Denning behaviour of the European badger (Meles meles) correlates with bovine tuberculosis infection status
Heterogeneities in behaviours of individuals may underpin important processes in evolutionary biology and ecology, including the spread of disease. Modelling approaches can sometimes fail to predict disease spread, which may partly be due to the number of unknown sources of variation in host behaviour. The European badger is a wildlife reservoir for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in Britain and Ireland, and individual behaviour has been demonstrated to be an important factor in the spread of bTB among badgers and to cattle. Radio-telemetry devices were deployed on 40 badgers from eight groups to investigate patterns of den (sett) use in a high-density population, where each group had one or two main and three to eight outlier setts in their territory. Badgers were located at their setts for 28 days per season for 1 year to investigate how patterns differed between individuals. Denning behaviour may have a strong influence on contact patterns and the transmission of disease. We found significant heterogeneity, influenced by season, sex and age. Also, when controlling for these, bTB infection status interacting with season was highly correlated with sett use. Test-positive badgers spent more time away from their main sett than those that tested negative. We speculate that wider-ranging behaviour of test-positive animals may result in them contacting sources of infection more frequently and/or that their behaviour may be influenced by their disease status. Measures to control infectious diseases might be improved by targeting functional groups, specific areas or times of year that may contribute disproportionately to disease spread.
KeywordsDisease transmission Movement patterns Denning behaviour Space use Wildlife disease management
We would like to thank the Woodchester Park field team for trapping and sampling badgers, in particular P. Spyvee for additional instruction on collar fitting. We are grateful to A. Tomlinson, K. Palphramand and S. Weber for discussion, data and comments. In addition, comments from two anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor greatly improved earlier drafts of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Project SE3032.
The experiments in this manuscript comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. Trapping and anaesthesia of badgers were carried out under licence from the UK Home Office (PPL60/3609) according to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Procedures were approved by the Food and Environment Research Agency Ethical Review Panel.
- Bourne FJ (2007) Bovine TB: the scientific evidence. Final report of the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Carter SP, Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Macdonald DW, Riordan P, Etherington TR, Pimley ER, Walker NJ, Cheeseman CL (2007) Culling-induced social perturbation in Eurasian badgers Meles meles and the management of TB in cattle: an analysis of a critical problem in applied ecology. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2769–2777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chambers MA, Crawshaw T, Waterhouse S, Delahay R, Hewinson RG, Lyashchenko KP (2008) Validation of the BrockTB Stat-Pak assay for detection of tuberculosis in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) and influence of disease severity on diagnostic accuracy. J Clin Microbiol 46:1498–1500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Donnelly CA, Woodroffe R, Cox DR, Bourne J, Cheeseman CL, Clifton-Hadley RS, Wei G, Gettinby G, Gilks P, Jenkins H, Johnston WT, Le Fevre AM, McInerney JP, Morrison WI (2005) Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle. Nature 439:843–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gascoyne SC, Laurenson MK, Lelo S, Bomer M (1993) Rabies in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in the Serengeti region, Tanzania. J Wildlife Dis 29:396–402Google Scholar
- Harris S, Cresswell P, Jefferies D (1989) Surveying badgers. The Mammal Society, publication no. 9. Mammal Society, BristolGoogle Scholar
- Johnson AM, Wadsworth J, Wellings K, Field J (1994) Sexual attitudes and lifestyles. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko Y, Newman C, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW (2010) Variations in badger (Meles meles) sett microclimate: differential cub survival between main and subsidiary setts, with implications for artificial sett construction. Int J Ecol 859586:10Google Scholar
- Neal E, Cheeseman C (1996) Badgers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Neal E, Roper TJ (1991) The environmental impact of badgers (Meles meles) and their setts. Sym Zool S 63:89–106Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Roper TJ (2010) Badger. HarperCollins, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Smith GC, Richards MS, Clifton-Hadley RS, Cheeseman CL (1995) Modelling bovine tuberculosis in badgers in England: preliminary results. Mammalia 59:639–50Google Scholar
- Soper GA (1939) The curious career of typhoid Mary. B New York Acad Med 15:698–712Google Scholar
- Woelfing B, Traulsen A, Milinski M, Boehm T (2009) Does intra-individual major histocompatibility complex diversity keep a golden mean? Proc Roy Soc Lond B 364:117–128Google Scholar
- Woodroffe R, Bourne FJ, Cheeseman CI, Cox DR, Donnelly CA, Gettinby G, McInerney JP, Morrison WI (2005b) Welfare of badgers (Meles meles) subjected to culling: development and evaluation of a closed season. Anim Welfare 14:19–25Google Scholar