Site fidelity of male Galápagos sea lions: a lifetime perspective
- 382 Downloads
Knowledge about the distribution of resources can lead to the development of spatial preferences and long-term site fidelity. Individuals are expected to choose sites that best suit their needs. However, dominant individuals restrict movements of less competitive ones. Accordingly, one may expect spatial preferences to differ with regard to individual characteristics and to change over time. We investigated lifetime changes of site fidelity patterns with regard to reproductive success in male Galápagos sea lions (Zalophus wollebaeki). Showing a high degree of natal philopatry in the first 2 years of life, non-territorial males pass through a stage of fidelity to their natal colony where they develop preferences for areas outside prime breeding areas. Variation in the degree of spatial preferences was not associated with age or size, characteristics linked to an individual’s dominance status. For non-territorial males, roaming proved to be an adequate strategy to gain reproductive success. Only the most competitive males established territories in areas preferentially visited by females. They had a high probability to return to breeding areas where they successfully reproduced in previous seasons. Overall, the results reveal lifetime changes in site fidelity with regard to male status. The degree of site fidelity observed within the colony suggests familiarity and thus a high degree of tolerance among individuals using the same areas. This seems to facilitate attendance in the colony and thus the possibility to prospect for oestrus females.
KeywordsPhilopatry Life history Intra-sexual competition Reproductive strategy Age-related dominance
This study was funded by the VW-Stiftung, Friends of the Galapagos Switzerland, German Research Foundation (TR 105/18, TR 105/18-2), German Academic Exchange Service and the Ethological Society. We are grateful for the permission and close collaboration of the Galápagos National Park Service as well as the logistical support of the Charles Darwin Research Station. We thank J.B.W. Wolf, B. Müller, and U. Pörschmann who ran the project in previous years. E. Hippauf and P. Viehoever helped with DNA analysis. This study could not have been done without the enduring field assistance of many helpers.
The study presented here complies with the laws of Ecuador and was licensed by the Galápagos National Park Service.
- Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Bollinger EK, Gavin TA (1989) The effects of site quality on breeding-site fidelity in bobolinks. Auk 106:584–594Google Scholar
- Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: the behavior and ecology of two sexes. University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Fisher JB (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 71–83Google Scholar
- Getty T (1987) Dear enemies and the prisoner’s dilemma: why should territorial neighbours form defensive coalitions? Am Zool 27:327–336Google Scholar
- Heath CB (1989) The behavioral ecology of the California sea lion, Zalophus californinaus. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
- Kraus C, Mueller B, Meise K, Piedrahita P, Pörschmann U, Trillmich F (2012) Mama’s boy: sex differences in juvenile survival in a highly dimorphic large mammal, the Galapagos sea lion. Oecologia (published online, doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2469-7)
- LeBeouf BJ (1974) Male–male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am Zool 14:163–176Google Scholar
- Pyle P, Sydeman WJ, Hester M (2001) Effects of age, breeding experience, mate fidelity and site fidelity on breeding performance in a declining population of Cassin’s auklets. J Anim Ecol 70:1088–1097Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Shields WM, Crook JR, Hebblethwaite ML, Wiles-Ehmann SS (1988) Ideal free coloniality in the swallows. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior. Academic, San Diego, pp 189–228Google Scholar
- Stirling I (1975) Factors affecting the evolution of social behavior in the Pinnipedia. Rapport P-v Reunion Conseil International Exploration de la Mer 169:205–212Google Scholar
- Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
- Waser PM, Wiley RH (1980) Mechanisms and evolution of spacing in animals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh JG (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Plenum, New York, pp 159–222Google Scholar