Lindauer M (1953) Division of labour in the honeybee colony. Bee World 34:63–90Google Scholar
  32. MacKay WP (1981) A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. Psyche 88:25–74Google Scholar
  33. McDonald P, Topoff H (1985) Social regulation of behavioral development in the ant, Novomessor albisetosus (Mayr). J Comp Psychol 99:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meudec M, Lenoir A (1982) Social responses to variation in food supply and nest suitability in ants (Tapinoma erraticum). Anim Behav 30:284–292. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80265-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer ST, Leal IR, Wirth R (2009) Persisting hyper-abundance of leaf-cutting ants (Atta spp.) at the edge of an old Atlantic forest fragment. Biotrop 41:711–716. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00531.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mirenda JT, Vinson SB (1979) A marking technique for adults of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol 62:279–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mirenda JT, Vinson SB (1981) Division of labor and specification of castes in the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. Anim Behav 29:410–420. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80100-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakata K (1996) Does behavioral flexibility compensate or constrain colony productivity? Relationship among age structure, labor allocation, and production of workers in ant colonies. J Insect Behav 9:557–569. doi:10.1007/BF02213880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naug D, Camazine S (2002) The role of colony organization on pathogen transmission in social insects. J Theor Biol 215:427–439. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2524 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nobua-Behrmann BE, Casenave JL, Milesi FA, Pavan B (2013) Forager abundance and its relationship with colony activity level in three species of South American Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. Insect Soc 60:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oettler J, Johnson RA (2009) The old ladies of the seed harvester ant Pogonomyrmex rugosus: foraging performed by two groups of workers. J Insect Behav 22:217–226. doi:10.1007/s10905-008-9167-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Page RE, Mitchell SD (1998) Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor. Apidologie 29(1–2):171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pinter-Wollman N, Wollman R, Guetz A, Holmes S, Gordon DM (2011) The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants. J R Soc Interface 8:1562–1573. doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1980) Recapture studies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei Cole, using a fluorescent marking technique. Ecol Entomol 5:263–269. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980.tb01149.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1988) Longevity of harvester ant colonies in southern Idaho. J Range Manage 41:104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1985) Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:323–336. doi:10.1007/BF00295545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pratt SC (1994) Ecology and behavior of Gnamptogenys horni (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Insect Soc 41:255–262. doi:10.1007/BF01242296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Châline N, Jaisson P (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol 17:1308–1312. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.047 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi C, Strambi A (1992) Colony integration in honey bees: mechanisms of behavioral reversion. Ethol 90(4):336–348. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson EJH, Feinerman O, Franks NR (2009) Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 276:4373–4380. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rueppell O, Bachelier C, Fondrk MK, Page RE Jr (2007) Regulation of life history determines lifespan of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Exp Gerontol 42(10):1020–1032. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2007.06.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanders NJ, Gordon DM (2002) Resources and the flexible allocation of work in the desert ant, Aphaenogaster cockerelli. Insect Soc 49:371–379. doi:10.1007/PL00012661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Santos JC, Yamamoto M, Oliveira FR, DelClaro K (2005) Behavioral repertory of the weaver ant Camponotus (Myrmobrachys) senex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiol 46:27–37, www.csuchico.edu/biol/Sociobiology/sociobiologyindex.html Google Scholar
  56. Schafer RJ, Holmes S, Gordon DM (2006) Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants. Anim Behav 71:815–822. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmid-Hempel P (1992) Worker castes and adaptative demography. J Evol Biol 5:1–12. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5010001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seeley TD (1989) The honey bee colony as a superorganism. Am Nat 150:522–541Google Scholar
  59. Seid MA, Traniello JFA (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:631–644. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0207-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seid MA, Harris KM, Traniello JFA (2005) Age-related changes in the number and structure of synapses in the lip region of the mushroom bodies in the ant Pheidole dentata. J Comp Neurol 488:269–277. doi:10.1002/cne.20545 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sendova-Franks A, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (A study of temporal polyethism, experimental). Bull Math Biol 55:75–96. doi:10.1007/BF02460295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith CR (2007) Energy use and allocation in the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: are stored seeds a buffer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1479–1487. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0380-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith CR, Suarez AV (2010) The trophic ecology of castes in harvester ant colonies. Funct Ecol 24:122–130. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01604.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith CR, Tschinkel WR (2006) The sociometry and sociogenesis of reproduction in the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. J Insect Sci 6:1–11. doi:10.1673/2006_06_32.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55:891–918. doi:10.1007/BF02460691 Google Scholar
  66. Toth AL, Robinson GE (2003) Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees. Anim Behav 69:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tripet F, Nonacs P (2004) Foraging for work and age-based polyethism: the roles of age and previous experience on task choice in ants. Ethol 110:863–877. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01023.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tschinkel WR (1987) Fire ant queen longevity and age: estimation by sperm depletion. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:263–266Google Scholar
  69. Tschinkel WR (1988) Social control of egg-laying rate in queens of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Physiol Entomol 13:327–350. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1988.tb00484.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tschinkel WR (1991) Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insect Soc 38:77–82. doi:10.1007/BF01242715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tschinkel WR (1993) Sociometry and sociogenesis in colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol Monogr 63:425–457Google Scholar
  72. Tschinkel WR (1998) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season. Insect Soc 45:385–410. doi:10.1007/s000400050097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tschinkel WR (1999) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: distribution of workers, brood and seeds within the nest in relation to colony size and season. Ecol Entomol 24:222–237. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00184.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tschinkel WR (2004) The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. J Insect Sci 4:21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tschinkel WR (2011a) Back to basics: sociometry and sociogenesis of ant societies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 14:49–54Google Scholar
  76. Tschinkel WR (2011b) The organization of foraging in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. J Insect Sci 11:26. doi:10.1673/031.011.0126 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tschinkel WR (2013) A method for using ice to construct subterranean ant nests (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and other soil cavities. Myrmecol News 18:99–102Google Scholar
  78. Wiernasz DC, Cole BJ (1995) Spatial distribution of Pogonomyrmex occidentalis: recruitment, mortality and overdispersion. J Anim Ecol 64:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson EO (1953) The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants. Q Rev Biol 28:136–156. doi:10.1086/399512 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilson EO (1968) The ergonomics of caste in the social insects. Am Nat 102:41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilson EO (1976a) Behavioral discretization and number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:141–154. doi:10.1007/BF00299195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson EO (1976b) A social ethogram of the Neotropical arboreal ant Zacryptocerus varians (Fr. Smith). Anim Behav 24:354–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in Atta sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:143–156. doi:10.1007/BF00299520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations